Western media have finally change course. They are now admitting that the much promoted Ukrainian counter-offensive has failed. In fact, the acknowledge that it never had a chance to win in the first place.

The Hill, the Washington Post and CNN now agree that the Ukrainian army will never achieve its aims.

western MSM has a rare encounter with reality!

That makes it difficult for the Biden administration to get Congress approval for $24 billion in additional ‘aid’ to Ukraine. It does not make sense to pay for a cause that is evidently lost.

b seems overly hopeful regarding the rationality of US congress, but i think hes right- why would we throw more money at them, US politicians have made it clear they do not support bringing Ukraine into NATO if they do not win this conflict. of course, US politicians are prone to lying and misleading

Nothing has come from the ‘peace conference’ which Saudi Arabia arranged on Ukraine’s behalf

lol. lmao even. props to big dog MBS for trying

Despite the onslaught of bad news the Ukrainian army is still trying to take Russian positions in the south and east of Ukraine. But it simply does not have enough in men and material to break through the lines.

Even if they would manage to get a local breakthrough there are not enough reserves to push for the necessary follow up. Just one of the NATO trained brigades has still been held back. All others have been mauled in their various deployment zones.

nothing has changed it seems

In the northeast around Kupyansk the Russians have started their own offensive which has the Ukrainians on the run. Ukraine has ordered the evacuation of the area

But Kupyansk is a Russian city and people refuse to leave.

show this to the libs claiming Russians are committing genocide in the regions they capture. curious that these civilians are content with Russian occupation when you believe what western media claims

The Russian campaign is slowly speeding up. As the Ukrainian Strana.news reports (machine translation):

Also in Ukraine, it is recorded that from Kupyansk to Bakhmut, Russia has increased the number of attacks.

"Over the past month, the total number of attacks in the Kupyansk, Limansky and Bakhmut directions has grown significantly. In July, during the week there were 6-6.5 thousand attacks, during the last week-9 thousand attacks, " - said the representative of the National Guard Ruslan Muzychuk.

According to him, the Russian Federation does not experience “shell hunger”.

Aviation is also actively used, and over the past few weeks, more than 50 air attacks have been taking place every day, and sometimes more than 80.

That is bad news for the Ukrainian side which lacks the reserves to counter the Russian onslaught. There are also less weapons coming in from the West. F-16 fighter jets will be delayed for another nine months due to training issues. Tanks and other material are in short supply.

these supply issues sure bode well for the west’s performance in WW3 sicko-hyper

Strana also report of an interview with a knowledgeable Ukrainian soldier (machine translation):

Continuing the topic of the situation at the front, an interesting interview was given by a Ukrainian sniper fighting near Bakhmut with the call sign “Grandfather”. On the air of political scientist Yuri Romanenko, he was introduced as Konstantin Proshinsky (this is a pseudonym).

The fighter spoke in detail about his vision of the situation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Russian army.

  1. Mobilization. In his opinion, it is conducted incorrectly. Recruits are sent to the front who have never been trained, and they are often over 50 years old and with a whole bunch of diseases.
  1. No rotation. The soldier says that “the same brigades” are fighting at the front, and people are not taken out of the front line for six months or more. Whereas by Western standards, they can be kept in a war zone for no more than three months.
  1. Behavior of mid-and high-level commanders. According to Proshinsky, many of them are trying to arrange a “mini-Stalingrad” on the positions, forcing them to go into frontal assaults on well-fortified Russian positions.
  1. The Russian Army began to fight better.
  1. Proshinsky believes that Russia has not yet used much of what it has against Ukraine.

The soldier thinks that the Russians will not move from their positions and that a stalemate peace like in Korea would be the end result.

UAF in real dire times— recruiting the elderly, poor logistics, engaging the enemy at inopportune times, and Russia has yet to waver

I believe that to be wrong. Russia’s aim is to liberate at least the four regions that it has claimed for itself. For political reasons it can not stop before that is done.

Should the Ukraine continue to fight after that, Russia is likely to set new aims and take more land.

more editorializing, but it doesnt seem unreasonable. i thought Russia would stick to its original goal of Donetsk and Luhansk, but if Zaporizhzhia and Kherson are receptive to Russian governance, it would be foolish for Russia to give them up

    • ahshidahfuck [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      143
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I keep thinking “damn that’s a really good bit” and then I see the username and remember that we’re federated and it’s not a bit. Damn, that really sucks someone really thinks this.

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      1 year ago

      Edit: hilarious the number of authoritarian disinformation shills and bots freaked the fuck out by my comment. Suck. It. Bitches.

      smuglord

      • sempersigh [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        When they say bots do they literally mean that they think the comments are AI generated or something? Do they really think that highly of AI like as someone who has worked with it if someone had a script hooked up to gpt replying to all these comments it would be incredibly obvious

        On the other hand, perhaps they mean that we’re brainless automatons repeating le outlet propaganda mindlessly without nuance? That has to be the most quintessential example of projection on earth. Literally replying to links and sources with suck. It. Bitches lmfao

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I assume they’re pretty young and using it in the same way it’s used in games as an insult. Kind of like how “boomer” used to mean a specific generational cohort and now it just means “person I don’t like”

    • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did you coup their democratically elected leader in 2014 for democracy too?

      Is that why you sent them weapons to persecute an ethnic cleansing in their borders for eight years? For democracy?

      Americans are the most propagandized people in the entire history of the world.

    • SimulatedLiberalism [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hinge Points (Hexbear edition): Ukraine

      The events leading to the war in Ukraine did not happen overnight. It was the consequence of a decade of diplomacy failures, and was 100% preventable if only a couple things had gone differently along the entire chain of events.

      1 ) The 2013 Maidan coup in Ukraine would never have happened if everyone had just gone with Putin’s suggestion of holding a three-way meeting so they can revise the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement such that European goods could not flood the Russian market without paying for tariffs (due to Ukraine’s existing tariff-free agreement with Russia). Putin did NOT object to Ukraine signing the agreement, simply that they revise the clauses for the tariff-related issues. The EU declined to meet.

      Of course, the European imperialists got greedy and wanted to eat into Russia’s market, thinking that Russian economy is too weak to do anything against them and therefore ripe for bullying.

      2 ) The 2013 Maidan coup probably would not have happened if EU didn’t force Ukraine to take IMF loans.

      Ok, you’re Ukraine, signing the agreement with EU is going to lose you trade revenues with Russia if you don’t revise the clause of tariff, fine, but now you’re being forced to take IMF loans that demand cutting social spending and education as well? That’s just you signing your own slave contract.

      Ukraine’s then president, Viktor Yanukovych, whom I assure you was very pro-EU and not a Russian stooge in any way, was stumped by the demands and asked for more time to negotiate with Russia. He did not reject the EU agreement, nor did he take any deal from Moscow. He simply postponed signing the agreement, and that was enough to be couped by the fascists before he could do anything about it.

      Of course, the imperialists have always had in their minds the perfect economic warfare against both Russia and Ukraine. They simply couldn’t help not impoverishing the countries at their periphery through their cleverly-devised economic policies.

      3 ) The 2014 Ukrainian Civil War would most likely not have happened if the fascist coup regime didn’t ban Russian language in Donbass.

      Ok, so the coup happened, you’re now under a new management. Fine, but the fascists couldn’t help themselves by lashing out at the ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine. Literally one of the first things the coup regime did was to ban Russian language in Donbass. Clashes between both sides started to ramp up and the highly tense situation would quickly devolve into the Ukrainian Civil War.

      Russia was forced (by design, I should say) into the conflict because the Ukrainian army was being mobilized to fight against the Donbass separatists, a region where ethnic Russians are the majority.

      Of course, the imperialists couldn’t help it: they believed that they could cripple Russia’s economy by involving it in two fronts - Syria and Ukraine - at the same time. Surely Russia had no capacity to fight two wars at the same time? Crimea was immediately annexed by Russia for obvious reasons, and I still remember Western pundits laughing at Russia thinking that there’s no way they have the capability to build the Crimean Bridge.

      4 ) Implementing the Minsk agreements could have marked the peaceful ending to this conflict.

      Ok, the Ukrainian armed forces were defeated by the Donbass militia aided by Russian military in the civil war. A peace deal had been brokered. Russia said: “ok we don’t want to deal with this Donbass shit anymore, can you take them back please? Just promise not to commit genocide or ethnic cleansing in the region. We just want to continue doing business with Europe, we’ve been sanctioned enough and we really don’t want to get bogged down by this shit in Ukraine.”

      Minsk was supposed to be the path for a peaceful return of Donbass to Ukraine, but with increased autonomy to the local governments, so that nobody can impose a nation-wide ban on language and culture without regards for the people living in the regions.

      However, the fascists couldn’t help it and immediately broke the truce, leading to them being beaten once again. The German chancellor Merkel and the French president Hollande actually had to drag Putin back to the negotiation table and promised to be the guarantors of Minsk II: that Ukraine will really stick to the plan this time.

      Interestingly, both Merkel and Hollande have since admitted publicly in 2022 that the Minsk agreements were simply to buy time for Ukraine to be militarized. Why does Ukraine need time to militarize? There really is only one answer to this question: to militarily re-capture Donbass and Crimea instead of implementing the peace plan.

      5 ) NATO arming Ukraine exacerbated Russia’s security concerns

      Ok, so you have a peace plan, but instead of start holding talks toward a concrete resolution, what Russia saw was Ukraine being armed and trained by NATO over 7 years.

      Once again, Russia proved to be the idiot in this conflict by actually believing that Ukraine was ever going to implement Minsk agreement. And yes, Putin is an idiot. Surely his good friend Angela Merkel would never lie to him?

      Of course, the Western imperialists truly believe in the supremacy of NATO military equipments and tactics that if you have a fully NATO-trained Ukrainian army, they would be able to beat Russia’s obsolete military quite easily.

      I will also add that the Nazi regiments, now fully incorporated into the Ukrainian armed forces, have never been prosecuted for their atrocities committed against civilians in the Donbass. They were glorified as heroes in state media.

      6 ) Biden’s aggressive policy in Ukraine made Russia’s worst fear came true

      In 2021, the new Biden administration began to pivot aggressively against Russia. After the meeting between Biden and Zelensky (who was elected as a peace president and was supposed to bridge the divide between Ukraine and Russia) in Washington, the latter started to spout aggressive rhetorics that increasingly alarmed the Russians, such as talks about Ukraine joining NATO.

      That former Soviet republics joining NATO has always been the thorny issue for Russia since the end of the Cold War, and Ukraine was to be the center-piece of this increasing encirclement of Russia that has been ongoing since the 1990s. There is not a single government in Russia, whether they lean left or right, that will not be alarmed by this development, given their prior encounter with the Nazis some 80 years back. And it’s the same Banderites in Ukraine this time, not some generic fascists.

      7 ) The last ditch effort to stop the war

      At this point, at least for the Russians, it was pretty clear that the new administration is going to ramp up its belligerent foreign policy against Russia. There was only one last thing to do: a last ditch effort to persuade Washington to stop its aggression.

      The Russian diplomatic team prepared hundreds of pages of proposal, hoping to convince the other side of the seriousness of its security concerns, and Russia-US summit was conducted in June 2021 to resolve the crisis. Instead, the US sent Javelins and Stingers to Ukraine, first in August 2021, then in December - completely laughing in Russia’s face about their security concerns.

      Zelensky started to talk about joining NATO, commenting about abandoning the Budapest Memorandum that was the basis of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, the increased mobilization of military units towards the eastern front (Donbass), and the increased shelling of the regions by the Ukrainian side.

      The diplomatic solution has failed.

      • NoGodsNoMasters [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Zelensky (who was elected as a peace president and was supposed to bridge the divide between Ukraine and Russia)

        yea

        There was a reason Zelensky won about 90% of the 2nd round vote in Donetsk and Luhansk, while his majorities got slimmer and slimmer the further you went West, until you get to Lviv (reactionary capital of Ukraine), the only oblast he didn’t win.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Re: the same Banderites

        I think it’s important to note that the UON-B (B for Bandera) never had more than I think 20,000 members in Ukraine, and the fascist Ukrainian insurgent army, UPA I think? Never numbered more than 100,000 fighters before the Soviets crushed their insurrection. It’s utterly bizarre the degree to which a genocidal traitor with a tiny following has been elevated to a national hero with a broad following.

        Stingers

        Also worth mentioning for anyone who doesn’t know - Stingers, a Man Portable Air Defense System (MANPADS) and other anti-aircraft weapons are some of the most tightly controlled, important, and fraught weapons systems in the world short of weapons of mass destruction. The ability to reliably kill enemy aircraft is simply a necessity in modern combat. To give a state or non-state group additional air-defense assets is an enormous escalation of hostility. MANPADS are especially important because they’re a man-portable system. I think a Stinger team can be as small as two people. So a MANPADS team can pop up just about anywhere and kill a military or civilian aircraft. Non-state militants acquiring MANPADS is a constant security concern around the world. It’s a big deal.

    • Poison_Ivy [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. Is. An. Investment. In. Democracy.

      Investing in Democracy by immediately banning opposition parties in Ukraine and the current government being the result of a manufactured coup against an elected government.

      • Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually, it’s a result of dissatisfaction with that Government. Zelensky got popular for his reformist Plattform after all, promising among other things improved relations with Russia.

        He didn’t deliver, and before the war as I understand it, the popularity of “Servant of the People” was declining, as I understand it.

        • NoGodsNoMasters [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          the popularity of “Servant of the People” was declining, as I understand it.

          The Wikipedia chart for polling on what was supposed to be 2023 parliamentary election (unclear when it will actually happen but it’s definitely not as originally scheduled because of martial law):

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s at least rumors that the Banderites running the front told him to fuck off and remember his place when he tried to start negotiations to end the conflict.

    • Flaps [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m amazed how you libs always manage to write off anything that even moves slightly from the narrative provided by NATO mouthpieces as ‘bots’ or ‘shills’. It’s dehumanizing and only proves you’re so propagandized engaging with you is almost futile. Some comrades have taken the time to respond to your brainless comment with a wall of text giving a much broader view of the events that led to the war in Ukraine. I know you NAFO idiots don’t like reading, but please try. If you do, great. But I’m assuming you won’t, here is a pig. With. Poop. On. Its. Balls. PIGPOOPBALLS

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ukraine? The west? Democracy? Were you born yesterday? Since when has the west ever cared for democracy outside of propaganda value?

      Just going to post an excerpt of Samir Amin’s thoughts on this from the 2014 coup in Ukraine.

      1. The current global stage is dominated by the attempt of historical centers of imperialism (the U.S., Western and Central Europe, Japan—hereafter called “the Triad”) to maintain their exclusive control over the planet through a combination of:

      a) so-called neo-liberal economic globalization policies allowing financial transnational capital of the Triad to decide alone on all issues in their exclusive interests;

      b) the military control of the planet by the U.S. and its subordinate allies (NATO and Japan) in order to annihilate any attempt by any country not of the Triad to move out from under their yoke…

      1. The current development of the Ukraine tragedy illustrates the reality of the strategic target of the Triad.

      The Triad organized in Kiev what ought to be called a “Euro/Nazi putsch.” To achieve their target (separating the historical twin sister nations—the Russian and the Ukrainian), they needed the support of local Nazis.

      The rhetoric of the Western medias, claiming that the policies of the Triad aim at promoting democracy, is simply a lie. Nowhere has the Triad promoted democracy. On the contrary these policies have systematically been supporting the most anti-democratic (in some cases “fascist”) local forces. Quasi-fascist in the former Yugoslavia—in Croatia and Kosovo—as well as in the Baltic states and Eastern Europe, Hungary for instance. Eastern Europe has been “integrated” in the European Union not as equal partners, but as “semi-colonies” of major Western and Central European capitalist/imperialist powers. The relation between West and East in the European system is in some degree similar to that which rules the relations between the U.S. and Latin America! In the countries of the South the Triad supported the extreme anti-democratic forces such as, for instance, ultra-reactionary political Islam and, with their complicity, has destroyed societies; the cases of Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Libya illustrate these targets of the Triad imperialist project.

      What is in any way democratic about the above? What is democratic about the imperial triad ruling the world by force and instigating a coup in Ukraine to serve their own interests? Seems very authoritarian and the opposite of democracy to me.

      You can find the full summary here

    • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. Is. An. Investment. In. Democracy.

      Wow democracy defenders sure are bloodthirsty, how about we stop “investing” in the pile of bodies you’ve created in the name of a coup government that you call democracy?

    • AlicePraxis [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      1 year ago

      “democracy”

      The current Ukrainian government exists as a result of the Maidan coup that ousted a democratically elected president. This war would have never happened if not for that.

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        ·
        1 year ago

        Democracy means a western puppet regime, authoritarianism is when you don’t obey American marching orders to send half your country to certain death

      • I blame Vice and Netflix. People saw Euromaiden through Vice’s reporting and the documentary that was on Netflix and just assumed it was leftists in favor of democracy kicking out a Russian backed dictator.
        The wiki page on the coup even lays it out plainly. Straight up Nazis like the Misanthrope Division kicked out elected officials.

        • AlicePraxis [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          54
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Misanthropic Division” JFC never heard of that one before. as if they couldn’t make it any more clear they’re the bad guys

          • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep. A lot of the discourse around nazis in Ukraine focuses only on Azov battalion but i think that’s limiting discourse since it ignores Svoboda, C14, Misanthropic division, Kraken, right sector, patriot of ukraine, social national assembly, and countless others, many of which predate A.B. and go back to the 1990s or even earlier, like OUN-B, which goes back to nazi collaborators Yaroslav Stetsko and Stepan Bandera in WW2 and never stopped existing

    • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      michael-laugh

      I would say you have an infantile conception of geopolitics, but I would wager that most infants are more knowledgeable by way of ignorance.

      Let’s see, we have murderous dictator’s exile island, murderous dictator’s exile peninsula, Nazi shithole, etc etc etc

      Pick up a gun and fight, coward

    • Taiwan, South Korea, Poland

      One of these things is not like the other. South Korea and Taiwan are both areas that should be re-unified with the countries that amerikkka cut them off of, if there is a Formosan population to return it to that may be a solution with Taiwan as well. What’s your beef with Poland?

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why aren’t you at the front then, coward? You believe in the cause, yet you’re sitting here posting while people are being forced to fight and die on your behalf.

      • Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        If anyone’s going to attack Poland (which they won’t.) it’s gonna be from it’s own sabre rattling. There’s nothing more that pleases people from PO to PiS and anything inbetween than it’s neighbors getting losses, be it Germany, Russia, Belarus and any country that’s not in its own sphere of influence like the rest of the Reddit Belt

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly the USSR and the US both sitting on Europeans and forcing them to not slaughter each other for consecutive decades is probably the best thing that has ever happened to that barbaric, benighted continent.

          Well…

          Okay Lambec is also pretty cool.

      • pooh [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        They sure didn’t care about democracy when they were supporting military dictatorships in Taiwan, South Korea, and numerous other places.

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chile, Bolivia, Argentina, Brazil, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Cuba, Greece, Japan, Niger, Somalia, Australia (not military, but royal), Cambodia, Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Jakarta/Indonesia (this one ended in genocide), and thats still just scratching the surface.

    • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      1 year ago

      It amazes me the amount of people who don’t realize they could defend democracy better themselves by going to Ukraine and putting themselves on the front line.

      If you think the Battle For Democracy is so important, and that it’s going to be won at the cost of hundreds of thousands of dead Ukranians, go put your money where your mouth is. Stop shoving them into the meat grinder so callously and claiming that they’re heroes for Defending Democracy, whatever the fuck that even means. Go jump in with them and make a real impact. If it’s a cause you care about go participate

    • Teekeeus [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      1 year ago

      https://pnhp.org/news/gilens-and-page-average-citizens-have-little-impact-on-public-policy/

      In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule — at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes. When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites and/or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

      • Aabbcc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Democracy is when you vote once every 2 years to pick which of the people (who don’t represent your interests) you want to represent your interests :)

        Oh and then 9 people you didn’t elect will tell you what you can and can’t do

        THAT’S what’s at stake

      • boredtortoise
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a hopeful sentiment. If communism would win in Russia, they could retreat

        • GorbinOutOverHere [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Even if communists took power today, why the fuck would they? Crimea is still of utmost geopolitical importance, and Ukraine will go back to genociding Russians in the southeast if they “retreat”

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish someone would remind Brandon. The 21th century is going to be a nightmare unthinkable in human history no matter what, but it would be nice if we didn’t include a global thermonuclear war.

        • TheCaconym [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          it would be nice if we didn’t include a global thermonuclear war.

          I’m convinced they will

          When the crumbling of the empire becomes too obvious, they will

    • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      Billions must die for glorious US unipolar hegemony democracy. More blood for the blood God. More skulls for the skull throne.

    • ZapataCadabra [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was it democratic when Zelensky banned every socialist party in the country? Was it democratic when an unelected coup government in Ukraine banned the Russian language from official use, prompting the Russian majority regions to demand autonomy? Was it democratic when Zelensky was voted in on the promise of enforcing Minsk II which would have given autonomy to the Donbass and ended the civil war, but then he immediately reneged on that promise and continued to bomb his own country?

      The Russian Federation is by no means a force for good, but if you look at the US it has never “invested in democracy” because it doesn’t care about democracy. It cares about client states getting in line. Pakistan is only the most recent coup they’ve encouraged.

    • AOCapitulator [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Democracy is when rich capitalist nations fight each other to the death of innocent civilians

      name LITERALLY ONE TIME when the United states fought for and achieved gains for common people of a foreign land

      • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        WWII, by accident? it’s the only feasible example and even there I think you can argue that their actions after the war color the war itself in a less than positive light.

        • ZapataCadabra [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ww2 is interesting because yes that was the one war where the US was justified but they did it in a way that only benefited American interests. And also only after they were attacked first.

          • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            1 year ago

            yeah, that’s what I meant by “by accident”. they didn’t intend to do anything but further American interests, but stopping the Axis benefited everyone.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve heard that the US cutting off oil to Japan was intended to provoke a war. They didn’t know about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, but they were expecting Japan to take some kind of action because Japan needed access to more oil to maintain their empire.

        • YoungBelden [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          kinda sorta yeah, but also it was a sort of greek gift or trojan horse in that US’s participation seemed to largely set them up to be a world superpower after the end of the war. so fighting to protect investments, further other investments, lay the groundwork for modern imperialism as the new capital order. although I know saying “the US was acting in self-interest” isn’t saying much that we don’t already know lol

          edit: and y’all already talked about this further down the comment chain lmao, i shoulda read ahead first

    • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      Question for ya, a legitimate one.

      If Russia is so weak as to be apparently held in check and or clowned on by Ukraine, an army a fifth of its size, logically Poland or any other Russian border state would have nothing to worry about, right? They all have larger and better equipped militaries.

      If that’s the case, why do you think Russia can possibly be a threat to the west?

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those are bad examples of democracies, since Poland is captured by the right wing and Taiwan and Korea only swing left when there’s a popular uprising. These countries have elected bodies, but they don’t reflect the will of the people.

      I’d encourage you to take a look into the foundation of Taiwan and the Republic of Korea.

      As far as defending democracy, call me when New Zealand or Bolivia are under attack.

    • pooh [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You are aware that both Taiwan and South Korea were both US backed dictatorships that only embraced “democracy” relatively recent and after intense and sustained public pressure, right? And that the US/NATO had secretly worked to rig elections in Italy and Greece (at least this is what the CIA has actually admitted to)? The idea that the US or NATO cares about protecting democracy is a complete joke to anyone with even a basic knowledge of Cold War history. You really should do some serious research and educate yourself on the topic.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        South Korean “democracy” is about as sketchy as it gets, given the influence of cults on the government and the government’s general use of crackdowns to control the labor force. It’s still a very heavy handed government, even if the faces change once in a while.

        • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t it take untill Moon Jae-in for South Korea to have a president actually finish their term and not go to prison? Seems like a hell of a democracy if almost every leader goes to jail for massive corruption and being a puppet for Samsung / Hanwha corporations.

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      post-1991 Ukraine is a proxy of NATO. I feel bad for the people there, but not the government, or the US-backed reactionaries. The truth is, after the USSR was destroyed, former soviet countries like Russia and Ukraine became ruled by reactionary capitalists who bent the knee to the west, and the west did nothing in return but continue to expand NATO, and now pits former soviet countries against each other, getting thousands of people killed just to destabilize and privatize and loot the region even further. I hope one day you’ll be able to see through the veneer of “democracy” rhetoric and see this.