• Kusimulkku
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s just how the term is defined. Blame English language users, I guess

        • Kusimulkku
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah. Goes all under “science”

          • Dadifer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Problem solved then! Everyone just needs to do killing people science in order to make a living.

            • Kusimulkku
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Are you really upset that the term “science” includes even things we might personally find upsetting?

                  • Dadifer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Because our (US) current priorities fuel a worldwide arms race, while real investment in basic sciences would benefit humanity and keep postdocs from starving. The entire NIH budget for everything is $47 billion, while the Department of Defense budget is $825 billion, $145 billion of which for R&D. You think we should be spending $100 billion per year more on killing people than on making people’s lives better?