I understand when people speak about the ethical problems with eating meat, but I think they do not apply to fish.

          • intensely_human
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            There is loss of fish experience I guess. Or, lack of it. There is no fishly life being lived out, after you quietly kill the fish.

            But then who are we to not spawn as many fish as possible, to maximize this good called a fish’s life?

            What if we kill the fish without pain or warning, and cause two new fish to be born. Does it pay for the killing of the fish?

            • Call me Lenny/Leni
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              It pays back to the world but not to the fish whose life we took. They will forever have to deal with unjust effects inflicted upon them.

                • Call me Lenny/Leni
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The same can be said for when anything is dead, but that doesn’t mean it’s enough to make us choose death.

                • Call me Lenny/Leni
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  The same can be said for when anything is dead, but that doesn’t mean it’s enough to make us choose death.