• psivchaz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Of these, I’d like to point out that unironically Uber is the obvious choice for Best. Hear me out…

    • Outside of the really big cities, taxi service was trash. You had to find a number and a phone, the price was almost impossible to figure out in advance, and none that I am aware of were doing anything to keep up with the times or improve anything. The competition that it hurt deserved some pain.

    • People can now paw drunkenly at their phone and generally arrive home safe. Easy access to rides has almost certainly saved lives. I don’t think you can say that about any of the others on the list.

    But wait! I’m not saying that Uber is good. I’m just saying that, theoretically, you could start a service like Uber that isn’t hot garbage, that has employees or at least better paid contractors that take home a more reasonable share of the money. Hell, a local government could create a ride hailing app that passes the entire amount back to the driver, and it would be a net benefit to society. Though at that point, maybe they should have just been looking into better public transportation and planning instead.

    • highenergyphysics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      No Uber driver ever scammed me into paying double fare or refusing credit cards.

      Uber is objectively a cancer upon society. They should legally employ their drives and pay a fair wage with prices to match.

      All I’m saying is, it takes a real shitty industry for Uber to still be the better option. Every “innovation” in the picture is a complete joke and should never be used even for practical purposes, except Uber…

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Every “innovation” in the picture…should never be used…except Uber

        It’s the holidays, there are a dozen(+) people in your family, and you want folks to fly in from out of state and have the kids play together in a living room while the adults cook together in a kitchen.

        VRBOs are sold out.

        Is Airbnb OK, if you respect the neighborhood (as best you can while still doing a short term rental)? If you rent from a family who happens to be out of town and not from a superhost with a hundred homes?

        • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Like with most things that are successful on this list, AirBNB isn’t inherently bad, and there’s no reason why you can’t hypothetically have an ethical, positive experience. But it followed the typical late-stage capitalist enshittification script, and to have that experience you have to fight through many many barriers erected by both the company and hosts to maximize profits.

          I’ve had some very nice experiences with AirBNB back when it was a startup, and when you were interacting with hosts who actually lived in the places you were staying. But at this point I’ve fully stopped using AirBNB and hotels are now a better, cheaper experience unless you find a unicorn property/host. 19 times out of 20, AirBNB is just a nightmare of hidden/high fees, abusive corporate “hosts,” and AirBNB being absolutely, reliably unwilling to help mediate or solve any problems.

        • eek2121@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Have you seen AirBnB pricing and some of the policies/fees the owners of properties have implemented? Cheaper to buy a camper.

        • Stretch2m
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you rent from a family who happens to be out of town and not from a superhost with a hundred homes?

          If there were some way to ensure this was the case, then I agree with you. As soon as you get people treating this as a business, it becomes a problem.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I say this every time this comes up, Taxis are trash, the only reason they’re decent in big cities is because that’s the only place you’ve got real competition.

      Everywhere else has a single company, at best, and a lot of the times it’s a one person LLC. Even my midsize city has a single person LLC taxi and Uber.

      Uber the company is cancer, Uber the service (Or idea/concept whatever) was exactly what was needed. No more calling dispatch and being told “It’s just around the corner” for 3 hours or them realizing I’m not local and taking me the LONG way around or even just taking fucking card lmao

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes taxi companies were trash but Uber/ride shares forced them to evolve. Big city taxi companies now have all the same features as Uber. (route and price in advance, app for requesting a ride, info about your driver, safety features, card payment, and scheduling.) I’m now back to using taxi companies. The price is actually lower on busy days as they don’t surge charge anymore. I’ve actually become a “regular” at one taxi company and they know me and I know the drivers. That’s something that would never happen using Uber. The only time I use ride share is when I wasn’t able to plan ahead. (like when my car broke down, and I needed a ride asap.)

        • Chailles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Big city taxi companies now have all the same features as Uber

          But weren’t they saying above that big city taxi companies were basically the only decent taxi companies already? Them getting better doesn’t solve what Uber is providing an alternative for.

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I honestly don’t know what qualifies as big. I guess the ones with the easiest phone number to remember or the ones with yellow in their name. I live in Denver so what counts as big here might not in NYC.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Enough people were pissed off at cabs that Uber took off. Instead of cabs looking inward to improve, they decided to act worse. I know Uber has room to improve but if that is the reaction from big cab, Cabs should be completely removed from society. Cabs were a complete fail.

      • orcrist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That depends where you are. Many cab services have improved in various cities. Of course tech is a part of this. GPS helps avoid fraud. Uber didn’t invent that, but it helped advance implementation.

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          One cab driver blackmailed my friend for money to return a phone to her she left in the back seat. One of my friends was threatened to be raped by one and busted her wrist to get away from them. I’ve been physically threatened by cab drivers who want to get sex from women they think are alone. they are protected by a union which is clearly corrupt. I been left out in the cold with a busted ankle. They wouldn’t even call an ambulance for me.

          So the last thing I want to hear is ‘depends on where you are’ cuz apathetic words are not enough to undo this damage.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Budapest banned Uber due to pressure from taxi drivers union which ended up implementing an app and matching services. It took a while to mature, but the quality of the service definitely beats that of Uber now.

      Alas, public transit is already really good in Budapest, so mostly only people that were using Taxis before Uber existed are using the services now. Except that you are less likely to get scammed on fares and be the victim of CC fraud due to the streamlined app process.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Wait before you hear of inter-city transit and a company called BlaBlaCar. While by their own claims they just organize people to give someone a ride while going to the same town, the way to really min-max it was to get a retired, nearly scrapped bus, act like multiple virtual vehicles, and then carry 10+ people without any legal safeguards for them. The’ve got some pushbacks and the service now is less tolerant to such cases, but that’s still insane. Yet, for various reasons, people take it over dying public infrastructure like official bus depots, trains, for it’s cheaper and stops when it crosses town instead of being based in a distant station on the edge of city limits. They weren’t great, but they were at least career drivers looking into each other with some minimal checks, timetables, that municipal power could regulate. And then there’s a rando (even if ex-driver) who bought an old vehicle and drives it until it either pays off or they get asleep behind the wheel on a highway leading to dozens dead.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      People can now paw drunkenly at their phone and generally arrive home safe. Easy access to rides has almost certainly saved lives. I don’t think you can say that about any of the others on the list.

      This cannot be overstated.

      A close friend of mine almost got robbed when taking a dodgy cab home. Driver did a detour to a rough part of town, told him to wait and then went into a random takeaway. When he saw the driver come out with four other guys wielding cricket bats, he bolted out of the cab and ran away.

      Uber had unquestionably made taking cabs back home in England both safer and more convenient.

    • SouthEndSunset
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Everyone will have something good to say of each of these, eg crypto doesn’t just benefit criminals.

  • GutsBerserk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Airbnb has destroyed housing market for young people trying to get out of their parents’ homes in all major Western European cities

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Interesting. I thought it was just the US and Canada where AirBnb was messing up housing for new buyers (as well as taking away options from renters).

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I think it was Britain that recently made headway on changing their housing laws to put a halt on Airbnb screwing up the economy on people who need homes. Canada are just catching up to it. in some places in Canada there are 7 empty houses to each homeless person. They are just changing the laws now. Even people who have jobs can’t afford a home. It’s so absolutely stupid airbnb went unchecked.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Same for Malaysia. Lot and lot of highrise are build for exactly this purpose. High cost, “luxury” looking design, and boasting a “mall” just below the highrise. The result is a tons of dead mall, empty apartments, empty house, and unaffordable housing.

      The government then regulate it, where they allow these place to continue to run but only on “commercial building”, which mean only on these highrise build for the purpose of short term renting. It still doesn’t solve the fundamental issue but at least we have law to combat these.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You couldn’t pay me to take a taxi again, Uber can get as expensive as they want (Eventually it’ll start to be cheaper to just rent a car for the day lmao)

      • averagedrunk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ll still take an Uber because I’m an average drunk and I don’t want to be behind the wheel (you don’t want me there either). I’ll walk 10 miles before I take a taxi though.

      • GutsBerserk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Here where I am from, we use an app called FreeNow. Works like a charm. I use taxi almost every day. For me, each € matters. Believe me, Uber is outrageous here.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Ah well the Taxi scene is a little different in the EU (At least the few countries I’ve been too), it’s been a pleasant experience, nice modern streamlined process, although I’ve never had a chance to use a EU taxi outside the big city, so it might be a similar experience in those cases as the US

          US Taxi industry is shit lmao

          • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            US Taxi industry is shit lmao

            Same everywhere as far as I can tell. Uber is a breath of fresh air. Great example of a free market thing obliterating a guild thing.

  • hglman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    So its just violations of capitalism. Perhaps the problem isn’t the tech.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t think the poster was blaming tech for the problems that resulted. The intent seemed to be to point out that these ventures weren’t so innovative as popular media would have had us believe until recently. Plenty of blame to go around for the companies’ exploitative practices, for media that just repeats what’s in the press release/ads uncritically, and for government regulators, as well.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’d rather an illegal cab company doing things right because the ‘official’ unchecked cab company is corrupt doing illegal things and people finally got fed up with it. that shouldn’t have been a thing that needed to happen to get a safe(and reliable and relevant i mean you could enter your credit card for fuck sakes that should have been updated in cabs by then) and affordable enough ride anywhere. That is a sign of a broken system when the word ‘legal’ in application lost all relativity to who it was supposed to protect in that situation. Heck, I’d drop it from all use in this case.

    • Nacktmull
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d rather an illegal cab company doing things right

      but … it´s obviously not?!

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh do you prefer the ‘legal’ cab company willfully taking you to a back alley to beat you down and feel untouchable because they are in some sort of union they feel protected by?

        • Nacktmull
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          taking you to a back alley to beat you down and feel untouchable because they are in some sort of union

          lolwut?

          • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Unions help their members legally. Apparently if a lot of members are assholes, the union still does its job.

            • Nacktmull
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I have trouble to see your point. Do you mean that makes unions a bad thing?

              • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Of course not. They’re like a tool. If they are used as a barrier against a potentially abusive employer, they’re great. If they’re used to shield cops from accountability or pay the legal fees of rapists, they’re an obstacle to justice.

                • Nacktmull
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I agree partially.

                  Yes, the function of unions is to provide a degree of protection for the working class, sure.

                  However, cop unions are a very different kind of thing than a workers union, because cops are not working class, since their job is oppression of the working class.

                  I don´t know any cases of a union paying the legal fees of a rapist and I have been under the impression that unions generally only pay legal fees for civil proceedings that are work related, which crimes like rape clearly are not covered by. Could you provide a link to such a case please?

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I see you’re lacking enough knowledge of the cab vs uber events to be throwing your hat into the ring.

    • orcrist
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      How is the illegal cab company doing things right? It’s clearly monopolistic and therefore anti-consumer.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        One cab driver blackmailed my friend for money to return a phone to her she left in the back seat. One of my friends was threatened to be raped by one and busted her wrist to get away from them. I’ve been physically threatened by cab drivers who want to get sex from women they think are alone. they are protected by a union which is clearly corrupt. I been left out in the cold with a busted ankle. They wouldn’t even call an ambulance for me.

        Haven’t run into that shitty behaviour not even once with Uber.

        Cabs are the mob.

        Up with Uber. Down with cabs.

  • kool_newt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If it works as money for crime, it’s real money.

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Plagiarism machine for sure because I don’t give a shit about intellectual property.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Accurate tho.

      Uber succeeded by burning invester money early and evading taxi regulations.

      Airbnb succeeded by burning inverter money early and evading hotel regulations.

      Crypto was originally hyped as untraceable, and that drove early buters.

      AI only works well if/because it’s trained illegally on copyright works.

      That whole “disrupter” shit was always:

      1. finding loopholes in regulations

      2. convincing rich people it will do well so they invest

      3. Spend their money while operating at a loss to gain market share

      4. Raise prices higher than original regulated service.

      Then optionally drop all your stock immediately before prices plummet and the late investors get fucked.

      • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not really accurate, just very cynical.

        All those disrupters did their job and either broke up monopolies or forced industries to adapt where they would have otherwise been perfectly content sitting on their ass and doing nothing for the consumer.

        Cabs/Taxis - artificially controlled in number to keep fares high and service sucked.

        Crypto - try to remember before crypto, the idea of cashless was non-existent. Want to make international transfers? Pay up the ass in fees and at rates they choose. Crypto forced companies to do better with digital currency.

        Generative AI - is the future and will propel innovations we have not even considered.

        Admittedly Airbnb is the only"disruptive" tech that isn’t so great and has more serious consequences, but I’m all for the hotel industry having more competition.

        We can argue the current state of Uber/Lyft and crypto isn’t great, but they started off well and did disrupt in good ways for the consumers.

        • supamanc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Crypto - try to remember before crypto, the idea of cashless was non-existent. Want to make international transfers? Pay up the ass in fees and at rates they choose. Crypto forced companies to do better with digital currency.

          That may be true in the USA, but in the UK we had cashless payment (chip and pin) well before any crypto, and sending money abroad has always been cheap and easy.

        • TimewornTraveler
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          “before Uber, we had underfunded public transit” well we still do, this is a public problem not a private one

          “before Crypto, there was no Crypto” ok granny, the rest of the world had bank transfers

          “AI is the future” no, what they’re calling AI right now is a giant scam. the tech will come, but this aint it

          • newDayRocks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            “before Uber, we had underfunded public transit” well we still do, this is a public problem not a private one

            You can classify it however you like but Uber made it better, if only for a while. No matter what you think the problem is or was it clearly wasn’t going to change on it’s own.

            “before Crypto, there was no Crypto” ok granny, the rest of the world had bank transfers

            This is something people who do not do international transfers (ignorant people) say. Bank transfers with up the ass fees and exchange rates decided by the same people. Crypto came along and rates became more competitive, showing there is demand and allowing services like Wise to come around.

            “AI is the future” no, what they’re calling AI right now is a giant scam. the tech will come, but this aint it

            Again a comment from the ignorant. You can be pedantic and call it"not real AI" but generative AI and LLM is in use now and billions are being spent too build up the infrastructure. Companies and governments aren’t doing that if the payoff isn’t there.

    • _danny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Welcome to Twitter, every idea has to be distilled into the smallest version then skewed into ragebait.