Kidplayer_666 to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftimagemessage-square1717fedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down1316
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1imageLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftKidplayer_666 to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square1717fedilink
minus-squareGarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·11 months agoYou can start with unemployment rates
minus-squarerusticuslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoUnemployment rates are not poverty rates. And those have been pretty stable since 1950. Less than 4% in 2018 and 2019 for example. https://www.thebalancemoney.com/unemployment-rate-by-year-3305506
minus-squareCatradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoThe US standards for poverty have been lowered every few years, so it makes sense its low.
minus-squarerusticuslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoNegative. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States Corrected for the redesigned equation (see caption of Figure 4). It’s been more or less stable for 50 years.
You can start with unemployment rates
Unemployment rates are not poverty rates. And those have been pretty stable since 1950. Less than 4% in 2018 and 2019 for example.
https://www.thebalancemoney.com/unemployment-rate-by-year-3305506
The US standards for poverty have been lowered every few years, so it makes sense its low.
Negative. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States
Corrected for the redesigned equation (see caption of Figure 4). It’s been more or less stable for 50 years.