• EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So the complaint here is that there was a demo of a game that people got for free and they removed it. Did I get that correct?

    • Auster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No. You ignored the receipt part.

      • Auster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And also the part that they keep quiet about their issues that end up hurting customers, which, if it’s not clear, isn’t exactly uncommon.

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So they paid for it? Or it wasn’t a demo? Which part makes the answer a “no”?

        • Auster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It is a demo, it is free, but free titles are treated the same in the users’ accounts. So if the user didn’t want a content removed from his/her account, they should not have done it. And the type of question you made before is usually followed by “but if it’s free, then there’s no problem”, so my answer was meant also as an anticipation of that.

          • EatATaco
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            And the type of question you made before is usually followed by “but if it’s free, then there’s no problem”

            Whether it is a problem or a violation of their principle seems subjective and up to the individual. But it’s certainly an important factor to note, if we are going to be calling them out for hypocrisy.