• MacGuffin94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    206
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t want a dumb phone. I want a circa 2014 smart phone that is not expected to replace my laptop and serve as a constant data stream for corporations. I want to be able to visit a website on my phone and not have it try to get me to download an app, be ads on 70% of the screen, or just be unreadable formatting. Let me call, text, do a basic online search, play a stupid flash game, and take my money. Stop being greedy and trying to make everything I do monetizable

    • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 months ago

      There is something about the Palm Pre or Jolla Sailfish OS that was so endearing back then. Devices that support it just don’t exist.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve already commented on other peoples comments but I’ll say it again.

      Lineage OS exists and works well with F-droid

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sadly not compatible with everything, though. My phone is off the list ☹️

        • Turbofish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          I can’t use my banking app on lineage and those wonderful folk at the bank have made it so that you cant confirm online purchases without.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well, if you can unlock the bootloader you can port it assuming the device manufacture is in compliance with the GPL.

          Might be easier to just look into a supported device when the old one breaks.

          • BluesF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah I don’t know what any of that means so I’m stuck with good ol’ daddy Samsung for now 😂

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Most people can port anything. And most of the ones who can have better uses for their time.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      With Firefox and unlock origin it’ll remove all the cruft from websites, and you can degoogle your phone, making it more private than it was in 2014 (unless you install apps that don’t respect your privacy)

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is fair phone (review) that? Its camera and battery are sub-par for the money, but it says that it makes up for it in many ways, like longevity and ability to swap out components that in other phones can mean almost getting a new one. It sounds kinda perfect for my use case but I’ve never owned one so can’t be positive. When my current phone dies, this is something I’ll heavily look into.

      • klisurovi4@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I have a Fairphone 5 and it’s… ok. It’s definitely overpriced for its specs but you can’t really expect a cheap phone while cutting down on slave labour at the same time. It’s also quite buggy. Not unusably so, but coming from a Galaxy S9 (yes, Samsung bad, that’s why I switched), it’s a bit jarring. For example, sometimes I’ll pull it out of my pocket and it’s mysteriously off. I turn it back on and there doesn’t appear to be a reason for it and it works fine. A few times I’ve had the battery drain insanely fast for some reason, despite the phone reporting no apps having high battery usage. Some apps also have issues on occasion, Discord for example tends to get stuck in the gallery view after you send a picture and it doesn’t allow you to open the keyboard again. It’s also missing some minor, but neat things, like the ability to snooze alarms by turning over the phone (Edit: tbh that’s probably a stock Android thing and not really fair to hold against the phone, but I still miss it) and the fingerprint reader is nowhere near as reliable as the one in my old phone.

        The vast majority of the time it works just fine and if you don’t expect the polish you’ll get out of a Samsung flagship, you’ll probably be ok with it. But you are very much paying a premium for the sustainability and repairability, not the overall experience. I don’t regret supporting Fairphone, vote with your wallet and all that, but I definitely recognise the device itself has issues and when looked at purely on specs and software quality, it isn’t really worth the money.

        • mynachmadarch@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          I can’t comment on fairphone, but the Discord thing is likely not your phone, it’s Discord or something. The same happens to me randomly on a Pixel 6a.

        • ElectricMachman@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          As a fellow FP5 user, I haven’t come across the issues you’ve mentioned - that said, I did install /e/os pretty much immediately, so perhaps that’s why.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Thank you so much for sharing your experiences - that should definitely help people!:-)

          I wonder if they perhaps have some QA issues, so you got a lemon, or maybe the design itself is just that bad. You wouldn’t necessarily know, I’m just musing out loud!:-P

          One thing I do want to ask if you don’t mind - b/c I don’t know how to interpret the specs and I no longer trust paid reviewers - is how smooth does it handle? Like, noticeable lags or no? If it is basically a cheapie smartphone for a sub-flagship price, I might even be okay with that but wanted to know before getting into it.

          • klisurovi4@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Keep in mind that my basis for comparison is a Galaxy S9. The Fairphone feels smoother and more responsive most of the time, but you do occasionally get freezes and lag spikes, mostly when you try to minimise an app that is currently loading something from my experience. Particularly heavy websites also slow it down sometimes, but pretty rarely.

            And I wouldn’t really call the design “that bad”, I was listing off my issues with it, so it might have come across that way, but the majority of the time it works completely fine.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              So on a scale of 1-5, responsiveness might be a 4?

              About the design, I mean like a poorly-placed power button that is easily triggered (and then whatever confirmation procedure is in place can be performed by your pocket), or the sudden drainage of battery issue could be something about poor Quality Assurance when they pick batteries at the factory to put into the devices prior to shipping them out. Or worse, you could replace the battery and that effect could still happen!?

              I had a Nexus 5 that would dial things, like even emergency #s (fortunately I don’t think it would actually do the call, just dial the numbers) while in my pocket - it may have had something to do with turning the screen on while a headphone jack was plugged into it. I replaced the OS for other reasons and that happened to solve that issue as well:-). So I would not turn a phone away for such a thing, especially if there is a software/configuration fix.

              But responsiveness is as much due to hardware as software - e.g. if Firefox runs slow b/c it was compiled for and websites (even mobile) designed for higher-end specs.

              • klisurovi4@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Yeah, I’d say 4 is about right. And the power button is a bit recessed (it doubles as the fingerprint reader), so it’s really hard to press it accidentally. I genuinely have no idea how it could randomly turn off in my pocket. As for the battery, I’m pretty confident it’s a software issue. It’s only happened twice in the 4 months I’ve owned the phone and a restart fixed it both times.

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Thanks for the additional feedback!:-) That does greatly reassure me.

                  Since you said the phone would come right back on immediately thereafter, it sounds to me like it does not seem connected to the battery issue.

                  Unless the battery issue wasn’t “really” a discharge but the sensor somehow being tricked into thinking that the battery was dying - in which case the phone likely shut down gracefully rather than risk a brown-out situation, but then when you powered it up later it realizes once again that it has battery.

                  But in a more normal scenario, if you have either tap-to-wake or if hitting the power button results in a screen prompt confirmation that does not require a fingerprint or PIN, and especially if you were walking or cycling or some such, then the screen likely rubbed up against your pocket lining and managed to cause the proper combination of actions to shut it off. It could not start up an app that way - that would need your login - but turning a device off usually requires lesser security.

                  Fortunately the latter may be possible to fix with a configuration setting or other software fix:-).

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Personally I’m very happy with my fairphone. Knowing I can replace parts when they break is nice. And idgaf about camera as long as it can take a halfway decent picture, so a phone that skimps on camera for less cost is a win in my book

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          That is literally the top feature I am looking for: skimp heavily rather than go all out on the camera, so basically the exact opposite of a Pixel. Whatever amount I pay for a phone - $100-$500 - I want the camera to be perhaps 20% of the price, not well over half as tends to be the case these days. OnePlus especially the “flagship killers” used to be the most similar to that (or at least you didn’t pay the Premium for Pixel while getting significantly lesser specs), but after their cofounder left when they enshittified I simply don’t trust the company to ever purchase anything from them again.

    • fpslem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      2014 phones also fit in my hand. I miss that size, you can’t even find them now.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Dumb phones don’t help you for tickets, boarding passes, tap to pay, etc. those things require strong security, not the latest tech. I’ve got a few teenage kids and even for them it’s not very practical to exist without a smartphone.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want to be able to pull up an 80% version of a website on my phone, and have a button to open the full website on my computer for when I get home.

    • 0xED
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This sounds good, but I’m still not downloading Tapatalk…

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    People want phones that don’t cost $1000+, lack basic features and constantly prey on their personal data. That’s what they want. Some express that by saying they want “dumb phones”, but the first part is the larger driver here.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      A big part of the markup is simply the proprietary systems that run the phone. Apple’s restrictive OS, combined with the planned obsolescence strategy for older units, corral their customer base into buying newer models every 3-5 years.

      Android’s open system allows for competitor brands to compete alongside the bigger publishers - Samsung and Sony and Lenova and Motorola. But even then, we’ve lost the more modular phone design to a hobbyist-hostile manufacturing strategy that precludes people from swapping out old batteries or doing basic repairs.

      This, combined with data providers that try to bake the price of new phones into the subscription service (AT&T, Verizon, and Tmobile all offering “free” phone upgrades on painfully expensive plans) make the industry this extractive rent-seeking mess.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want those things and I want a phone that’s easy to use, doesn’t constantly advertise to me, and is more of a helpful tool than a distraction.

      • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think that last bit is more of a ‘what you make of it’ situation, regardless of how smart or dumb a phone is.

        Unfortunately the manufacturers want the data and advertising revenue, and they’d only be persuaded to offer an alternative if they made the same amount of money.

        If each sale of a $900 smart phone gives them $100 of ad revenue over a couple years, I’d bet my bottom dollar they would charge $200 for the ‘dumb’ version.

        • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think the distractions are partially a user issue and partially a company issue. Companies make their programs noisy with notifications by default that I only change it once I’ve found it annoying. They also make their program so bloated that they are slow to load and execute. By the time the app loads, I’ve lost my flow and now the tool is a nuisance. My mind is already cluttered. I don’t need tech to slow it down.

          • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I see what you mean. People use their devices at different levels. That may not be the best way to put it.

            My meaning is that a portion of the users will be the type to spend a couple hours digging through each setting on a new device to set it to their needs. Another group will use the device with minimal initial adjustments, and tweak things as they find things they don’t like. Then there’s a third group that will almost never open a preferences panel and just use a device by its factory settings, likely to never consider potential improvements to their user experience.

            From what you’ve said, I imagine your in that second group. I myself am in the first one I described; I look at the options of any hardware I purchase or software I download before I actually begin to use it.

            Unfortunately - in the context of this post - the number of people in that third group I imagine outnumber us by multiple orders of magnitude, and therefore companies with shareholders to appease will always manufacture devices with as much bloat and advertising and invasive data mining as they can be paid to put in.

  • 520@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Uh, they DO still make dumb phones. And people still buy them.

  • simple
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Step 1: Reformat your Android phone

    Step 2: Turn on ultra power saving mode (this disables everything in the system except a few apps such as phone and messaging)

    Step 3: Never connect to the internet

    Et voila. You have a dumb phone.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t think people really want dumbphones, I think they just want apps that better support their self-control. Digital Wellbeing on Android is a start, but it’s way too easy to bypass.

    • eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wager some people want “dumbphones”. A phone you open and just dial into without scrolling through apps. A phone with a simple screen that doesn’t just gobble down battery life. So, like, a smartphone could fit this need with the right interfaces available.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, yeah, but that’s a different desire than this article is talking about because they’re more or less talking about flip phones.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want people to stop thinking that their little quip to me is of the utmost importance. I want people to wait a few hours to tell me something instead of calling me while I’m driving and act insulted when I tell them to hurry up because I’m either driving or pulled over.

      • ji17br@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you don’t like being disturbed while driving you should use do not disturb while driving.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ew, people call you? All my friends text, because they know we are busy adults, I’ll get to the chat when I can get to the chat. Little monster stays on vibration only or complete silence until I decide so. I control the damn thing not the other way around. Everybody who knows me or I give my phone number knows that phone call means someone died, there’s blood everywhere, or the building got set on fire. Nothing else requires phone call level urgency.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Phone calls are for urgency and very often I do need to respond quickly. I also expect and am disappointed when people don’t answer calls from me because I only call for urgent matters.

          Even if my father knew how to send text messages, his fat, dry fingers can’t use the on screen keyboard.

    • danciestlobster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can just never connect your TV to the Internet or make it forget all networks, that works pretty well if you have a console or PC hooked into it that is doing the actual content for it

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        You still have to deal with the piece of shit taking forever to turn on, and the possibility of it simply dying because any component of the “smart” part died.

      • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        At some point smart TV manufacturers are going to catch on and require Internet, it’s only a matter of time

    • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I looked at this when replacing my TV. If you want a nice panel the options are pretty limited, or you have to pay for commercial sets or a projector. I settled on creating separate VLAN for my smarttv and limiting what apps are installed on it and sourcing a blocklist for all its tracking shit.

  • mister_flibble
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not as far as “dumb” per se but I would accept “less smart” in exchange for physical buttons and a removable battery.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 months ago

    Dumb phones don’t have all the gooey “track everything we do” goodness in the middle so I doubt it.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Exactly. If dumbphones made a comeback, companies would simply achieve it by presenting the user with a dumb UI while the data harvesting would still go on in the background.

        I guess there’s the valid argument that you’d be doing less on your phone so there’d be less to spy on, but there’d still be spying, and much of it would simply be shifted to the user’s PC instead of a smartphone. Guess what, spying is rife there too.

        The answer to stopping the spying is privacy laws that put people, and their privacy, above tax-dodging multinationals.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want a real software dev team for linux phones. I don’t have programming knowledge, but I can pitch in for a reoccurring crowdfund to pay them. The Pinephone is nice hardware, but Pine64 has always said that they’re leaving the software up to the community.

  • gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    Dumbphone maybe not. But a Linux phone that is fully functional and eschews the corporate app eco system? Yes please

    I admit I would miss tap to pay tho

  • PugEnjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mostly just want a phone that doesn’t want to sell me on new ways to use my phone that I don’t already do. I don’t want a phone that’s constantly trying to get me to use voice search, or try out some AI feature, or a search engine, etc. I have a newer Samsung tablet, and by default holding the power button turned on voice search instead of the power off menu? I fucking hate that shit, it was thankfully changeable but it was annoying that I had to change it back. I literally never use voice search. I fucking hate talking to computers, I’m not talking to a machine unless it’s actually capable of feeling offended if I don’t

  • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t want a dumb phone but I would 100% take a phone with a back that isn’t glass, high repairability, and full control over the OS. Make it THICC and put a big battery too.

      • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because if you want wireless charging it’s that or plastic and the latter certainly doesn’t make for a great premium product

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I use my phones with a case, so I actually don’t know the difference

          • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I van assure you at the very least the part where the coil is situated has no metal backplate. While technically possible to charge wirelessly with a metal back the efficiency of the charging would drop into hell. Unless absolutely not otherwise doable it’s better avoided, not least of all because the back would heat up immensenly when using charging speeds that are remotely useful

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        From what I understand about phone design, it allows for the smallest possible design that can still do NFC and wireless charging, while keeping that premium feel.

        I don’t give a damn about premium feel, I just want a no-nonsense phone that does what it’s fucking supposed to while still being serviceable.

    • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Legit the cheapo plastic screens on the less than $100 phones are the most resilient phones i’ve ever owned

      I had a chunk of metal fall on one, and the only thing it did was INDENT the screen, the plastic was soft enough to bend rather than just crack

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      So a fairphone? Though it doesn’t provide wireless charging I think.

        • Decq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah that was probably the wrong decision, following their mantra. But personally it doesn’t bother me too much. I’m pretty happy with it

          • far_university1990@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago
            1. Make repairable phone

            2. Remove headphone jack and release wireless bud that not repairable (TWS earbud)

            3. Piss off community

            4. ???

            5. Profit?

            (i know fairbud now better, but was not back then)

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      For now there are Fairphone and SHIFTphone but both only guarantee to work in the EU. They offer very mid hardware but I hear they do actually work.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not EU so I’ll have to wait. It cost me around $40 USD in shipping and taxes just to import a damn Pinecil to Canada, my country is ridiculous.

        • The_Cunt_of_Monte_Cristo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wanna to hear worse? In Turkey you can not import a phone with shipping. You have to bring it with yourself and register it with your passport after paying around 1000 dollars.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’m not 100% sure on this but there is always the possibility your carrier could always block devices it does not recognize. I need to look more into this.

          Also, it seems that someone has already started to work on bringing mobile Linux “PostMarketOS” to the new Shiftphone. It’s not even released yet. If it’s officially supported, I’ll have a favorite brand for sure. That kind of software support would be unprecedented (except maybe the Librem as mentioned earlier but their hardware repeatability is much lower).

      • tux7350@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        The name is silly but the Galaxy XCover 6 pro checks all those boxes as a new phone. It even has the old style notification light, different colors for notifications.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    People want these to avoid watching ads and being a guinea pig for their own money.

    If something like Maemo was a thing today, would be different.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      So maybe they could just…not use apps that bombard them with ads? How hard is that?

  • guacupado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    People don’t want dumb phones. They’re already available and no one buys them.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yup.

      In the 2000s (very young at the time) I sometimes thought about how awesome it would be if we had devices where we could go on the Internet from everywhere.

      I do not want the world back where people could only look things up on the Internet from home or work or where there is a desktop computer.