As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

  • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    What message would we be sending if our replacement for them is a guy that wants Isreal to “finish the job” with it? Killing fewer people matters more than accountability

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There is not a big difference between one who say finish the job and one who doesn’t say it but give every resources for Israel to finish the job

    • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The message would be that voting Americans are not okay with genocide. Harris is actually culpable, while the idea that Trump would be significantly worse for the Palestinians and Lebanese is just hypothetical. Trump is actually the lesser of two evils this time. The allegations against him don’t amount to genocide by a long shot.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The message will be that Americans chose the guy who is complaining that the massacres are going too slowly

        Remember that he was ardently supportive of the Saudi bombing campaign in Yemen when he was president. We have seen how he handles this situation. He is absolutely not a lesser evil here.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Why is his backing of the Saudi campaign in Yemen not enough to you? The war has a far higher civilian death toll than Israel’s current actions do, the Saudi forces in the area have a long record of likely war crimes including bombing a school bus full of children in Dahyan and declaration of an entire city of 50,000 people as a military target, Trump actually vetoed congress to prevent them from stopping arms sales to SA, and dozens of actual direct American drone strikes were carried out under Trump’s presidency.