• deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    In what way is it antisemitic?

    If anything, it’s erasure of the non-Jewish victims of the holocaust.

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Português
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If anything, it’s erasure of the non-Jewish victims of the holocaust.

      But this is a common practice these days.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    (Probably) No, it isn’t.


    I want to be clear that it matters whether you were actually talking about the Holocaust. If you were using this as an analogy, about anything less traumatic than the actual Holocaust under Nazi Germany, then I would argue that it is anti-semitic, because it belittles the degree of horror that occurred. Don’t compare other things to the Holocaust, that’s shitty.


    The following assumes you were actually talking about the Holocaust (EDIT: or something equally bad):

    Does it erase Jewish culture, history, or trauma? No, it’s clearly doing the opposite of that: affirming the trauma.

    Does it dehumanize Jews? No. It’s neutral to the humanity of Jews, except insofar as it’s clearly meant to affirm the horrors of the Holocaust, which dehumanized and destroyed Jews and Jewish culture.

    Does it perpetuate a harmful stereotype? Nope! It might be considered a stereotype that Jews know Hebrew, but it’s not a harmful one, and it doesn’t make the claim that all Jews know Hebrew in any case. In fact, it strikes back at the idea that specific facts about Jews are even relevant to the conversation about the Holocaust.

    Most likely–if you were in fact actually talking about the Holocaust–the person you were arguing with just wanted you to go away, and gave you a bad faith rebuttal.


    Edit to add: OP added context, and this conversation was about the Uyghur genocide. Clearly, the intention here was not to belittle the horrors of genocide, since it’s actually a conversation about genocide. Not anti-semitic.

      • Quatity_Control
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not anti Semitic and even worse, it was a deft destruction of a gatekeeping argument.

      • chaircat@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll go against the grain here and say I do think it’s antisemitic, for precisely the reason outlined in the parent comment, even though they themselves are also giving you a pass.

        The genocide against the Jews, the Holocaust, was a situation where they were rounding up every single member of the ethnicity they could find in order to exterminate them.

        Even though we use the same word genocide for the Uighurs, no credible authority I’ve ever come across is alleging that is what is happening in Xinjiang. Uighurs still openly populate the province and roam the streets publicly.

        To compare them like this is to directly downplay the Holocaust in order to make a point on the Uighurs. In fact, I’d also say the widespread use of the word genocide for the Uighurs is the same, for reasons we’re seeing from the reactions of everyone else in this thread.

        • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m going to assume that you mean well, but aren’t well informed on this subject.

          Genocide isn’t just about killing people. It’s about destroying a people. The best example I know is how Canada treated/treats indigenous peoples.

          Forced sterilization and children removed from their culture are two ways that these peoples have been decimated.

          The Canadian genocide against the indigenous peoples has been recognized by multiple governments and falls within the common definition.

          The genocide during the Holocaust was immediate and violent like a bomb. The Canadian genocide is a slow burn like a forest fire.

          • chaircat@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s fair as a definition of genocide, though it isn’t the way I’m used to understanding the word.

            Precisely because of the differences though, I’d also find it in poor taste to make comparisons been the Canadian genocide against indigenous peoples and the Holocaust.

            • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a weird thing to compare. What’s worse for a people: an incredibly traumatic experience that shapes a culture for generations to come or an incredibly traumatic experience that shapes a culture for generations to come?

      • xantoxis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure. OP posed an interesting question and I liked having the opportunity to deconstruct it. Language is complex and depends heavily on context, and I’d love it if more people understood that.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That whole comment chain is a trainwreck filled with assumers, “ackshyually”-vomiting users, and frankly I wish that I didn’t read it.

    That said: no, you were not being antisemitic. In that context, by “don’t need to know Hebrew to know the Holocaust was bad”, you’re affirming that the Holocaust was bad, regardless of circumstantial knowledge that you may or may not have (such as knowing Hebrew). The opposite discourse (implying that the holocaust was not a big deal, or that it was good) would be antisemitism.

    The other user’s “ackshyually, Jewish ppl speak lotsa langs!” is correct, but contextually irrelevant. I simply fail to see how associating Hebrew with Jewish people would somehow denigrate them, even if they speak a multitude of languages. The other user is being at the very least disingenuous, if not worse (stupid).

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve always used “You don’t need to know how to fly a plane to know when a pilot is bad”. I don’t think the saying you posted is antisemitic though.

  • o0joshua0o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. It’s a fact. You also don’t need to know any other specific language in order to know that the Holocaust was bad.

    • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s more interesting that engaging with people that already agree with you. Up to a point ofcourse. Once you realize that nothings getting thru either way it’s often better to just move on.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t mind a reasonable person who disagrees and may see logic, or show me something I didn’t know.

        I’m not tryna to engage with people who are batshit fucking insane, tho. It will always end in a stalemate where everyone comes out feeling dirty and possibly even losing a few IQ points in the end.

      • AmidFuror@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are people on the Internet who disagree about things without either party being crazy. The folks in that thread were not such people.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Also “hell no”. Don’t argue with idiots, they’ll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always prefer:

      “Never wrestle with a pig because you’ll both get dirty and the pig likes it."

      • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t play chess with pigeons, they knock all the pieces down and strut around the board like they won it.

  • freamon@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know why I’m investing any time into what sounds like an unproductive conversation, but maybe the objection was to the assumption that all Jews know Hebrew (and associating Jews with Hebrew and vice-versa)

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fuck, I didn’t even learn enough Hebrew to read from the Torah for my Bar Mitzvah.

      I used a transliterated crib sheet.

      The rabbi (my cousin), when he found out, took me aside and said, “they won’t know what you did out there today, but GOD KNOWS!

      I was an atheist then and I’m an atheist now, so I didn’t give a fuck. I had a bar mitzvah to please my grandparents and get some presents and then nope the fuck out of religion for the rest of my life.

        • HelixDab2
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, but, OTOH, if you do know Hebrew, then the odds are pretty strong that you’re ethnically or religiously Jewish.

  • MonsieurHedge@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tankies are, in a sense, fascists or fascist allies. I wouldn’t take anything they say into consideration, the only thing they deserve is a bullet.

  • Tomassci@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they think that the holocaust was in any means okay, they’re the antisemite (+ spitting on several more minorities the nazis tried to get rid of).

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Damn those antisemitisms and their looks at note and raises eyebrow … acknowledged of the evils of Nazi Germany?”

  • Crozekiel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s people from Hexbear… From what I’ve seen, you can’t expect anything other than this from them. Just don’t engage them.

    • edric
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do they differentiate themselves between leftists/communists and actual authoritarian tankies? Or do they consider themselves the latter?