wood for sheep?

      • gimsy@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The same can be said for banknotes, they are quite useless as paper, they are mostly valuable because people see them as valuable and perceptions can change

          • aStonedSanta
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Dragon ball had it right. Fuck storing Pokémon. I wanna carry around my house

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right, which is why using gold for a currency replacement is folly. They’re both valued based on something other than their real world applications, so if you trust one to stay relevant, you should probably trust the second as well.

        • Thief_of_Crows
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Right but at least bank notes are easy to use and don’t require a scale.

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes and no.

        Gold has been used as a currency historically for many reasons. It’s inert. It has a low melting point. It’s malleable and easily divisible. It doesn’t tarnish. A piece of gold from 2,000 years ago will be the same weight today as it was then. It also is attractive, which gives it value for jewelry. And, importantly, it’s predictably rare and can be mined.

        Today, it’s also valuable for electronics. Its inability to tarnish makes it fantastic if you need a connection to be corrosion resistant.

        There’s a reason gold still holds its value even though it’s not used for currency anymore.

        • CucumberFetish
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Gold’s value isn’t tied to its usefulness. Based on statista, less than 7% of global gold use is for “technology”. The rest of it goes to jewellery, investments and banks.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The quantity you need for gold to be as useful as it’s going to be in whatever application short of aesthetic/monetary value is so low that it just doesn’t make sense for its value to be tied to its actual use. So little gold is used for “real” applications that if that was driving its valuation , it’d be probably 10% as valuable as it is. That’s what people mean when they say it isn’t useful.

      • Tremble@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m pretty sure you are wrong about that. Gold is one of the best conductors, it is extremely malleable, used in dentistry and medicine, electronics, it even protects against radiation.

        Gold is extremely useful, just an fyi you are incorrect

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If they produce mass H2 burning cells gold and platinum will rise in price drastically