The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.
So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.
Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.
You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.
More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care, I’ll answer yours. I dont have some nonsense gotcha that I’m clutching to.
Replace care with relevant.
Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
Better?
Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.
So why do you care enough to comment here at all?
As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.
When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.
You claimed I stated there were good white supremists. Below is your lie.
You claim there are good white supremacists.
You’ve claimed I was gaslightning you and then in your very next reply claimed you never stated I was making things up. One of those is a lie.
Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant
I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.
If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.
Just keep making up lies, it’s all you got. We both know there was nothing incorrect about my original statement.
deleted by creator
Not a surprise you have nothing meaningful to say.
What from my original statement do you disagree with?
deleted by creator
I’ll take that as you don’t dispute anything in my original statement.
Once again you are asking for proof of something I never claimed to be true because you can’t find fault with my original statement.
deleted by creator
I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.
So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.
Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
deleted by creator
You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.
Replace care with relevant.
Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
Better?
Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.
As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.
I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.
If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.