• MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    There are no details here, but I’m going to bet the guy probably had a medical issue which killed him and caused him to crash. That seems more likely than the alternatives given what is and isn’t in the article.

    Edit: no one has any information. You want to talk about it, that’s my two cents. You want to wait on accurate information, this shouldn’t even be posted, because it just fuels low information speculation like this.

    • DxK@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      “There’s no information yet so I’m going to make up an explanation which is the most likely scenario given that there’s no information yet.”

      Brilliant.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m going to bet the guy manifested a car with his mental powers in an already-crashed state and then mind-wiped the guards and any witnesses into believing they saw it crash after altering the CCTV footage with his will.

        • DxK@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Lol yep. It cracks me up when people think just because they aren’t going to one extreme or the other with their speculation that they aren’t still engaging in wild speculation. That’s not how it works.

          • catloaf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            6 months ago

            They specifically said they were speculating.

              • catloaf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                6 months ago

                This is an Internet comments section. If you’re expecting everything to be 100% productive discussion, you’re going to have a bad time.

            • DxK@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              They actually didn’t “specifically” say that. At all. Until editing their comment an hour after being called out.

              • catloaf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                6 months ago

                They said “I’m going to bet”. That’s literal speculation.

                • DxK@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Okay so you clearly do not know what the words specific and literal mean. Got it.

                  • catloaf
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Apparently not, please enlighten me. I am eager to hear your definitions.

    • deaf_fish
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wonder what the odds are? I think would be interesting given all the stochastic terrorism that’s been bandied about.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, I wouldn’t bet the farm or anything. I had to dig up details elsewhere. I read that it was at a high rate of speed and at 10:30 PM. The traffic in DC during the day (what I was picturing) makes lethal speeds unlikely, but at that time on a weekend maybe it’s just drunk or otherwise reckless driving.

        At any rate, no use jumping to stochastic terrorism without any details to support that. Still might be but I feel like we’d have heard something by now. I really hate the 24 hour news cycle that encourages this kind of zero information story just in case details come out later and this traffic incident somehow becomes important.

    • ApostleO@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      I, for one, thought this was a reasonable take.

      What else do people expect you to comment? Like…

      Neat.

      Or…

      Thoughts and prayers for the driver and his family.

      ?

      What discussion can a post like this garner except speculation? And to preface your speculation with an acknowledgement that the story has no real details… seems fair to me.

      • catloaf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, and it doesn’t help when the OP is using their own secret rulebook for everything, I guess. I’m not sure what the point of having a discussion section is for if they don’t like people discussing a post.