• NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I am familiar with the word. Read the first sentence of the wiki article. It is the destruction of the people. That would imply, by definition a decline in the population.

    Israel is not performing a genocide. Israel is defending themselves from people trying to destroy it.

    Nazi Germany tried to kill the Jewish people, and you will note the large population decline of Jews in Europe because of the mass killing of the Jews.

    The Palestinians on the other hand are attacking Israel and they get bombed in self-defense. Their goal is not destroying the Palestinians but only to destroy their ability to wage war against Israel.

    • karobeccary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      oh I see where you got it wrong! No, the decline or increase of a population has no bearing on genocide - it is the intentional killing of a group in whole OR IN PART.

      So the amount of babies born does not cancel out the killing of other members of the group, if the intention is to wipe out the group in whole OR IN PART.

      That is the definition of genocide, it does not in any way rely upon or even relate to the rate of birth!

      I’m glad we could clear that up, and as such that I am in fact correct that the actions of the apartheid state Israel DO in fact rise to the basic definition of the word Genocide, as defined by the common definition, the wikipedia article and the United Nations!

      • NeuromancerM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        In whole or part would imply a population decline.

        It is not genocide to defend yourself from terrorist attacks and rocket attacks.

        No, they do not rise to the basic definition. The UN has not declared it because it does not meet that standard.

        • karobeccary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It would seem to imply that wouldn’t it, but it doesn’t actually when you think about it. After all, the holocaust would still have been a genocide EVEN IF 6 million Jewish people were also born during world war 2. I’m glad I could help you through this misunderstanding!

          So once again, the birth rate is not at issue, has no bearing, and in fact has nothing to do with the definition of Genocide. It’s not the birth rate, thats not a thing, that has never been a thing, it does not and never has been a part of the definition of genocide.

          It has nothing, nothing, nothing, to do with the birth rate. I hope I have stated that clearly and politely :D

          • NeuromancerM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            You’re confused about what a genocide is. Yes, birth rate is defined in the phrase. Since the destruction of the group is the end goal, if they’re growing, then you are not doing a great job a genocide.

            SInce Israel does not have the goal of destroying the Palestinians, it isn’t genocide. It isn’t by definition, no matter how much you want to pretend it is. ]

            It is nothing more than self-defense from the the attack from the Palestinians. If they stopped attacking Israel, then Israel wouldn’t attack them.

            • karobeccary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Hey good news wintermute! The UN are currently calling on the international community to declare the events in Palestine as a Genocide! Here is a link:

              https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/11/gaza-un-experts-call-international-community-prevent-genocide-against

              Also, I checked the wikipedia article for the phrase “Birth Rate” and it does not come up. In fact the only mention of birth is that an addition definition for genocide is the prevention of births, however it is not a necessary action to meet the definition of the word Genocide.

              Genocide can take many forms, and CANNOT, IN ANY WAY, AT ALL, EVER, be counteracted by the rate of new births. That is not a thing and has never been a thing. Can you please provide me any literature that claims that the increase in births has any bearing on whether an action can be viewed as a Genocide?

              • NeuromancerM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Sorry I have to disagree with you. I’ll leave it as that. Since the only way to destroy a population is by deceasing the numbers. I think it’s self evident you must see a population decline.

                So we will leave it at that. You think self defense is genocide and I think it’s when you try to exterminate a population.

                • karobeccary@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That’s okay, you’re not disagreeing with me, you’re disagreeing with the literal meaning of the word. We can’t just make things up to suit how we’d like reality to be. All the best 👍

                  • NeuromancerM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    No, you just can’t understand the meaning of the word. I get it. Many people have trouble understanding the meaning of words. You seem to think self defense is genocide and while I find that odd, I get if from your view of the world. You just hate jews and think they should peacefully be exterminated. That is a stance I don’t agree with and will always defend Israels right to sell defense.