Children will be taught how to spot extremist content and misinformation online under planned changes to the school curriculum, the education secretary said.

Bridget Phillipson said she was launching a review of the curriculum in primary and secondary schools to embed critical thinking across multiple subjects and arm children against “putrid conspiracy theories”.

One example may include pupils analysing newspaper articles in English lessons in a way that would help differentiate fabricated stories from true reporting.

In computer lessons, they could be taught how to spot fake news websites by their design, and maths lessons may include analysing statistics in context.

  • Konis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Extremist content” == “not wanting Palestinians to be dehumanized, dispossessed and murdered by Israel”

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hopefully it tries to be as neutral as possible, and just gives kids the general tools to spot when something’s fake/exaggerated.

        Introducing this sort of thing without trying to be strictly impartial sounds like a slippery slope.

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Obviously. But I’m referring to why this was planned, ie. some events led to this being deemed necessary. I’m guessing it’s alt-right radicalisation and post-truth politics, and not the recent Israeli Invasion of Gaza.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hopefully it tries to be as neutral as possible

          No. Forcing a neutral perspective between absurdity and objectively true claims is how we got here.

          When one party says that scientific evidence is real and the other says it’s a Marxist conspiracy, forced neutralized lends undue credence to the latter.

          Similarly, forcibly neutral newsrooms and the neoliberal Starmer government consider it extremist to acknowledge that the fascist apartheid regime of Israel is committing genocide and to call for your country to not supply them with arms, funds, and political cover.

          It should try to be as FACTUAL and OBJECTIVE as possible, not chase neutrality when neutrality flies in the face of evidence and the most basic accountability and human rights.

          Introducing this sort of thing without trying to be strictly impartial sounds like a slippery slope.

          Yeah, they’re GOING to consider extremism as anything too far from the interests of the neoliberal and capitalist elite in either direction rather than pursue an evidence-based curriculum of critical thinking like they’re pretending.

          • catloaf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            A malicious teacher would probably already be doing that.

            • cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              sure, but now they have a reason to talk about this. If a teacher randomly talks about media bias kids are gonna think its weird as fuck and maybe tell parents, but now in this class