Improving teacher quality in America’s schools will take much time and hard work. You would have to start from the ground up, training new teachers from scratch based on partially lost knowledge. You would have to raise college admission standards and require four years of academic work in the teacher’s core subject.

Education degrees and teacher licensing, by the way, should be done away with. They are expensive and ineffective.

    • PizzaMan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is learning to read as an adult make someone worse off for it.

      This is such a week argument I’m not even going to bother.

      The resources wasted to force a kid to learn could be better utilized on the back end when they want to learn.

      Forcing a kid to learn isn’t a waste of resources. They will still learn.

      And kids that don’t have the willingness to learn are only a subset of kids that are struggling in school that would be left behind by private schools.

        • PizzaMan
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t force a kid to learn

          Sure you can. Pretty much every student is forced to learn.

          if you could then 19% of highschool graduates wouldn’t be functionality illeterate.

          That is not a measure of how easy it is to force kids to learn.

          Resources are limited I’d rather apply those resources to kids that are struggling then a kid that doesn’t want to learn.

          A kid that doesn’t want to learn is one of the students that are struggling.

            • PizzaMan
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s clear you know nothing about teaching or children. You can’t make a kid pay attention. They can be looking right at you and not listen to a single word you say.

              If that’s how children teach you, no wonder you think that some can’t be taught.

              If it was possible to force kids to learn all kids graduating the 12th grade would be able to read at 3rd grade level.

              That is not a measure of how easy it is to force kids to learn.

              There’s a big difference between a kid that wants to learn but has difficulties and a kid that doesn’t want to learn.

              I never said there wasn’t a difference. But both groups are kids that are struggling.

              Again if you had more experience with teaching or children you might understand this.

              This is just an ad hominem.

                • PizzaMan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re going to have to take a little more time before you post your nonsense.

                  Nah, I just don’t care to proof read for somebody who is incapable of understanding what I’m saying from the get go.

                  It is

                  No it isn’t. There’s a million reasons why education outcomes are the way they are. You can’t just point to the outcomes and say X reason and X reason alone is the cause.

                  why do you keep bringing other groups up.

                  Because both groups fall under the umbrella of kids that are struggling.

                  It’s not, you really need to brush up on your logical fallacies. I’m saying your lack of experience has made you unable to distinguish two different groups.

                  That is by definitely an ad hominem. You are attacking me instead of my position.