• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s the neat part, you’re not supposed to smoke at all.
    They can’t ban cigarettes outright, yet. But they can make sure it isn’t publicly visible, cool, or easy to do anymore.
    Smokers are supposed to be forced into enclosed, limited rooms just for smoking, separating it from all other activities.
    The goal is to break the cycle that gets young people to start smoking.

        • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Show me the statistics of how many people got cancer from second hand smoke in outdoor areas. I’ll wait. Just make cigarettes fucking expensive, like in Australia. Make smokers pay more for health insurance. There’s so many good ways of handling the problem. Banning people from smoking outside is just fuel for all the fucking Nazis that would love to get rid of the EU. And it won’t change a fucking Thing. As if people would suddenly stop smoking outside when no one is around.

        • JovialMicrobial
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’d rather be near someone vaping than a drunk person.

          The vaping I can walk away from, but a drunk driver could kill me.

          I find public drunkenness to be more deadly and problematic than vaping, but that just my opinion regarding public health issues.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              No, but they could at least show some consistency.

              At the moment it is all focussed on tobacco and almost none on alcohol except during driving.

            • JovialMicrobial
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s not a competition, but priorities. The things that kill innocent people should be higher on the list when writing new policies. Clearly the policies in place are not enough to prevent drunk driving and people are still getting killed from it. It’s still a problem and has been a problem and we should focus on that more than we currently are.

              If people are still driving drunk with it being illegal and we can’t even get that under control with current laws, how can we expect the new laws regarding vaping to be productive?

              And tbh this is quite personal. I’ve lost a friend to drunk driving about every 2 years since I turned 18. My friend’s alcoholic father murdered him when I was younger. I’ve seen nothing good come from that shit and it destroys lives. I don’t see vaping as even remotely comparable to the destruction alcohol can do.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Then most certainly can ban it altogether, and as a smoker I wish they fucking would. Force my ass to not be able to buy them anymore.