President Biden on Friday delivered a ferocious condemnation of Donald J. Trump, his likely 2024 opponent, warning in searing language that the former president had directed an insurrection and would aim to undo the nation’s bedrock democracy if he returned to power.

On the eve of the third anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol by Mr. Trump’s supporters, Mr. Biden framed the coming election as a choice between a candidate devoted to upholding America’s centuries-old ideals and a chaos agent willing to discard them for his personal benefit.

“There’s no confusion about who Trump is or what he intends to do,” Mr. Biden warned in a speech at a community college not far from Valley Forge in Pennsylvania, where George Washington commanded troops during the Revolutionary War. Exhorting supporters to prepare to vote this fall, he said: “We all know who Donald Trump is. The question is: Who are we?”

In an intensely personal address that at one point nearly led Mr. Biden to curse Mr. Trump by name, the president compared his rival to foreign autocrats who rule by fiat and lies. He said Mr. Trump had failed the basic test of American leaders, to trust the people to choose their elected officials and abide by their decisions.

“We must be clear,” Mr. Biden said. “Democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot.”

Archive

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    199
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    We need the media to start taking this shit seriously and stop “both sidsing” shit like the insurrection or the fourteenth amendment.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not sure I’ve ever heard any major media outlet say “the Trump crime family” even though that’s literally what those 5 traitors are. Not to mention the INCREDIBLE nepotism and grift of putting his kids in the WH.

        Imagine Fox News’s heads exploding if Hunter Biden (assuming no criminal past, which is generous comparing with Trump spawn) was an appointment in Biden’s government.

        • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That’s because NPR is too pussy, and all the other outlets are super far right. Overton Window is a B.

          Edit:

          I’m tempted to buy argument space in the upcoming election booklet and attack my Republican representative and drop “Trump Crime Family” repeatedly. Maybe a super sarcastic one in support and then a more serious one against.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Crime family? I thought he couldn’t speak a sentence properly? Which is it?

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      I know how we could short circuit the “both sides” arguments. Let’s reform the Democratic primary process into something actually democratic.

      • Everyone gets to vote on the same day.

      • Replace “first past the post” with any of the more functional systems for all elected offices.

      • Let a neutral organization manage debates as an open and consistent process.

      The Democratic party has total control over their primary process. Presenting themselves as the “defenders of democracy” while continuing to subvert democracy is a losing strategy, and no amount of complaining about “both sides” arguments will change that.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Everyone gets to vote on the same day.

        You realize this would give a huge boost to the “establishment” candidate, right? Primaries are staggered to give lesser known candidates a chance to build up momentum.

        Replace “first past the post”

        The primary isn’t FPTP. For example, in the 2020 NH primary both Sanders and Buttigieg won 9 delegates, and Klobuchar won 6.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sounds like removal or remote/mail in voting which is a bad idea. We do need to make voting day a federal required off day so everyone can actually go do it, making that happen wouldn’t eliminate the need for mail in votes though

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Personally I think the polls should be open for a week just to make sure everyone has a chance to go.

            Keep mail in of course for the people who can’t or don’t want to make it in.

            • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              We have to have mail in for those that live super remote and our soldiers stationed abroad.

              I agree a week of voting, nov1-7 would solve a lot of issue, make it a federal requirement that business have to provide at least one of those days off

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          What exactly do you think populism is? Are you aware that you are specifically promoting oligarchy?

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Both sides it is better for views. Which is better for sponsors. In turn keeping the debate going and keep the fire going. They have zero interest in taking any sides. It’s bad for business.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Didn’t CNN get bought out by some conservative news group fairly recently? I’d be careful about that stuff.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Out of curiosity, do you financially support any left wing news networks (that aren’t owned by a right wing organization such as AT&T) ?

  • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    “We all know who Donald Trump is. The question is: Who are we?”

    I posted the following elsewhere, just before I read that he said this, as I was thinking about a quote I heard earlier from DL Hughley regarding Trump’s election:

    “America saw exactly who it was last night… Exactly who we are,” Hughley said. “I think Obama was what we aspire to be, Trump and his supporters are who we are.”

    The Democrats’ problem is that they don’t address who we are. They offer only aspirations. Who are we (beyond the racists and fascists Trump and his supporters represent)? Broke. Sick. Overworked. Exploited. Isolated. Scared. He wants us to vote based on hope that we can push back fascism. Hope that we can win our rights back. He wants us to vote based on some dream of democracy I can’t say I’ve ever witnessed in my lifetime. Give me someone to vote for who’s going to meet us where we are.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Obama was practically the platonic ideal of the perfect neoliberal president. He said all the right words, checked all the right boxes, and effortlessly combined warmth and charm with an air of stern authority. He was, in all likelihood, the best neoliberal president we will ever get. Neoliberalism is clearly not enough.

      It’s time for the Democratic party to stop pretending they can serve the elites while paying lip service to the proles. In a rational world, the proles would have no option. Democrats are not their friends, but they will never be as bad as Republicans. But it’s not a rational world, and fascism thrives with the disaffected masses. When faced with the choice between “bad” and “worse”, “worse” is far more attractive than it should be.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s crazy to me that people actually consider it a choice.

        Take everything that you dislike about Biden and then apply it all to Trump and then add on fascism and destruction of democracy on top of it.

        There’s nothing to gain there, would Trump do any better with Israel? Hell no. We all know where he stands, in any way he can personally benefit from it at the cost of literally anyone else he will.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Disenfranchised people don’t value the current system. People in general tend to be extremely myopic. Trump was a molotov cocktail thrown at the current system. The Democrats foisting Biden on the country was a clear response of “we don’t hear you”.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s nothing to gain there

          I imagine most wager earners couldn’t care less about Israel, and it’s silly to me to pretend that that is the important issue here. Most Americans are seeing their money losing value thanks to runaway inflation, working multiple jobs. or dealing with skyrocketing energy and grocery bills. The scarcity of housing is accelerating as well.

          Yes, Trump won’t do anything to fix those issues either, but he doens’t have to. He just has to point out Biden’s shitty record and cast himself as the candidate of change, the same way he did in 2016.

          People aren’t going to care that he’s a fascist.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      “I think Obama was what we aspire to be”

      People give Obama way too much credit, but that’s how far great oratory skills will get you as president. He ruled as a conservative and was solidly in the corner of the billionaires, just like every president since Reagan.

      • Rusticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        This. Common folk haven’t had a president since Carter, and that didn’t go well. Ruling class is called that for a reason. We need more anti-corporatism (aka Boston Tea Party).

      • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        He said that on twitter, while advocating for insurrection in a live speech. If he cared that much he would’ve gone on a public speech too, but that would’ve actually been heard by the target demographic

      • EatATaco
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, seriously, one time he told everyone to remain peaceful. That totally contradicts every other time he almost explicitly called for violence! And certainly, he didn’t want it to happen, because as we all saw he swooped in immediately when they started to attacking the capitol to tell them to stop, instead of disappearing for an hour and a half.

        Stop being such an easily fooled sheep. The proof is in the pudding: his cultists who were in the capitol that day nearly universally said they were there because Trump wanted them to be there. From their own fucking mouths, and you’re still trying to maintain that Trump wasn’t instrumental in making that happen.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’ll sacrifice their lives for a person who is demonstrably the actual biggest loser in history, and he just gets more loser-y, folks, okay… If any of you are starting to have your memories fade, here’s a quick refresher to read this morning and then copy and send to your aunt karen in Missouri.

    • 0 re-elections won
    • 1 term president
    • 2 times impeached
    • 3 marriages
    • 4 inch lifts in his shoes
    • 5 kids, from 3 different mothers
    • 6 bankruptcies
    • 7 US Capitol police suing him for Jan 6 terrorist insurrection and murder of police
    • 8 trillion + dollars added to the US debt in a single term
    • 9 trump lawyers sanctioned by federal judge for lying in frivolous election fraud lawsuits and ordered to pay defendant’s legal fees
    • 10 years that trump paid $0 in income taxes between 2000 and 2015. ($0 to cops, teachers, roads, prisons, disaster relief, etc)
    • 11 trump associates charged with serious crimes over the past 5 years
    • 12 million votes (the big lie) - trump claims he won the 2020 election by 12 million votes when in reality, he lost by about 7 million votes.
    • 13 of August, 2021 - one of multiple days that trump was supposed to magically become president again according to Qanon and a crack addicted pillow salesman (the two most respected information sources in the gop)
    • 14 year old girl in a youth choir that trump approached in 1992 to say, “Wow! Just think - in a couple years I’ll be dating you.”
    • 15 originally confirmed cases of COVID in the US trump said would soon be, “down to close to zero.” followed by, “like a miracle, it will disappear.” - over 1,000,000 Americans have since died of COVID and it continues to kill 4 years later.
    • 16 years old - age of daughter ivanka when she hosted “miss teen” pageant and, according to long time trump associate Noel Casler, “trump called her over in the middle of a rehearsal and had her give him a lap dance while he leered at the crew.”
    • 17 known trump and russia investigations from local, state and federal prosecutors
    • 18 gop senators that ignored trump threats / warnings and supported Biden admin’s infrastructure bill.
    • 19 as in COVID19 - trump was verified as the single largest source of disinformation on the virus, with a Cornell study claiming that 38% of the “misinformation conversation” originated with trump
    • 20 the day in January, 2021, when Biden was sworn in despite trump inciting a violent insurrection to stop election verification at the US Capitol.
    • 21 gun salute that trump ordered for himself when he left office after a humiliating defeat, even though he never served in the military, famously called military members “losers” and “suckers” and actively avoided the draft with a cowardly “bone spurs” excuse.
    • 22 date in August, 2021, when Alabama hate rally crowd booed trump for finally saying people should get vaccinated, only after 700,000 Americans have died due mostly to his failure as president
    • 23 as in wrestlemania 23 in 2007 where trump, a cartoon level failure with no other prospects, participated in a fake bet that a proxy wrestler would win a fake fight on his behalf or he would shave his wig and hair plugs off.
    • 24 day in August, 2021, when trump actually filed a lawsuit in Florida court against YouTube, a private company, demanding that they reinstate his YouTube channel like a desperate, irrelevant embarrassment with no platforms left to abuse.
    • 25 plus credible sexual assault allegations against trump, spanning decades and with accusers starting as young as 13 years old at time of assault.
    • EatATaco
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Luckily, and despite what Trump keeps whining about, the POTUS can’t have people locked up. The courts are doing their job, as they should in a democracy. Calling for the POTUS to ignore the law, like a tyrant, in order to protect the democracy from tyranny is not a good look.

  • avater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    as a german I’m not that up to date but is it still possible that this orange, wig wearing cunt can run for presidency?

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yes, and he’s just as popular with his voters as he was in 2020, if not more, because they’re sympathetic to his claims that all the charges against him were politically motivated.
      The 14th amendment hasn’t been tested to anywhere near this extent ever, so the Supreme Court is likely to rule in his favor because there haven’t been any convictions yet and we have literally nothing to use as precident (and because he personally appointed 1/3 of the justices)

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    The “Saving Democracy” messaging is not going to reach people at all. Also, not being Trump is not good enough also. This is going to be rough if Democracy rests on the shoulders of the current leader enabling genocide.

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not being Trump is the best you’re going to get. I guess you’ll just have to choose if the guy you vote for to destroy Palestine also plans to destroy the USA.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        People should just brace for the worst outcome. Biden losing to someone saying “Day 1 Dictator” is pretty crazy but extremely possible. Trump is good at framing things being better under his run, and people care about their material needs being met.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Trump is good at framing things being better under his run, and people care about their material needs being met.

          Too bad those same people can’t see how severely they’re being lied to by Trump.

    • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I detest loudly what is happening to the Palestinians. But people like you are willing to let their own nation fall into fascism for people half a world away. Letting Trump win will absolutely not help the Palestinians, and in fact could make things worse as a Trump-led administration tells the IDF, “Hey, need any help slaughtering civilians?”

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        This nation has fallen into fascism way before Trump. This nation is built on it. Arms dealer nation full of psychopaths who enabled the lesser of two evils until they got two choices of genocide on the ballot. It isn’t harm reduction for the people who are already dead. Better put that energy into getting Biden to stop losing to a man calling himself a dictator.

        • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          So just let the world burn? Take the Black Pill and succumb to the end of the world? The end of all we know? The end of us? Coward. Raise your head and scream out against oblivion, cry out in defiance of fate. Where’s your rage, your anger? You choose to go silently into that cold dark night, I however will go down kicking and screaming.

        • Prophet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’ve been having the same thoughts. I think liberals, especially white liberals, are scared of a Trump presidency because, for once, the fallout might come down on them. They don’t have to be scared of a Biden presidency, because their lives can continue on as they have been. So then they attack you for saying that the US is already a fascist state, even though it already is for anyone who isn’t white and straight.

          • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You get it. Most of the saving of democracy comes down to being comfortability and not actual democracy or even fixing systematic issues. The saving democracy has terms and conditions anyway depending on who you are. My black experience isn’t the same as theirs. I could vote for Biden and he still would increase police funding like he did last time.

          • Anomaline@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Uhh

            Please do not invoke my rights as an excuse to let Trump take away more of my rights. What the fuck.

            • Prophet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              This comment is so shitty and condescending and completely devoid of intelligence. It reads the same as “Please do not invoke my white privilege as an excuse to let Trump take away my white privilege.” Liberals love to act like they care about issues but comments like these come off so self-centered. I don’t live in some fantasy world where a second Trump presidency is better than a second Biden presidency, but liberals are so adamant that it has to be Biden. Why aren’t liberals outraged that the DNC is forcing an unpopular candidate down our throats again? The most common response I see is “it’s complicated” but it’s not fucking complicated in the slightest, liberals just want to be comfortable and they’ll gladly roll over and take it from anyone who promises them to at least use lube. Yes I’m talking about you.

      • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lemmy doesn’t care about Ukraine anymore. Half the people on here are on some moral high horse like there is a chance that the US wouldn’t be supporting Israel if someone else was in power. Not that it’s okay I think we shouldn’t be sending shit there or supporting what they are doing at all but that’s reality of the situation.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, speak for yourself. Plenty of people care about Ukraine, there’s just no controversy there other than Putin being an asshole. But there’s no legitimate wing of American political discourse that is pro-Putin. It’s just completely obvious that he’s the bad guy and the propaganda never worked wholesale on the American population that he was a good guy. Israeli propaganda has been much more effective on creating a false dichotomy of opinion.

          • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            But there’s no legitimate wing of American political discourse that is pro-Putin.

            You must not be American because if you were you’d know the GOP is very much pro-putin and behind holding up further aid for Ukraine.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      It should be enough. But I fear that you’re right. Everyone here is pretty much on the same page, but Lemmy does not represent the average voter mentality in America.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. People will see this so-called “democracy” and wonder if it’s even worth saving. The only choices we’re given are if we want things to get worse slower or faster.

  • badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not sure we will have a 2024 election, unless supreme Court rules on status of Presidential immunity. Biden may just stay in office.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s not how it works. Even if the GOP doesn’t produce a candidate in a handful of states for no reason other than incompetence, then people will still vote and either choose the DNC candidate or use the Write In option on the ballot.

  • that guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    6 months ago

    Trump sucks but lets not pretend Biden isn’t an amalgamation of weapons contractors and ruthless capitalists pulling his puppet strings. We can do better than 100 year old presidents that won’t be here when they ruin tomorrow

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Biden was ruining things when he was younger too. He pushed the crime bill and pushed to make student loans non-dischargeable through bankruptcy. However he’s now forgiven since he pardoned a small fraction of the prisoners he helped imprison and forgave a small fraction of the student loans he helped build up. Most progressive president in modern US history!!!1

      • rckclmbr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nobody is saying Biden is great, I agree we could do better. So stop with the whataboutism. If it weren’t against Trump, there might be more tradeoffs to talk about. But right now it’s pretty much “anyone but Trump”

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Any other poorly-applied buzzwords like “whataboutism” you’d like to apply? It doesn’t stop with trump. Before trump was bush, and the message was “we gotta stop bush”. It’s not a “just this time” sort of deal. Democrats will keep promoting the shittiest candidates and then say that we must vote them in because the alternative is worse. It doesn’t end.

          • rckclmbr
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Whataboutism isn’t a buzzword, it’s a logical fallacy. Its exactly what you are saying, “what about Biden though!” while completely ignoring the point being discussed, which is that we want an alternative to trump

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              It is a buzzword because people like you misuse the hell out of it. I wasn’t even the one who brought up biden, I was responding to a post that talked about him. It’s like you’ve never had a conversation with a human before. Conversations can involve more than one laser-point-focused subject.

          • Rusticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            So you’re complaining about Biden but admit he’s the most progressive president in 50 years. Sounds about on brand for progressives.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              No one is denying that biden is the most progressive president that will democrats will allow through, so it’s not much of an admission. This isn’t the gotcha you think it is. That you’re satisfied with a bar so low that it reaches into the core of the Earth sounds about on brand for a diehard democrat such as yourself.

              • Rusticus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’m not a democrat and I’m certainly not a huge fan of Biden. But he’s not demented and he’s the best president for progressives in 50 years. Yet progressives act like there is no difference between Biden and Trump. The reason you’re not getting a reasonable progressive candidate/president is that nothing is ever good enough for progressives.

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  If you’re not a democrat, you still certainly talk like a democratic party PR bot. Asking for health care or to not be under loads of student loan debt is not too much to ask for, but apparently it is for you and the rest of the Biden cheerleaders who think we should all be happy with the garbage-ass president that the democrats pushed through as president. Progressives wanted Bernie. Bernie was the compromise and even then Biden doesn’t hold a candle to Bernie. Biden is fucking garbage, so you touting that he’s the most progressive president that the democrats will allow only makes you and the democratic party (that you supposedly aren’t a fan of) look bad.

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    https://www.democracynow.org/2012/10/17/green_partys_jill_stein_cheri_honkala

    “President Biden on Friday delivered a ferocious condemnation of Donald J. Trump, his likely 2024 opponent, warning in searing language that the former president had directed an insurrection and would aim to undo the nation’s bedrock democracy if he returned to power.”

    dude has someone chained to chair to keep her from participating in American democracy but somehow he is a defender of democratic values

    “We must be clear,” Mr. Biden said. “Democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot.”

    we lost rights with you as president and with trump and with obama such as voting rights some are not allowed to vote and some states tell you who is going to be on the ballot or not restricting choices

    jill stein said it better

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Stein

    Stein stated during the 2016 campaign that the Democratic and Republican parties are “two corporate parties” that have converged into one. Concerned by the rise of neofascism internationally and the rise of neoliberalism within the Democratic Party, she has said, “The answer to neofascism is stopping neoliberalism. Putting another Clinton in the White House will fan the flames of this right-wing extremism. We have known that for a long time, ever since Nazi Germany.”

  • citizen@normalcity.life
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot”

    Indeed, vote out these two geezers from the government

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      I share your objective, but how. The third party approach has been a complete and total failure, and the spoiler effect makes it dangerous. Pushing the Democrats left has achieved at least some minor wins. Third parties have had none.

      “But if people just voted third party…”. Great, you found a political strategy that can win, provided that the majority of voters do as their told. If we had that kind of unified engagement, any strategy would win.

      • SheeEttin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        If a third party was viable they wouldn’t be a third party they’d be one of the two

      • citizen@normalcity.life
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        Voting for a third party will push red and blue to change more than asking them kindly. As soon as a third party start to get attention red and blue even if still in power will have to go in damage mode not to lose all their voters.

        • EatATaco
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          Voting for a third party will push red and blue to change more than asking them kindly.

          Actually, it’s probably the exact opposite. They want fewer people actually involved in the election, because then they need to convince fewer people to vote for them in order to win. If you effectively remove yourself from the voting pool, by voting for someone who can’t win, you are basically making it so they don’t have to court you, not that they will.

          Even if you managed to get a third party elected, it would just revert back to two parties very rapidly. This is the nature of a FPTP voting system. This is not something you can do top down by flipping a switch. It’s gotta go the other way. Work on your local elections.

          • citizen@normalcity.life
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Go ahead and vote for a fascist or a genocide supporter and remember for the rest of your days that you voted for it

            • EatATaco
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Even if I were to agree with this and I could oversimplify it to this one thing, under the current situation my vote is only meaningful if I choose one of the two. And there is a lot more at stake than a policy difference over support for Israel.

              So how the rest of my days play out will not be affected at all by my choice to support Biden in the upcoming presidential election.

              You, however, seem blinded by anger. Your third party vote on principle will unlikely free you from this anger. Maybe it’s time to look elsewhere.

              • citizen@normalcity.life
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                So how the rest of my days play out will not be affected at all by my choice to support Biden in the upcoming presidential election.

                Sounds like you are lucky enough not to live in africa, western europe, south america or the middle east otherwise you would taste the consequences of voting for a fascist or a genocide supporter first hand under live bullets.

                Sound like you are also not really smart because you fail to realize that the moment your country stop being governed by corrupted politicians in bed with billionares and warlords, public money and the economy would spin in favor of people and not evil corporations exploiting workers and the environment for more profits.

                • EatATaco
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  because you fail to realize

                  The fact that you think you were able to infer the rest of the paragraph from what I’ve said proves that, despite how dumb I am, I’m still light years more intelligent than you.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Third parties are not a new concept. Just like the two parties, they have a track record we can look at. This has never happened. Bernie Sanders has pushed the Democrats further left than anyone since FDR, and he only started to make substantive gains when he ran as a Democrat.

          If you want to claim that third parties can achieve anything at all, it’s on you to explain what changed. The track record is abysmal.

          • citizen@normalcity.life
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            6 months ago

            Go ahead and vote for a fascist or a genocide supporter then. I’m sure this will turn out good and the two party will change its policies because someone on social media is reacting with angry emojis

            • Rusticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Agreed. You are getting downvoted by all the Russian and Chinese (and idiot Americans) that just want to foment division. Democracy is on the ballot. Just not the way most people think.

    • EatATaco
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Voting third party is not really a viable strategy until we change the FPTP voting system. You aren’t going to fix this by attempting to vote for a third party in the upcoming presidential election. If you want change in the system, you have to start from the bottom and work in local elections and then state elections to get them to change the voting system. Then we can have viable multiple parties. But this “we can vote out the POTUS in the next election!” is theoretically possible, but it’s also painfully naive in reality.

      • citizen@normalcity.life
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        is theoretically possible, but it’s also painfully naive in reality.

        In reality is just as easy as putting a vote on a third party

          • citizen@normalcity.life
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            175 million people already know that voting for a fascist or a genocide supporter is not ok, propaganda makes them believe they either have to chose one of the two

  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    “You can’t be pro-insurrectionist and pro-American.”

    The United States were literally founded on an insurrection.

    • jwt@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not sure what point you’re trying to make. Back then they couldn’t be pro-insurrectionist and pro-Britain; you can’t be pro-something you want to revolt against.