• Coelacanth@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Harris has a lot of pressure on her. People are basically expecting a total domination from her, so anything less than that could derail her momentum very fast. And Trump might be terrible at classic debating, but he is actually very adept at bulldozing others by ignoring speaking in turns, deploying a fire hose of lies and misinformation and loudly talking over others.

    Let’s hope for good moderation.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 months ago

      Remember that Harris is an experienced prosecutor. Her literal job has been dealing with liars, cheats, and various scummy and desperate lawyers for years. If anyone can shut down the Trump oral vomit, it’s going to be her.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        She is, but Trump is special. I don’t know that any previous experience will necessarily apply. In the courtroom she would have always been empowered by speaking from a position of authority - Trump will show her no such decorum.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s on the moderation, and I can’t say I’ve seen good moderation for the big debates in a long time. They should bring in a grade school teacher who does regular debate classes and let them do what they know how to do.

          • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I guess I left that part unsaid, but yes. With good moderation Trump wouldn’t be able to run his schtick - but here we are. We have to play the hand we’re dealt.

          • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s what I’m saying, I think she needs to be authoritative and push back against him. None of the kids gloves wait-for-the-moderators-to-intervene bullshit. Put your foot down, put him in his place. Stare him down.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’d like to hear an “anyway” when he’s done and she gets back to her point. Like completely ignore his existence for a moment.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        She isn’t allowed to get frustrated because she’s a black woman. That’s the sad reality.

        Not only that but she can’t come across as condescending either because she’s a black woman.

        At the end of the day she must cater to low-info battleground state swing-voters. That is her target audience because she can do no right in the eyes of maga and she doesn’t really have to worry about Democrats.

        So what will someone like my uncle who fits that description respond positively to in such a debate?

        Probably not a pissing contest, but constantly pivoting directly to saying, “look I hear you. I understand many of you are feeling the pressure in the economy. You’ve been told it’s getting better but many of you aren’t feeling it. I understand. But we have a plan to relieve some of that pressure. And while we aren’t where we want to be, our country has recovered following the pandemic better than any country in the world. Slow and steady wins the race, and electing someone as volatile as Donald Trump who only helps his rich friends will not help the markets.”

      • Tom_Hanx_the_Actor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes. I would love to hear her say, literally, “I heard everything you said but I didn’t hear anything worth listening too. Anyway back on topic.”

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t know, that seems like something the Dems of old would do. “They go low, we go high” kind of thing. And also would let Trump completely control the flow, which is what he wants. I suspect the only way to beat him is to match him in loudness and push back with authority.

        I don’t think you can beat him by being “fair”, you have to beat him at his own game.

        • aStonedSanta
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          What’s interesting is Pete didn’t come off as rude, to me, even though he completely steamrolled them lol

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe say something like “well that was weird” and then, like you say, just go back to her point.