The article they cited was a press release from Jim Jordan about a letter he wrote to the FBI director Christopher Wray, so I’m not sure why they think they cited a DOJ report.
I am not ignorant on the topic. Use your words and tell me the value of the box article. From the exert you posted , it doesn’t say anything that refutes my viewpoint or what I’ve said. So why should I read liberal garbage when it’s not relevant to the topic?
Bias Rating: LEFT
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Vox often blurred the line between news and editorial
Vox’s Explainers provided only one side of an issue, making it seem as if the information provided is all readers need to know, when in reality, right-leaning individuals would likely include other facts or make different points about the topic, amounting to bias by omission
It’s liberal garbage. It was also irrelevant to the conversation.
If you notice I cite cnn often because while it’s left. It normally explores both sides.
I will take my official government document as I don’t read Vox. It is highly biased liberal garbage.
Facts and evidence? Biased liberal garbage.
But you’re not a conspiracy theorist? Lol
How does the Vox article dispute the DOJ report I cited?
It doesn’t
That’s my point. Read the article. Or at leat read what I quoted. Jesus.
Then why do I care what a lefty rag mag has to say about it? If it doesn’t refute anything I have said then who cares?
I cannot believe you are willingly this ignorant.
The article they cited was a press release from Jim Jordan about a letter he wrote to the FBI director Christopher Wray, so I’m not sure why they think they cited a DOJ report.
Read the citations In the release. The agent knew the laptop was real and still reported it as Russian disinformation.
But you called it a DOJ report.
You linked a press release from Jim Jordan that briefly mentions an attorney with the Department of Justice who sat in the interview of Laura Dehmlow.
Why are you calling it a DOJ report?
I am not ignorant on the topic. Use your words and tell me the value of the box article. From the exert you posted , it doesn’t say anything that refutes my viewpoint or what I’ve said. So why should I read liberal garbage when it’s not relevant to the topic?
Just because you don’t agree with it doesn’t mean it is inaccurate.
Vox – Bias and Credibility
Bias Rating: LEFT Factual Reporting: HIGH Country: USA Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Failed Fact Checks:
None in the Last 5 years
But ___ is left of center right, so it is [dismissive label].
This particular case the filled in answers are [vox, rag]. With users it is usually (user, troll).
Lmao why should anyone give a damn that leftist media jerks off leftist media?
If you want to show me a source of your choice that shows Vox failing a fact check I’d look into it.
It isn’t my job to educate you.
You can just say ‘I don’t have one.’
Here you go old sport.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/vox-news-media-bias
Bias by admission. As I said previously the article was irrelevant to the discussion and its liberal garbage.
Biased doesn’t mean inaccurate.
Not The Bee is very accurate as an example on the right.
Vox often blurred the line between news and editorial
Vox’s Explainers provided only one side of an issue, making it seem as if the information provided is all readers need to know, when in reality, right-leaning individuals would likely include other facts or make different points about the topic, amounting to bias by omission
It’s liberal garbage. It was also irrelevant to the conversation.
If you notice I cite cnn often because while it’s left. It normally explores both sides.