@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 25 days agoBoredom births creativitymander.xyzimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1927arrow-down115
arrow-up1912arrow-down1imageBoredom births creativitymander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 25 days agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareNaNlinkfedilinkEnglish39•25 days agoSection 702 says swearing on the internet is suspicious and worthy of intelligence targeting.
minus-square@stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglish9•25 days agoYou guys have rules for when the govt targets you for intelligence? \meme
minus-square@Zerush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-225 days agoIt’s hilarious that a gov targets your intelligence when itself needs a service for this in several agencies https://www.dni.gov
minus-square@stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglish2•25 days agoI think organization of intel is always a good idea - wasn’t aware of this “area” per se tho! Thank you for sharing
minus-square@Seasoned_GreetingslinkEnglish21•25 days agoThe truth is this is a repost of a huge number of reposts. I think I saw this for the first time like 10 years ago. Somewhere down the line this most likely got posted to a mom group or something where it was censored and nobody bothered to uncensor it.
minus-square@PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish3•25 days agoI think I saw the original urbex pictures from the house. I vaguely remember it. Wonder who broke the golden rule and removed it.
minus-square@Zozano@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish11•25 days agoExcuse you, please censor your f**king words, cunt.
minus-square@AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•23 days agoOh dear, you left it in the open. Now you’ve done it.
minus-square@FozzyOsbournelinkEnglish7•25 days agoBecause we’re not children whose precious eyes need shielding from the big scary word
minus-square@grrgyle@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish2•25 days agoOk, whether it’s blurred or bleeped makes no difference to me. Other people finding a word like fucking objectionable doesn’t offend me
minus-square@Zerush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•24 days agoI find it much more annoying and insulting to put a beep over a word in American videos, if they did this in Spanish videos, you would miss half the dialogue.
Why censor the word ‘fucking’?
Section 702 says swearing on the internet is suspicious and worthy of intelligence targeting.
You guys have rules for when the govt targets you for intelligence?
\meme
It’s hilarious that a gov targets your intelligence when itself needs a service for this in several agencies https://www.dni.gov
I think organization of intel is always a good idea - wasn’t aware of this “area” per se tho! Thank you for sharing
Sir, this is a Christian Lemmy Server.
I’m dudeist
The truth is this is a repost of a huge number of reposts. I think I saw this for the first time like 10 years ago.
Somewhere down the line this most likely got posted to a mom group or something where it was censored and nobody bothered to uncensor it.
I think I saw the original urbex pictures from the house. I vaguely remember it. Wonder who broke the golden rule and removed it.
Excuse you, please censor your f**king words, cunt.
Oh dear, you left it in the open.
Now you’ve done it.
Why not?
Because we’re not children whose precious eyes need shielding from the big scary word
Ok, whether it’s blurred or bleeped makes no difference to me. Other people finding a word like fucking objectionable doesn’t offend me
I find it much more annoying and insulting to put a beep over a word in American videos, if they did this in Spanish videos, you would miss half the dialogue.