• gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well, you guys voted for fascism. Now you’ve got it.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. Argentina has had an issue with right wing, backwards ass idiots for a long time. They’re getting what they wanted

      • Coki91@dormi.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        77
        ·
        6 months ago

        Is funny to claim people are “backwards idiots” when it’s literally the first time in history this political spectrum (anarcho-capitalist) has been elected. What’s fresher than a first time ever?

          • Coki91@dormi.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            43
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            In that case would you mind explaining what they are that has already been there and has only gotten a glow up?

            I bet historians and economists would love to be enlightened

              • Coki91@dormi.zone
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                20
                ·
                6 months ago

                It appears that we have different definitions of fascism

                “A far right political ideology that is anti-democratic, ultra nationalist, and totalitarian”

                Which… yeah doesnt fit at all to his so far 7 days of government

                • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Are you really talking about the guy that denies Videla’s regime crimes? A guy that is a friend of far-right leaders around the world?

                  • Coki91@dormi.zone
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    He hasnt done such thing? During Presidential Debates he literally brought them up…

                    And someone having friends that think alike? What a crazy concept! Just like Peronism that reivindicated dictators around the world and has ties with Maduro’s Venezuela and China, even selling part of the country to them

                    Glad they didnt win.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lol, if you think this guy is anything other than your run of the mill fascist, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

          • Coki91@dormi.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ah yes, fascists. Not like those werent in power until 2 weeks ago and the opposing candidate to Milei wasnt using government power to investigate, accuse and imprison (if not kill) those who made campaign against him

            Not that has anything to do with Milei, but when you consider that… and the fact that Milei has done nothing but comply to his campaign promises you gotta wonder whos the real fascist… or even the definition

        • Fox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          6 months ago

          “The state is not going to pay for the use of the security forces; organizations that have legal status will have to pay or individuals will have to bear the cost”

          The state sending invoices to accused protesters is a about the least ancap thing I’ve ever seen. Such a fresh take.

          • barsoap
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            German police as well as courts of account have actually been lobbying to make football clubs pay for the operations they cause for quite some while. Would be tied to events with a commercial orientation attracting crowds > 5000 people or something along those lines.

          • Coki91@dormi.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            6 months ago

            Considering that the security forces will only incur when protesters take away the fundamental right of transiting the streets… which is a crime, an Invoice instead of prison is rather light

            Now is it anarcho capitalist? Well people paying for their actions and its consequences being a law sounds rather anarcho-capitalist to me

              • Coki91@dormi.zone
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                6 months ago

                The principle of no-agression and respecting the other’s freedom are literally the principles or Anarcho-capitalism

                This measures ensure that those are enforced, how is it against anarcho-capitalism?

                • barsoap
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I never signed no no-aggression treaty and as ancaps don’t consider social contracts valid I’d say I’m free to to whatever the fuck I want.

                  • Coki91@dormi.zone
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    What are you on about?

                    Are you confusing principles and ideals of an ideology for an instated regime? Or what’s your point here

          • Coki91@dormi.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            6 months ago

            In that case, could you please number the “Actions” they’ve done that deem them fascist? It’s been 7 days of government, im sure you’ll have no issue narrowing them down in such a timeframe. I would like details if you are able to provide, thanks!

              • Coki91@dormi.zone
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                6 months ago

                Thanks for the summary, unfortunately I must correct some inaccuracies on the provided bullet points

                Number 1: The threat of Jail is only for those protesters who incur on Blocking Public roads and or depriving other citizens of their right to freely transit, which has always been against the law, which makes them Criminals. The threat of Jail is only for criminals. And the claim of shooting protesters is from someone NOT in the government, in fact they are opposition so it’s not attributable to the government in any way.

                Hope this helps to make a clearer vision of what they have/are actually doing, would you please be so kind to update the list so we can see how many fascist things they are doing with that clarified?

                • Nudding@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Exactly, they should only protest out in the woods where nobody will be inconvenienced.

                  • Coki91@dormi.zone
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Not out in the woods necessarily, but it certainly wouldnt make a horrible protest place either.

                    They just have to do it like how Argentines protested against The Minister of Economy ot the Previous Government (Milei’s opponent in the presidential elections) where they manifested, called and paid by no one (unlike these “Piqueteros” the article talks about), on a Sunday and blocked no streets or pathways. Simple as that!

        • barsoap
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          There’s been a gazillion times people from that particular political spectrum, that is, neo-feudalists, have been in power.

          No actual anarchist ever has ever considered ancaps to be anything else than that, ancaps plain and simply aren’t anarchist. You cannot be an anarchist while supporting systems of rule such as, to wit, capitalism.

          • Coki91@dormi.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Ancaps arent Anarchists”

            Yes… exactly. I see you understand why they are called different things

            • barsoap
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ancaps are called Ancaps by Anarchists for that reason, yes, not because “anarcho-” wouldn’t otherwise be indicative of actual anarchism. Anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-primitivism, the list is endless. Luckily we got spared Anarcho-withoutadjectivesism.

              Either they’re trying to appropriate our good reputation, or they’re just clueless idiots. Or both. Very likely both.

              • Coki91@dormi.zone
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Or… neither?

                Words have meanings beyond the people that use them, if the meaning is appropiate for representing something, it shall be used.

                Is not like “Phobia” is on many “Phobias” just for the sake of it.

                • barsoap
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  No, words don’t have meaning to Ancaps or they would never have chosen the “anarcho-” prefix.

                  • Coki91@dormi.zone
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    What would have you chosen instead then? Something more precise would be good to know.

        • JustZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Bro half the country doesn’t know how to read wtf are you talking about they aren’t backwards idiots?

          • Coki91@dormi.zone
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Half the country doesn’t know how to read

            Half the country voted for the Minister of Economy that ran the economy to the ground, used 2 Points of the Country’s GDP for his Political campaign and was also Defacto President the past 2 Years (not democratically elected) using the Ideology that has governed Argentina for 20 Years now

            I think you just cracked the code who the “Backwards idiots” you so speak of might be

    • hh93
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 months ago

      “but he claimed to be Anarcho and anti-government”…

    • Coki91@dormi.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      6 months ago

      Good thing that the person who said what this article claims IS NOT in the government…

      • isles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        José Luis Espert, a legislator with Milei’s party

        Wikipedia continues:

        He was elected National Deputy for the Province of Buenos Aires in the 2021 Argentine legislative election.

        So what indicates he’s not in the government?

        • Coki91@dormi.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          All I can say is that Wikipedia is not a reliable source but I understand investigating profoundly every minor topic is a nuisance, but if you don’t, it all basically boils down to “trust me bro” which is what my answer is about to be:

          Jose Luis Espert is a Libertarian Legislator sure, but not on Milei’s Party, he and her companion are their own block “Avanza Libertad” while Milei’s block is “La Libertad Avanza” which Understandably might cause confusion, but the fact is that they arent the same. Meanwhile Espert’s block is affiliated with “The Pro” or “Juntos por el Cambio” who Milei’s government has made a coallition with to be enabled to govern/pass laws in the Senate. Basically an alliance

          Espert is NOWHERE in that picture however. The english article might just be outdated, tho as Milei and Espert used to be friends but they went separate ways when Espert Joined the Pro like 7 months ago. Would recommend the spanish article which is somewhat more accurate

          • isles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Thank you for taking the time to explain your points and you are correct that I’ve only really seen headlines and white media about this new leader.

            • Coki91@dormi.zone
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              In case you really are intersted, I would suggest r/Argentina on Reddit or r/Republica_Argentina again on Reddit

              To clarify the former is more right-oriented (pro current gov, against past) and the latter is Left-oriented (pro past gov, against current)

              Official new sources straight from Argentina are hard to trust, as they used to be Paid by the government and served as propagandists for it until like a week ago since Milei made a decree to halt said Payments for at least a Year (You can search about this with the term “Pauta oficial Argentina”)

              • JustZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                They’re not hard to trust they are impossible to trust. They are fantasy, fiction publications. That’s to be expected when there’s no such thing as anti corruption and half the country is illiterate.

                • aliteral@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  And yet the Argentinian middle class decides it is good to listen to corporate group news mostly. Here we have few state sponsored media channels. And if they were many, rest assured they have neither the power nor the success of Clarín and La Nación, the two biggest players in the media bussiness in the country. To be completely fair, most news media in Argentina (at least, 80% of which by far those two i mentioned previously are made of) is basically right leaning. In some cases, too much to look the other way. But Argentinians have success in defeating logic and facts with fictitious campaign slogans, complete disdain for history and ridicule understandings of economics. That is why the right wing is so strong here.

                  This new president we got surely is gonna be respecting of freedom /s

                • Coki91@dormi.zone
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I don’t know how an Anti-Corruption office would go with Media Outlets spewing misinformation, free speech is fundamental after all. If they say something that’s wrong they should be sued by the affected, people should loose interest in their channel and it would die off because there’s no profit when nobody watches or trusts them.

                  On another hand, there are some trustable ones but of course who those are varies from person to person, for now let’s just wait until the ones that cant survive without the government’s money die off and we’ll put up to public scrutiny the rest

        • Coki91@dormi.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          The security minister is in the government, yes.

          The person who said “prison or bullet” is not.