Had this happen at work today and my colleagues looked at me like I was a madman for tying both shoes again, instead of just the one that got loose. But doing both shoes again just makes more sense, because you ensure both shoes are equally tight again.

Am I just weird for doing this?

  • autumn@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    I only re tie the loose one, I’ve never heard of anyone redoing both. But your logic is sound. 😆

    • Rachelhazideas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I retie both about half the time because often times when one side comes loose, the other side is close to being undone. That way I don’t have to bend down twice in a short time (I have chronic pain).

  • LemmyLefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    I usually start off intending to only retie, then I walk around for a bit, get annoyed, and do the other one.

    Your strategy of accepting the inevitable makes more sense which is why I will promptly forget it.

    • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is almost the exact reply I was about to write.

      The difference is that if I was in a hurry to do something right before it came loose I will only tie the one, and go back for the other one the time pressure was over.

      But that’s probably true for all of us, so kinda redundant.

  • GCanuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s your job?

    I do this too, but only after a few years of IT where I learned that if one thing breaks it’s counterpart would soon break so might as well fix/replace while I’m working on the original problem.

  • ValiantDust@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can see your point, but tying both shoes would never ever have occurred to me as an option (unless I noticed the other shoe getting loose too). So I get your colleagues’ surprise.

    • kvan@kbin.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ian’s here, and same. It’s so crazy that these knots which really aren’t harder to learn, aren’t the ones taught to kids.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    you buy shoes without laces. last couple pairs of shoes I’ve had have had no laces and it’s really nice

  • Sendbeer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    You might try making one small change in the way you tie your shoe and you will find you rarely have them come undone.

    Yes, there is a Ted Talk for tieing shoes.

  • lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ehh… I’ll give the other one a tug to make sure it isn’t loose. But I’m not going to untie and retie it unless I have to.

  • Sam@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If there’s a big difference in how tight both shoes are I’ll do the 2nd as well.

  • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Step 1: get Blundstones for work and never worry about laces again!

    Otherwise, I only tie the affected shoe unless it’s clear that the unaffected one is compromised.

    Please tell me you didn’t start with the untied lace. If I saw you notice one of your shoes were untied and you started by un/retying the other one first I would immediately and permanently be convinced you were, or are about to become, a serial killer.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would never retie a shoe that’s tied, but also I can never get my shoes the same tightness anyway so I have no motivation to try. My feet are a little over half a US shoe size different.