Maybe even enough to win :D
You must log in or register to comment.
I remember voting for Sanders a couple different times
Biden did quite a bit for the working class, although quite a lot more would be fuckin fantastic. But I do get your point. I feel like maybe you are confusing “get to vote for” with “get to have on a silver platter without needing to play on the tilted table that is US politics and actually get the dude or dudette elected”. I don’t think there has ever been a country where the ruling class will let go of power and give the people a fair shake just because they stand up and say “better candidates pls I don’t like these ones.”
In other words what’s your alternative, just give up and wait for things to get worse until we all starve or go to the camps?
I read it as “waaahhhh politics is hard and/or I don’t know how it works”
Run your candidate, get the votes. N’est-ce pas?
Nothing’s preventing that. If it’s the first time out, maybe a Presidential run isn’t the best idea.
Run your candidate, get the votes. N’est-ce pas?
Out of curiosity, how would you respond to people voting third party instead of for Harris?
In the past day you’ve attacked people for trying to push for Harris to have more left-leaning policies. So you don’t actually want people to do the work to get involved in politics, you want people to just vote for whoever the Democrats run.
Out of curiosity, how would you respond to people voting third party instead of for Harris?
I would simply remind them that third-parties will not win electoral votes, and as this election will be razor-close anyway, a third party vote is a vote for trump.
In the past day you’ve attacked people for trying to push for Harris to have more left-leaning policies. So you don’t actually want people to do the work to get involved in politics, you want people to just vote for whoever the Democrats run.
No. Two things: Firstly, undermining support for a campaign can be done by posing as pushing for more progressive policies. We saw this a lot with “gEnOSiDE jOe = i won’t vote for genocide”. Two - involvement in politics is always a positive thing. But with 87 days til the election, it’s kind of the only time demanding changes from outside the party is super unlikely.
If we survive this election and Harris gets in, I’ll be right there demanding progress. For the next 87 days though, it’s more GOTV than Here’s My List of Demands.
This entire response is an exercise in mental gymnastics. Leftists are bad for “not doing politics” but also leftists are bad for doing politics.
If we survive this election and Harris gets in, I’ll be right there demanding progress. For the next 87 days though, it’s more GOTV than Here’s My List of Demands.
If I had a penny for every liberal that said that and then didn’t actually care, I’d be able to pay the student debt Joe Biden thought I didn’t deserve to have forgiven.
This entire response is an exercise in mental gymnastics. Leftists are bad for “not doing politics” but also leftists are bad for doing politics.
“Controlled burns are good for forests, but unattended raging wildfires are bad? Mental gymnastics!”
Shockingly, the same action has different results in different contexts. Knowing when to take which action for the maximum benefit, and minimum damage, to a cause isn’t mental gymnastics, it’s just regular thinking.
If I had a penny for every leftist who understood politics I’d have about $37.50
This entire response is an exercise in mental gymnastics. Leftists are bad for “not doing politics” but also leftists are bad for doing politics.
I don’t know how you mean, but I’m assuming you’re conflating “doing politics” with negative comments about Harris’ perceived lack of woo woo magickal socialistic legislation?
Leftists are bad for limiting the chance to defeat trump - that’s it. That’s my fundamental “leftists are bad for doing” complaint. If leftists want to organize voting, circulate petitions, attend meetings and give opinions, run candidates for local elections or any of the actual boring AF things that actually comprise the core of political effort - I am 100% supportive of them doing that. The chances would be very good that I’d support those efforts or candidates.
But I don’t ever see a lot of evidence that they’ve done that. All I ever see is pointless complaints like “waah liebruls are preventing magickal goodnesses” concentrated around the presidential election cycle - and that’s it. So, yeah, that’s worse than useless, that’s just counterproductive.
It’s not a coincidence that’s what russian influence groups like IRA did in 2016 , 2020, and now. Because creating divisions only helps The Cult. Couldn’t they just go to the trump supporters and do that there? Complain how trump isn’t progressive enough, cause FUD over there and try to bring down their voter base? At least then there’d be a benefit to it.
Facebook sold political ads to fake accounts linked to Russia
Most of the ads didn’t specifically mention the election or express support for a particular candidate. But they did appear to “focus on amplifying divisive social and political messages across the ideological spectrum – touching on topics from LGBT matters to race issues to immigration to gun rights,”
You see how “focusing on amplifying divisive social and political messages” in the run up to an election is a russian influence tactic? That’s why I say right now is the wrong time for “doing politics” on an internet forum. Register voters, knock on doors or text people if you need to do so, but posting “Harris isn’t progressive enough on —-“ right now is not okay. There are three years and seven months to do that. And I guarantee everyone whining about ‘the liberals’ won’t say anything (or, more accurately, do anything) in that time. Why is that, I wonder.
but posting “Harris isn’t progressive enough on —-“ right now is not okay
Trans people are literally just asking for basic human dignity, and you’re telling us that isn’t okay.
Sorry - how do you mean? Is Harris promoting some horrible thing?
Isn’t Walz one of the most working class guys who’s been on the ticket for awhile?
Still think we should say, “Harris.”
Yeah but I think we learned our mistakes from Obama. Yes, get excited and vote. Then follow it up with leverage.
In the primary. And if your candidate gets enough votes there, then in the election. But first in the primary. If you don’t get past the primary, then your candidate didn’t get enough votes. That’s how democracy works.
And I’ll be the first to say that First Past the Post is a garbage system that could and should be replaced with any of about a half a dozen better ones, but first you’ve got to actually win a regular election and get someone in who might actually pass something like Ranked Choice, or get a ballot measure with enough votes.
Oh, and also try running for something like city council first and, you know, eventually work your way up to Congress or the Presidency, once you’ve established that you’re actually serious about governing, and not just out there running vanity campaigns or playing spoiler.
You don’t get to vote for somebody who represents the working class because the political establishment cannot represent the working class.
It really is that simple.
