• jimbolauski
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So far you have failed to provide a satisfactory reason for comparing a group of hateful racists (of which all of them are) to a religion (of which some of them believe justifies violence).

    I have, both rarely have violent incidences and are not a threat to society.

    Now it’s your turn to answer a question.

    How do nonviolent Muslims make the violent ones less of a threat to society?

    This goes way beyond basic prevalence. You just don’t seem to understand that.

    How does this go way beyond basic prevalence?

      • jimbolauski
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You still don’t get your comparison doesn’t work because you can’t claim one isn’t a threat when one is literally baked into society and one is a religion which only some members interpret the teachings of with the justification of violence.

        This is where you provide evidence

        In other words, you can’t stop focusing on prevalence of violent attacks between the two organized groups because in your mind, that’s all there is.

        Both threats are overblown and used as propaganda, that’s the common link.

        You claim there are good white supremacists.

        Back to this lie, I never claimed that there was a good white supremists. You have yet to provide where I made this claim.

        The other has become more than just a single group or organization, and is now baked into our way of life.

        Still waiting for evidence that white supremacy is now baked into out way of life.

              • jimbolauski
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                You’re not, your playing this little game because you know you can’t defend your position.

                  • jimbolauski
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’ll distill your circular logic. Hopefully it’s simple enough for you to grasp.

                    You have to provide A (good white supremists) because of B (comparison between white supremists violence and Muslim violence is invalid) but I won’t provide evidence of B until you provide A.

                    This is the game your playing because you don’t have evidence of B.