The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
The only exception is if Joe is implicated. But you haven’t shown any concrete evidence that this is the case.
You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.
Therefore it just seems like you just want to hate this guy, implying you’re the one who cares. Prove me wrong.
I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.
it just showed how little you understood my argument.
Your argument is that I’m obsessed with getting Joe based on a comment where I aknowledged there is no evidence of Joe’s involvement, and that is the only way I mentioned Joe.
Please show me the comment where I am out to get Joe.
deleted by creator
You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.
I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.
deleted by creator
Your proof that I hate the guy is ina comment where I said he wasn’t involved? I know logic is difficult for you but you can do better.
deleted by creator
The question mark at the end of a sentence is an indication that a question was asked. Was that too difficult of a question for you to answer?
deleted by creator
Then you would have answered it.
Your argument is that I’m obsessed with getting Joe based on a comment where I aknowledged there is no evidence of Joe’s involvement, and that is the only way I mentioned Joe.
Please show me the comment where I am out to get Joe.
deleted by creator