• Trespasser 🥉@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Windows Recall today: Your data is private and stays on local machine.

    Recall after 2 years: We may use your data to train our AI models, improve our services and personalize your experince.

    • Railcar8095
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Best part? It’s using your hardware and electricity to train the models.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Recall after 2 years: Your personalized ads are generated on device based on preferences detected by Recall and our partners. Recall shares these preferences with Microsoft and our 23,671.5 partners and 16 nation-state partners around the world to better serve you <3.

    • Vince@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Interesting way to put it. The first thing it made me think is that if they did the 2nd part entirely within your PC, would it be ok privacy-wise, and would the consumers be ok with it?

      I haven’t looked into the current iterations options, but I think I still want the option to turn it off. Personally I’m less concerned with privacy and more concerned with it using up my computers resources.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Nah. Even if it’s local, I’ll burn my CPU cycles on what I want to, thanks. That’s like installing a bitcoin miner in your PC and claiming, “But it only runs in the background.” Fuck off and buy your own hardware, Microsoft.

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Even if the storage were strictly local, there would still be some privacy concerns. Hackers can’t steal data that isn’t there.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Even if all the processing remained on my devices, I still wouldn’t want or trust it. Microsoft could change that policy at any time, claim something like my logging in to my local account constituted agreeing to their new terms, and expose screenshots of my password manager in an unsecured public data store.

        Fuck Windows Recall, and fuck Microsoft generally for being so fucking awful to their customers but mainly fuck them for forcing me to finally make good on my threat to switch to Linux. I’ve been using Windows for over thirty years and switching off their spyware for ten, but this is the final straw.

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I ditched Microsoft on my new build back in Feb. I installed Mint and it’s been a really smooth transition for me. I can still do everything I used to, although I know there are some use cases where it’s a problem for people. All the games I’ve tried run well.

          But it does give me peace of mind that someone isn’t going to change my settings in a way that benefits them in a patch. I feel like I’m working with my OS to get things done instead of wrestling against what some corporate MBA wants.

        • Trespasser 🥉@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Fuck Windows Recall, and fuck Microsoft generally for being so fucking awful to their customers

          Always has been.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, there’s a bigger context that you’re not considering: enterprise IT orgs in privacy-sensitive/confidential domains.

        This whole feature is an absolute non-starter in biotech, defense, finance, and a bunch of other industries. It’s an infosec nightmare. Legal teams will categorically refuse to allow W11 to be installed simply due to the legal jeopardy it would put their own orgs in, since it implicitly trusts MS with who the fuck knows how much data exactly.

        I continue to be shocked and baffled that MS isn’t taking their stance on this product as an “always-on” thing back to the drawing board.

        • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I consult in some companies that don’t even allow copy/paste in outlook. Like, these are actually MS security policies that can be set.

          How in all of the actual fucks could they allow MS to see everything on your screen.

          I agree with your non starter assessment.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        if they did the 2nd part entirely within your PC, would it be ok privacy-wise, and would the consumers be ok with it?

        I mean Chrome works exactly like that now so, yes?

        Depends on how you define “okay”. Do people understand how it works, and want it to work that way? Absolutely not. Even if they did, would they do absolutely anything to change it? Also no. And that’s talking about software that has a dozen excellent and free alternatives.