back in my map era, we’re ukrainemaxxing right now
Declarations of the imminent doom of Ukraine are a news megathread specialty, and this is not what I am doing here - mostly because I’m convinced that whenever we do so, the war extends another three months to spite us. Ukraine has been in an essentially apocalyptic crisis for over a year now after the failure of the 2023 counteroffensive, unable to make any substantial progress and resigned to merely being a persistent nuisance (and arms market!) as NATO fights to the last Ukrainian. In this context, predicting a terminal point is difficult, as things seem to always be going so badly that it’s hard to understand how and why they fight on. In every way, Ukraine is a truly shattered country, barely held together by the sheer combined force of Western hegemony. And that hegemony is weakening.
I therefore won’t be giving any predictions of a timeframe for a Ukrainian defeat, but the coming presidency of Trump is a big question mark for the conflict. Trump has talked about how he wishes for the war to end and for a deal to be made with Putin, but Trump also tends to change his mind on an issue at least three or four times before actually making a decision, simply adopting the position of who talked to him last. And, of course, his ability to end the war might be curtailed by a military-industrial complex (and various intelligence agencies) that want to keep the money flowing.
The alignment of the US election with the accelerating rate of Russian gains is pretty interesting, with talk of both escalation and de-escalation coinciding - the former from Biden, and the latter from Trump. Russia very recently performed perhaps the single largest aerial attack of Ukraine of the entire war, striking targets across the whole country with missiles and drones from various platforms. In response, the US is talking about allowing Ukraine to hit long-range targets in Russia (but the strategic value of this, at this point, seems pretty minimal).
Additionally, Russia has made genuine progress in terms of land acquisition. We aren’t talking about endless and meaningless battles over empty fields anymore. Some of the big Ukrainian strongholds that we’ve been spending the last couple years speculating over - Chasiv Yar, Kupiansk, Orikhiv - are now being approached and entered by Russian forces. The map is actually changing now, though it’s hard to tell as Ukraine is so goddamn big.
Attrition has finally paid off for Russia. An entire generation of Ukrainians has been fed into the meat grinder. Recovery will take, at minimum, decades - more realistically, the country might be permanently ruined, until that global communist revolution comes around at least. And they could have just made a fucking deal a month into the war.
Please check out the HexAtlas!
The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Open hexbear
see map
Feb 2022Article
The president-elect’s approach raises questions about the implications of utilizing military personnel in several activities, particularly in the context of immigration enforcement.
In a significant development regarding immigration policy, President-elect Donald Trump confirmed on Monday that his controversial plan for mass deportations of undocumented immigrants will involve a national emergency declaration and the mobilization of military resources. This announcement has sparked intense debate and concern among various sectors of the American public, as well as human rights organizations.
In an early-morning post on social media, Trump responded affirmatively to a conservative activist who claimed to have heard reports about the potential use of military forces in deportation efforts. Trump’s succinct reply—“TRUE!!!”—has fueled speculation about the extent of his administration’s plans to address illegal immigration, a central theme of his campaign.
The president-elect’s approach raises questions about the implications of utilizing military personnel in domestic law enforcement activities, particularly in the context of immigration enforcement. As Trump prepares to take office, he is also focusing on his Cabinet selections, with more announcements expected in the coming days. His earlier choices have faced significant scrutiny and backlash.
The prospect of deploying military forces for mass deportations has alarmed many advocates for immigrant rights, who argue that such actions could lead to widespread fear and instability within communities. They contend that using the military in this capacity could violate civil liberties and undermine the rule of law. Additionally, there are concerns about the potential for increased tensions between immigrant communities and law enforcement agencies.
As the nation grapples with these developments, it remains to be seen how Trump’s administration will navigate the complex landscape of immigration policy and what impact these decisions will have on millions of undocumented immigrants living in the United States.
Some combat footage for today from the special military operation.
A recent Russian Lancet strike destroyed another US-supplied M142 “HIMARS” launcher in Zaporozhye oblast: https://southfront.press/in-video-russian-lancet-destroyed-himars-mlrs-in-zaporozhie-region/
A Russian drone destroyed a large group of Kiev regime invaders in Kursk oblast (18+): https://southfront.press/in-video-group-of-ukrainian-soldiers-destroyed-by-russian-drones-in-kursk-region/
Russian flags are now flying over the Chernigov oblast villages of Gremyach and Muravyi (in northeastern Ukraine): https://s5.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Muravyi.mp4?_=6
Russian drones pounding Kiev regime positions near the Kiev-occupied DPR city of Chasov Yar: https://s5.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Chasiv-Yar.mp4?_=3
Paraguayan President Santiago Peña (Colorado Party) was hospitalized in Rio de Janeiro after experiencing chest pains during the G20. Peña was attended to by the G20 medical team, who detected a change in his Electrocardiogram. Two days ago, Peña turned 46 years old.
Gangs looting Gaza aid operate in areas under Israeli control, aid groups say
A U.N. memo obtained by The Post concluded that gangs “may be benefiting from a passive if not active benevolence” or “protection” from Israel’s military.
One gang leader, the memo said, established a “military like compound” in an area “restricted, controlled and patrolled by the IDF.”
Israel is stealing what little aid they “let through”.
How is Palestine going to deal with this?
The Palestinians can’t deal with it effectively while occupied. The idf bombs resistance forces guarding aid shipments and leaves them ripe for looting by the gangs. As always, the only effective way of dealing with it is by abolishing the state of Israel and giving sovereignty to the Palestinians
The same way Afghanistan dealt with it, buying off bandits willing to work for Fatah until a worse unifying force takes over.
And as with the West Bank, they are creating non-government groups to do the dirty work and the IDF just watches and protects them.
Spirit airlines filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy
Finally, material proof of God’s judgment on this earth
So they lied about why they stopped flights to haiti
BYD has now produced 10 million electric and hybrid cars.
I want a cheap Chinese EV so bad
When anyone mentions (Trump) tariffs irl I’m like, I already couldn’t buy a Chinese EV under Biden.
SORRY BUT
THE POLLUTION WILL STOP
Now if only something could be done about the particulates created by tire wear.
Electric tanks incoming
deleted by creator
Replace all roads with tracks. And all cars with some other type of car. Call them train cars.
BUT AT WHAT COST!!!
https://youtu.be/4GZwqEG3AL8?si
Li Jingjing on Chinese electric vehicles
Support for deportation of illegal immigrants can vary from 62% to 33% depending on how the question is asked
I was looking for something like this, thanks. Still pathetic that average voter equates illegal immigrants with jobless criminals by default.
Fascist Italian lady who’s nice to me:
Fascist Argentine man who’s very rude and smells weird and fucks his sister and has cloned dogs or whatever:
Oom Cyril Ramaphosa lmao. Looks like a movie poster for a knockoff action film.
Putin and Scholz Reconnect: A Dialogue on Ukraine and Other Matters - Telesur English
Article
In the conversation, Putin also addressed the current crisis in Ukraine, noting that it is a consequence of NATO’s aggressive policy, which seeks to establish an anti-Russian presence on Ukrainian territory while neglecting Russia’s security interests and violating the rights of Russian speakers in the region.
Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone conversation with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz this Friday, marking their first dialogue in two years. During this call, the two leaders exchanged views on the situation in Ukraine.
Putin reiterated that Russia is ready to resume negotiations that had been suspended by the Kyiv government, based on proposals previously submitted in June by the Russian Foreign Ministry.
The Kremlin issued a statement emphasizing that Russia has never closed itself off to the possibility of dialogue and that the conditions for negotiations are well known.
hese conditions include the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, as well as from the regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson.
Additionally, the need for Ukraine to adopt a neutral status was mentioned, along with the denazification and demilitarization of the country, together with the lifting of sanctions imposed by the West.
In the conversation, Putin also addressed the current crisis in Ukraine, noting that it is a consequence of NATO’s aggressive policy, which seeks to establish an anti-Russian presence on Ukrainian territory while neglecting Russia’s security interests and violating the rights of Russian speakers in the region.
Bilateral relations were also discussed, with Vladimir Putin assessing the unprecedented weakening “in all directions as a result of the unfriendly behavior of the German authorities.”
“It was stressed that Russia has always strictly complied with its contractual obligations in the energy sector and is willing to cooperate mutually beneficially if there is interest on the German side,” said the Chancellery.
“Reconnect”? more like “talk past each other.”
Westerners are incapable of acknowledging what Putin is saying and responding to it. It’s just that “don’t look like anything to me” stare from Westworld.
I really don’t believe that Russia’s red line about long range missiles is a bluff. Putin specifically said that such attacks would mean direct conflict with NATO. Russia’s nuclear doctrine was changed to authorize the use of nuclear weapons in response.
Russia’s actual response (probably not nukes) remains a mystery, but I bet that they have something planned, and will do it if necessary. Of course, this will only happen if Ukraine actually launches the missiles.
The vibes I’m getting make me think that Ukraine may attempt massive combined missile/drone strikes on Russia, including Western weapons. I sure hope they don’t try that, because Russia could genuinely consider that an existential threat worthy of using nukes over.
Russia opening up the conflict to one with NATO makes less than no sense. It would be actively detrimental to their goals in Ukraine. I could see Russia striking some covert NATO forces inside Ukraine in retaliation, but anything major would allow forces from e.g. Poland to enter into the conflict and extend it at a time where Russia is cruising towards inevitable victory, and outright military defeat of NATO would either take decades or result in nuclear war. Neither of which would be sensible.
Russia is boiling Ukraine’s and NATO’s frogs far more effectively than they are boiling Russia’s. There’s a similar dynamic at play with Iran and Israel, where Israel is like Ukraine and Iran is like Russia. Iran has no need to imminently strike Israel and destroy them because Hezbollah, Hamas, and Ansarallah are (however unfairly to the populations of Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen) are boiling Israel’s frog far better than Israel and the US are boiling Iran’s.
Ukraine’s constant attempts to get the US and Europe involved in the war mirror Israel’s constant attempts to get the US involved in the war, and Russia’s willingness to be patient and accede to a degree of humiliation in return for a successful long-term plan also strongly mirror Iran’s patience and somewhat embarrassing moments (trying to make a deal which delayed the strike on Israel a month or two ago). Neither Russia nor Iran can simply put up with countries constantly trampling over their red lines and so have to make big displays occasionally, but otherwise are content with how the geopolitical situation is progressing, I think.
In all: if you have time on your side, then tread carefully. If you do not, then flail wildly and go for million-to-one odds.
Again, Putin didn’t mince words or use vague language this time. He said long range strikes with Western weapons would mean war with NATO. Maria Zakharova and Dmitry Peskov have since pointed to that statement as Russia’s current stance.
It’s not about victory in the Ukraine war, but rather deterrence between great powers.
Personally, I think Russia should have drawn clear red lines much earlier, and followed through with severe, shocking responses immediately, as it’s the only language neocons understand. That said, I think this red line is real. The response may be underwhelming, but I bet there will be something.
I dont know what more they would do other then what they have been doing? They will still make territorial gains regardless of ATACMS missiles hittinG Kursk.
Seeing dipshits online cheering Biden on and talking about how epic he is to do “one last thing for Ukraine” got me feeling like I have the flu ngl
death cult behaviour
Sure is sad that our King got his brain melted by boiling oil in the siege and had to be put down like a sick dog, but at least he was so bloated and diseased that the enemy castle is rife with corruption and boils. Huzzah!
It isn’t a bluff, but they’re probably going to exercise restraint until they know what Trump will do once he gets in. They’ll start escalating if Trump continues the strikes, likely at American targets in the middle east.
You know things are in the shitter if the hope is for the guy that escalated shit with north korea and floats a war in mexico is the one to cool it down.
Trump actually cooled things down with DPRK and did a bunch of diplomatic breakthroughs because he doesn’t have a deep hatred for DPRK like seemingly every other person in US government.
Yeah I agree, I don’t think Trump has a huge problem with NK. It’s like one of his few not terrible things actually.
Trump is fixated on “taking the oil” and other resources, and DPRK doesn’t have anything he wants to take.
Every imperialist is fixated on natural resource and value extraction, Trump is just dumb enough that he says it directly instead of sugarcoating it in 100 layers of ideology about Democracy and Human Rights
My personal theory is that Trump fully buys all the bullshit being fed to him by his natsec advisors about Putin and Kim being strongman dictators ruling over their helpless brainwashed masses, but instead of having the proper liberal reaction of righteous indignation he’s like “Wow, cool!”
Or perhaps the spirit of Juche just lives within him
Or he just has a more realpolitik “get your hands dirty” view of power and doesn’t see much of a difference between himself and other leaders
He’s Donny Deals! Just wheeling and dealing all day long!
Good thing they are pretty much out of long range weapons and the capability to launch them
Russia destroys the us embassy in ukraineI honestly think ukraines strayegynfor a while has been to be able to use western weapons for escalators strikes so that other countries get dragged in and they don’t have to fight the war on their own.
Which makes sense, I’m getting pretty tired of Americans saying that every Russian citizen deserves to be burned alive and then have that death celebrated by the international audience because Russia is waging a war, but it’s ridiculous to suggest that America is invl9ved just because they’re supplying intelligence, communication, arms, personally, logistics and are now putting together strike plans to be used against Russia.
Ukraine gonna paint a big American flag on the side of it and strike all the most inflammatory targets they can come up with in hopes that Russia retaliated against us.
And honestly I think Biden wants to take revenge on everybody by getting us into a hot war right as Trump gets into office hoping everybody blames Trump like they did Biden.
the just-Kursk allowance seems like something Russia could safely ignore, it’s pretty laughable that Ukraine still seems to think occupying a couple villages will net them something substantial in the negotiations, if these missiles were capable of stymieing Russia’s liberating of the Kursk territory in the first place–which judging by ATACMS not slowing the Donbass front where they are already allowed to use them… seems doubtful
There is a nuclear reactor and a nuclear weapons research and storage facility in Kursk. Where do you think Ukraine wants to use its missiles?
Where do you think Ukraine wants to use its missiles
i mean if the idea is to get Kiev flattened then shooting at a nuclear weapon facility would be a good idea. i’m not sure they’re quite that suicidal
They bombed the ZNPP for 2 years straight. They have depopulated their nation and pushed every man into a meat grinder. They are entirely that suicidal.
i’m not sure they’re quite that suicidal
I feel like maybe you haven been paying attention. They aren’t “suicidal” in that they don’t consciously and actively wish to be dead but their track record seems to show that every time they make a decision they chose the thing that will hasten their own demise.
In deterrence theory, your policy has to be strictly applied lest your frog be boiled. Putin didn’t say “no long range strikes, except in Kursk”. He said “no long range strikes”.
at this particular time when Russia is clearly winning, meeting the escalation in a fair way could open up the way for more effectual escalation on NATO’s part, making it more difficult to achieve Russia’s goals. ‘Oh drat the wunderwaffen didn’t make Putin surrender’ is a less compelling battlecry to deploy NATO troops than ‘they shot down our oh-so-innocent and uninvolved AWACS unit’.
fuck you [adds another 3 months to the war]
Removed by mod
Big news
isnt this the guy who claimed its okay to misgender caitlin (i think thats the name) for voting
I mean it wouldn’t surprise me if he said that, but I don’t know.
Not news
Not news
Not news
Actively ruining the news mega
No main
The exact scope of the American Biden regime’s decision to attack Russia with ATACMS missiles is not known in detail. In an interview with state media DR foreign minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen has expressed disappointment in what he believes to be a limited scope of the planned attacks:
If it were true that the U.S. had lifted geographic restrictions, that would be good. But I have a sense that this is relatively limited and likely focused on Kursk. And that’s, of course, better than nothing,
(DR found it fitting to embellish Rasmussen’s statement by inserting a note about “Pentagon” claiming that there are 10,000 democratic Korean troops in the Kursk oblast. I have omitted it from the quote)
Even the Danish regime, who has been among the most bellicose, is now beginning to slowly realise that the west will not be able to impose it’s maximalist demands on Russia. Rasmussen is now talking about how the purpose of the American ATACMS attacks is not to achieve victory but to make sure that Ukraine has the “strongest possible position for when and if the dynamics of this war change.” He goes on to say that “It’s a sober prediction that this could happen sometime in the new year,”
Rasmussen continues:
President Zelensky has also stated that the war will likely shift to a diplomatic phase at some point. And it’s crucial that Ukraine has the strongest possible advantage in that scenario
…
One way to make a difference is to lift geographic restrictions (on the use of Western weapons). Unfortunately, I don’t currently see this happening one-to-one. But something is better than nothing,"
However, the Danish regime has yet to move to a more realistic position on the war. Rasmussen is mostly dismissive of German leader Olaf Scholz’ attempts to resume dialogue with Russia by making a phone call to Putin. Rasmussen says:
If the purpose was to persuade Putin to end the war, it clearly didn’t succeed. Because immediately afterward, we saw one of the most massive Russian attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure in a very long time
This, of course, is a deeply unserious statement that should be seen as a symptom of the butthurt many western maximalists must be experiencing these days.
Despite his bruised ego, Rasmussen is enough of an opportunist to realise that the reality of the war is shifting both on the ground and in the imperial court of Washington where the incoming Trump regime might be less keen to continue the war. He says that European countries needs to understand “what’s what” and says that “We must avoid a situation where we simply have no role to play. If the call aimed to ensure that, I’m more understanding”.
He adds:
There’s nothing from that conversation suggesting President Putin is remotely ready to negotiate."
He adds:
There’s nothing from that conversation suggesting President Putin is remotely ready to negotiate."
Only if by “negotiate” he means surrender. Which he likely does.
They always express disappointment so they can demand more ridiculous shit. I remember when they first started demanding tanks.
