SUPPORT more videos like this at http://patreon.com/rebeccaSUBSCRIBE at http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=rkwatson+++Links + transcript ava...
  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    873·
    10 months ago

    This is such a disgrace. Naomi Wu is one of the most interesting personalities out there. Absurdly enough, she was always very careful to not paint China in a negative light. She also managed to show everyday life and culture in China from an inside perspective, which is rare enough. It’s a real shame and a huge loss to the maker community. Let’s hope this gets some publicity, which may help protect her.

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      175·
      10 months ago

      Can you elaborate? To me it reads like she outed herself by going against tencent, or more probably/accurately, her government and one of its convenience spyware. She had already said for many years that she was under scrutiny, and her assumption was that her western followers would somehow compel the CCP to back off.

      I’m not a hater, but for anyone paying attention that’s ludicrous. With her knowledge, she couldn’t be that naive.

        • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
          34·
          10 months ago

          Wasn’t she an open lesbian on YouTube? CCP thugs could have watched her channel and gleaned the same info.

        • u_tamtam@programming.dev
          243·
          10 months ago

          Ok, not to be pedant, but it’s her activism that got her in trouble, not Vice? Just trying to connect the dots between this message and the previous one.

          Also, not defending Vice, I did read the article and it looks like Naomi freaked out and lashed at Vice on social media before she even got to read the piece about her, which might have Streisanded the same things she wanted to keep under the rug (ironically and to the point, despite having watched many videos of her, it’s your post that made me aware of the matter of her sexuality, which I suspect not many of her followers in the maker space care about).

            • u_tamtam@programming.dev
              31·
              10 months ago

              and what’s worse, you’re very wrong.

              Fine, care to explain how? I’m legit curious (despite the hostile tone).

              Regarding the Vice piece, here’s what you find in it:

              But Wu’s form of activism can also be hostile and combative. She wields her impressive Twitter presence to confront people she disagrees with. I know this from personal experience, as Wu took issue with my reporting after I returned from China.

              Wu told me she didn’t want to discuss her marital status, but before publishing the piece, I followed up with her.

              […]

              At the same time Wu responded to me, she started tweeting about VICE. Over the next several weeks, Wu publicly shopped our correspondence to journalists and tagged me, my former colleague, my editor, and VICE in dozens of tweets; her followers sent me many more.

              In emails, Wu accused me of blackmailing her and writing a “hit piece.” Without having seen the story, she wrote that if I published the article under my byline, VICE “will throw you to the wolves.”

              “If you don’t believe me, I’ll direct my tweets to your name- see if they come help under the VICE brand or make an excuse why they should stay out of it so they can blame you later for acting alone and cut you loose- with a reputation written where it can never be erased as the female journalist who signal-boosts harassment campaigns against women in tech,” she wrote.

              Wu asked to see a draft of the story prior to publication, which we declined to do as it is against our editorial policy. She took issue with other standard editorial protocols, such as when a fact-checker reached out to other sources for this piece.

              “We just need whatever article you vomit out to determine in just how many ways you violated basic journalistic ethics,” Wu wrote in an email to my editor.

              I know this is one-sided, but if at least the chronology is correct, this seems overblown.

              This other piece below mentions her not so recent history of activism “conflicting” with the law enforcement of her country, this predates Vice (2018):

              https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes?

          • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
            257·
            10 months ago

            Ah yes. Let’s look at all the ways we can blame the victim and not the genocidal authoritarian Chinese government. Tankie gonna tank.

            • u_tamtam@programming.dev
              53·
              10 months ago

              You could just check my posts history before calling me a “tankie”, I even have this apparent habit of drawing hostility from anything lemmygrad and hexbear-related, which makes your comment extra funny.

              Then if you could please point-out what exactly I wrote that makes you think that I am blaming her (or anyone?), and for what (?), that’d be helpful.

              I know her works because they overlap with some of my hobbies, in other words, I “know” her for what she does, but not so much the side of her activism on social media. If I got myself trapped in some controversy, and that just mentioning some aspects of it is taboo, then so be it, I’ll make sure to stay away from the vendetta.

    • FurbyOnSteroids@sopuli.xyz
      96·
      10 months ago

      • Renowned Chinese maker Naomi Wu has been threatened and questioned by Chinese authorities, facing imprisonment if she continues posting openly online.

      • Wu has brought attention to privacy issues with popular third-party keyboards in China that could record keystrokes and send them to developers like Tencent.

      • Researchers recently confirmed this vulnerability in a report to Tencent, who were slow to address the problem.

      • Shortly after, Wu was detained and warned to limit her online discussions or face consequences.

      • Wu feels silenced and that Western audiences who once supported her have abandoned her.

      • The video creator blames Elon Musk for ruining Twitter and limiting their ability to stay connected to people like Wu.

      • Centralized social platforms play a role in protecting dissenting voices by giving them visibility and an audience.

      • Frequent disruptions to platforms force rebuilding connections and communities elsewhere.

      • Wu’s outspoken views on technology and politics in China came with risks, which authorities are now cracking down on.

      • There are calls to raise more awareness of Wu’s situation through media coverage and online sharing.

      (Used kagi summarizer for this)

      • CoderKatEnglish
        145·
        10 months ago

        Man, I utterly detest Musk and think he’s dumb as bricks, but blaming Musk for this feels like a big stretch. Not, you know, Tencent or the CCP?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zipEnglish
          7·
          10 months ago

          That part of the video is more “it sucks these rich assholes are ruining our ability to stay connected by destroying the experience we’d come to enjoy and become used to.” It’s not saying he meant it, just mentioning how hard it is to stay connected with people online while switching platforms, and how easy it is to lose track of things you found important before.

        • barsoap
          63·
          10 months ago

          I mean… we’re talking makers and hackers. If I was a Chinese cop I wouldn’t want to piss off a gazillion terminally online simps with the skills to fuck up your IT.

      • krolden@lemmy.ml
        45·
        10 months ago

        The video creator blames Elon Musk for ruining Twitter and limiting their ability to stay connected to people like Wu.

        lol

        • socsa@lemmy.ml
          6·
          10 months ago

          I mean it’s definitely true to some extent. The world’s autocrats hate Twitter.

    • Blursty@lemmygrad.ml
      353·
      10 months ago

      Just another moronic sinophobic horseshit story that appeals to spoilt yank bigoted children.