The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
  • jimbolauski
    11·
    5 months ago

    I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.

    You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.

    More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care, I’ll answer yours. I dont have some nonsense gotcha that I’m clutching to.

    Replace care with relevant.

    Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.

    Better?

    Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.

    So why do you care enough to comment here at all?

    As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.

    When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.

    • You claimed I stated there were good white supremists. Below is your lie.

    You claim there are good white supremacists.

    • You’ve claimed I was gaslightning you and then in your very next reply claimed you never stated I was making things up. One of those is a lie.

    Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant

    I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.

    If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.

      • jimbolauski
        11·
        5 months ago

        I don’t give a single fuck what Hunter Biden does or doesn’t do, because he is not relevant in society.

        Then why ask for sources showing his wrong doing and dispute those sources?

          • jimbolauski
            11·
            5 months ago

            I haven’t once dismissed away anything you’ve provided evidence for

            Also you

            Hahahaha that article doesn’t have proof of shit.

            There’s no reason to lie about things.

            I’m simply asking you why you give enough of a shit to follow Hunter at all and discuss him on a Political community

            There was an impeachment inquiry into Joe based in part by the content of Hunter’s laptop. Instead of choosing to be ignorant on the matter I followed the proceedings. I responded because I knew my 100% factual statement correcting the liberal narrative would rile up you and your comrades.

              • jimbolauski
                11·
                5 months ago

                I didn’t dismiss your article, I said it had no proof of anything, which it didn’t. You needed to supplement that article with additional evidence to confirm it was accurate, then I stopped mentioning it, didn’t I?

                It did, they had emails from Hunters laptop. You weren’t one of those idiots that believed it was a Russian hoax were you? It has been know for quite some time that the emails were authentic.

                I know our threads can be hard to follow sometimes but that’s because you keep deflecting and forgetting the topic.

                It’s more you bounce to new things after you’re proved wrong.

                Yes, because the House can do that. 7 months into this inquiry and nothing has happened because there’s no evidence of wrongdoing.

                *No evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

                Further don’t speak on this event like you’re an expert you were totally unaware of the details.

                So you’re aware proceedings are still going on because they haven’t been able to find any wrongdoing, yeah?

                Rember my 1st post when I said Joe hasn’t been implicated… That hasn’t changed with the fact you just learned.

                Who’s riled? I’m simply asking for evidence that neither you nor the house have been able to find for 7 months now. I think you’re the riled one, posturing about it like it matters in the face of 7 months of dead ends.

                It looks like you forgot or are lieing again (my money is on the latter), I never claimed there was evidence of wrong doing by Joe.

                Honestly I’m not even mad. It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry. Otherwise you already would’ve. You’re just deep into the sunk cost fallacy rn and flailing.

                Please show me where I said there’s evidence of wrong doing by Joe? I guess this is what you’re weasling to now, it’s kind of pathetic that you have to make things up.

                  • jimbolauski
                    11·
                    5 months ago

                    You don’t even have to go as far as calling it a Russian hoax. In April of this year, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee investigating Hunter’s laptop found no wrongdoing. Do you believe the Republican House Committee specially tasked with finding in timing evidence in his emails are also part of the hoax?

                    No, the Russian hoax was a false claim that the laptop and the emails were fake. No evidence of wrong doing by Joe does not change the authenticity of the laptop.

                    Would you rather I double-down on the wrong thing? No wait that’s what Republicans do.

                    You just keep changing the reason you objected to my reply, first it was asking for a source, then the source “didn’t prove shit”, then Hunter confirming emails shut you up about that, then you bounced to its not relivent, now you seem to be arguing that there is no evidence of wrong doing by Joe, which is strange as I’ve been saying that through this thread.

                    You’re making up an accusation I made about you.

                    Also you

                    It’s fucking HILARIOUS watching you try to build a case against him because there is none. But you’re incapable of admitting it, just like the Republicans leading the impeachment inquiry.

                    There’s no reason to lie.

                    I’m simply looking for you to directly address that this is not related to Joe and that Hunter is irrelevant. Why won’t you just state it?

                    Emails showing Hunter and his buddies trying to set up corrupt deals with Joe isn’t relivent? That’s certainly worth looking into.

                    In other words, would it be more/less/same relevance for me to post an article about some shit one of TFG’s kids may or may not have done?

                    Who is TFG? If TFG is an elected official and there is evidence of TFGs kids scheming to involve TFG then yes.