Just started getting this now. Hopefully it’s some A/B testing that they’ll stop doing, but I’m not holding my breath

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yep. I use Noscript and DDG Lite by default. Just putting into duckduckgo: !g <your search goes here> will search google without having to turn JS on…looks like Duckduckgo wins again, even when it comes to using google, lol.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I get a notification every month telling me that they will charge me for my monthly Kagi subscription and every single month i feel the same:

      ‘Totally worth it!’

      • datavoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I feel like their pricing would make more sense if you could just pay for your usage, rather than forcing a subscription

        • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          They do have different tiers depending on your search volume and features, so in a way they already have this. I’d hate to have to go through checkout every time i did a search.

          • drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Why do you think you have to go through a checkout?

            They could just pool your owed money and then charge you that at the end of the month, or let you maintain a pool that you throw money into that they take from as you use it.

            • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              They have 100, 300, and unlimited for $0, $5, and $10

              How much would you be willing to pay per search? And do you know how many searches you make every month?

              For me, i pay not for the searches as such, but to not be tracked and be shown more ads than search results

              • datavoid@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                41 minutes ago

                I haven’t been using kagi long enough to really understand how it works yet, but it’s my understanding that they want you to pay every month, even if you had remaining searches from the previous month.

                If I pay $5 for 300 searches, why does it matter if I do them within a time frame? When someone isn’t’ searching, they aren’t really costing Kagi anything.

                Alternatively, let people pay 1.6 cents per search (or 1.8 cents or something).

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Google is no longer a Search Engine. It is a commerce/purchase search. It’s nothing more than ads and corporate results to purchase goods & services. Google Shopping has taken over Google.

  • perishthethought
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I hate how these kinds of messages never explain WHY. It’s just “Do it. Do what we tell you.” 💀

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Probably because 99.999% of users already use JS and dedicating a web page to it is already more work than they needed to put into it

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think it’s just to avoid explaining why, and how they harvest your data. That said, I also hate how a lot of errors of the big corpo are just like “This site has an error” no error-code, no further feedback what to do etc.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      BOW TO YOUR MASTERS, AND SUCK OUR DICK!!!

      I remember 10 years ago looking at a calculator app in the android app store, and seeing the permissions. And thinking “WHY THE FUCK DOES A CALCULATOR NEED MY LOCATION, AND ACCESS TO MY PHONE CONTACTS???”

      Fuck THAT.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I run NoScript, which blocks all JavaScript. I manually allow websites as I need it. It blocks all kinds of annoying nonsense while I browse.

    • Faresh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I installed NoScript just a few days ago, because I’m forced to use a really weak computer that struggles to even browse the modern web. I feel like NoScript improved it a lot, and while quite a few websites broke (including lemmy) (but most will still display the content), I just set the ones that I need working to trusted, but the performance is still good (I should note I’m also using it in conjunction with an automatic tab discarter).

      I however also don’t directly use Google. Both SearX and Yandex don’t need javascript, so I’m unaffected by these news, despite being a bit mad about it as a reflection of the direction the web is going as a whole.

    • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I started disabling JavaScript by default with uBlock Origin a few months ago. I am surprised to report that a bunch of sites work fine without JavaScript.

      There are definitely some sites that actually need it, and for those, it’s just one click to permanently allow for that site. But most of the sites I need work better with just CSS and HTML because there are no stupid nags or social media sign-in buttons that pop-up anymore.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    DuckDuckGo doesn’t ;)

    By the way, in my browser, the title of this post shows up as

    Google now requires Javascript in c/mildlyinfuriating

    which shocked me a little.

    • abbadon420
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Sundar Pichai is the admin for this community, didn’t you know?

    • Mwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      i use startpage ;)

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m just kind of surprised Google still worked without JS up until now. The people who don’t have Javascript enabled are such a tiny sliver of market share that Google may as well serve them a broken web page.

    I think Duckduckgo still supports searching without Javascript, though you may need to wait for a meta refresh when you use the standard search engine integration, so make sure you use the right URL in your search engine settings.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago
        <form method="GET" action="https://duckduckgo.com/">
          <input name="q" type="text"/>
          <button type="submit">Go</button>
        </form>
      

      This is a fully functional search bar. This is all it needs to be. It doesn’t need Javascript, only if you want suggestions.

      The last time I checked, Google still works if you simply pass your query in the URL using the q variable. Google has no need to enforce Javascript.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They need Javascript to serve users an experience that doesn’t look like it’s from the 90s. “You don’t need Javascript” is technically correct in the same way you don’t need Google because you can go look through an encyclopedia in the library.

        The kinds of people that disable Javascript probably don’t use Google anyway, and if they do, they’ll have their browsers so full of tracking protection that serving them costs more money than it earns.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Like lack of accessibility? I generally use reader mode, because it gives an actual good user experience rather than “one that doesn’t look like the 90s”. I’m not sure if it turns off JavaScript, but it clearly turns off the crap that it does. Maybe half of websites work that way, the rest I either skip or click to turn off reader mode.

          I just tried google, and reader mode is disabled, which is a problem for people with accessibility issues.

          Does EU have accessibility protections? Does google give the same ad filled, cluttered, crap as the rest of us? What if you try reader mode

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          It’s not about looks, it’s about functionality. I could add a hundred lines of CSS to make it sparkle without touching Javascript. I could think of a dozen convenience features that would require Javascript, but none that, if disabled, would prevent the search bar from functioning as a search bar.

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You’re not doing AJAX without Javascript, and that’s what the Google search site is optimised for. Plus, there’s no way to deal with the mandatory cookie consent popup without additional page loads either.

            You can do most of Google with CSS but you can’t do it easily without sacrificing functionality and Google doesn’t care about the people without Javascript anyway. Why invest time and effort into making this stuff work for customers that don’t earn you anything? It’s not an open source nonprofit that cares about its users, we’re talking about Google.

    • x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They don’t need javascript to serve their website, and their website hasn’t really been updated all that much. So there wasn’t really any reason to stop supporting it.

      This change is very likely meant to be against privacy respecting users.

  • Mwa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    they def wanna maximize data collection with javascript