• jimbolauski
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      1st you asked for sources supporting my original reply. I provided the article which had the emails from Hunters laptop.

      Then you claimed the emails were not real, I provided the transcript of Hunter stating they were real.

      Then you claimed I was impuning Joe. I provided my original comment which showed I was not.

      Now you’re claiming the emails are not important to you but you keep replying.

      Where are you going to slither to next?

            • jimbolauski
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I didn’t say you were making up anything

              Literally your last response.

              Gaslight <- You are Here

              Do know what gaslight means?

              why Hunter Biden is even relevant here.

              I did not post this article, I merely corrected someone who claimed Hunter’s laptop only contained dick and drug picks. Apparently that was relevant enough for you to get worked up and ask for sources. Then after they were given dispute the authenticity of the sources.

                • jimbolauski
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I didn’t accuse you of posting the article, you didn’t have to tell me that, Lemmy says who the poster is lol.

                  Then why are you asking me why Hunter Biden is relevant?

                  The bigger question is why are you so invested in this discussion about Hunter if he’s not relevant.