Even if her views didn’t align to mine, the fact that she does not go around espousing it at every turn (just like her faith), is still reason enough to respect the hell out of her. So she could be secretly batshit crazier than Vance, and I’d still respect her.
I mean, if she is secretly a trump supporter I’m pretty sure her reason to keep it a secret would be entirely selfish so I couldn’t agree there. Better than if she shared that view sure but I don’t see it being altruistic. I refuse to think she is a trumper though because if she is, then nothing can be pure in this world.
Nothing and nobody is perfect, we live in a broken imperfect world and sanity is a myth made up by averages. Demanding she be anything so you can think of her as perfect ignores nuance and her as a person.
No one will ever agree with you on everything but if their actions are good and align with yours then that should be enough.
No I’m calling you out for trying to force your own desires of perfection on someone else. That your sense of morality is black and white and not helpful to anyone.
I didn’t miss it, I didn’t like it.
Says the person who went to find another of my comments to send a unrelated personal attack based on nothing other than your feelings cause you demand that everyone falls in line with you and agrees on all stances.
In literally not a conservative but it’s easier for you to just assume that because I disagree with you and you can button everyone into groups. That’s exactly the thing I think you are wrong for doing.
I don’t know why I’m getting pushback to a hypothetical that I’ve clearly stated I don’t want to be true and I don’t believe is true. The only reason I even have this as a possible idea is that she keeps her views secret, so it’s not on me either way. It is natural to sometimes be curious about people’s motives even if you think they’re probably a great person.
My theory as someone from Appalachia is that she’s a left leaning centrist trying to bring class consciousness back to the coal mining areas (y’know, where they shot their bosses in literal battles to establish worker unions previously), but she also depends on those local economies to get resources to do this and has to play both sides.
She’s made it her life’s mission to improve the education and literacy rate of the region and has to appear homey and down to earth to the folks living in the south as she doesn’t want to compromise her image. She says things in a vague enough way to not be accused of being a dirty lefty commie (their words, not mine).
I don’t think you deserve pushback, just offering an alternative explanation.
Yup. She wants to help her people and the most effective way of doing it is by educating the kids.
Giving books to children is a super effective way to spend the money. They can educate themselves out of the hole.
It’s actually really subversive. Smart lady. She plays the game quite well. She can’t take an open liberal stance as she would be marginalized, but educating children is difficult to attack.
I have no doubt that she’s a closeted liberal in the south. It’s often how you have to be to survive.
I could easily imagine her as either conservative or liberal or somewhere in between or somewhere outside of that whole spectrum. I can’t imagine that she is a Trumper.
I expect that her reason for not sharing her political beliefs is at least somewhat selfish. She has fans across the political spectrum, different segments of whom would certainly be upset by any political position she espoused. It could even be that she’s concerned about fans being angry and violent depending on what her views actually are.
Regardless, the fact that she doesn’t use her popularity to influence politics makes me respect her all the more. I my opinion, it’s both a smart decision for her, personally, and shows moral character.
Even if her views didn’t align to mine, the fact that she does not go around espousing it at every turn (just like her faith), is still reason enough to respect the hell out of her. So she could be secretly batshit crazier than Vance, and I’d still respect her.
I mean, if she is secretly a trump supporter I’m pretty sure her reason to keep it a secret would be entirely selfish so I couldn’t agree there. Better than if she shared that view sure but I don’t see it being altruistic. I refuse to think she is a trumper though because if she is, then nothing can be pure in this world.
Nothing and nobody is perfect, we live in a broken imperfect world and sanity is a myth made up by averages. Demanding she be anything so you can think of her as perfect ignores nuance and her as a person.
No one will ever agree with you on everything but if their actions are good and align with yours then that should be enough.
Seems you entirely missed my point
No I’m calling you out for trying to force your own desires of perfection on someone else. That your sense of morality is black and white and not helpful to anyone.
I didn’t miss it, I didn’t like it.
Way to prove you understood nothing, but confidently believe the opposite.
Also way to admit you’re a trump supporter. Since if you weren’t it’d probably be really easy to get the point
Says the person who went to find another of my comments to send a unrelated personal attack based on nothing other than your feelings cause you demand that everyone falls in line with you and agrees on all stances.
Get lost.
Removed by mod
In literally not a conservative but it’s easier for you to just assume that because I disagree with you and you can button everyone into groups. That’s exactly the thing I think you are wrong for doing.
If she’s actively trying to help educate people, she’s no secret Trump supporter.
I don’t know why I’m getting pushback to a hypothetical that I’ve clearly stated I don’t want to be true and I don’t believe is true. The only reason I even have this as a possible idea is that she keeps her views secret, so it’s not on me either way. It is natural to sometimes be curious about people’s motives even if you think they’re probably a great person.
My theory as someone from Appalachia is that she’s a left leaning centrist trying to bring class consciousness back to the coal mining areas (y’know, where they shot their bosses in literal battles to establish worker unions previously), but she also depends on those local economies to get resources to do this and has to play both sides.
She’s made it her life’s mission to improve the education and literacy rate of the region and has to appear homey and down to earth to the folks living in the south as she doesn’t want to compromise her image. She says things in a vague enough way to not be accused of being a dirty lefty commie (their words, not mine).
I don’t think you deserve pushback, just offering an alternative explanation.
Yup. She wants to help her people and the most effective way of doing it is by educating the kids.
Giving books to children is a super effective way to spend the money. They can educate themselves out of the hole.
It’s actually really subversive. Smart lady. She plays the game quite well. She can’t take an open liberal stance as she would be marginalized, but educating children is difficult to attack.
I have no doubt that she’s a closeted liberal in the south. It’s often how you have to be to survive.
I could easily imagine her as either conservative or liberal or somewhere in between or somewhere outside of that whole spectrum. I can’t imagine that she is a Trumper.
I expect that her reason for not sharing her political beliefs is at least somewhat selfish. She has fans across the political spectrum, different segments of whom would certainly be upset by any political position she espoused. It could even be that she’s concerned about fans being angry and violent depending on what her views actually are.
Regardless, the fact that she doesn’t use her popularity to influence politics makes me respect her all the more. I my opinion, it’s both a smart decision for her, personally, and shows moral character.