• comador @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    FFS. How about just deny the purchase of single family homes by all businesses altogether?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Passing tax law is firmly in Congress’ remit. Telling corporations what they can and cannot buy is a whole lot stickier. The former is far easier.

      • orcrist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Right. And tax fraud is a crime, so then could be massively fined or locked up for it.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Sounds perfect, do it. I wanna see your income statement when you own 20 apartments.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Not only would it make sense for each of the shell people to have the income on their own tax statements when running that sort of subsidizing loan operation, but its actually got fiscal incentive to be done that way because it puts them in lower brackets.

          Plus, given the number of foreign owners invested in US properties, it would be difficult or possibly even impossible to charge and expedite them for tax evasion given the tightly constrained budget of the IRS and therefor their inability to go after people without a gaurantee they can earn more back than they spend on the court proceedings.

        • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Don’t remember what the business was but there have been cases of businesses using individuals names on paperwork, saying they own the business, but that person has zero responsibility and gets no pay for it. Probably it was on an episode of Last Week Tonight.

    • thefartographer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can’t deny the purchase of a single family home from a person and businesses are people in this upside down country

        • thefartographer
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Just because California’s cool doesn’t mean the entire country gets to benefit. And until Citizens United at least gets weekend, then we’ve got fucking corporations with an equal or stronger voice than humans dying on the streets from heat stroke

          ETA: I was obviously really tired and not thinking when I wrote this. I’d edit it, but I like to own up to my mistakes. Have a great weakened, everyone!

          • comador @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I didn’t downvote you for your response, but also didn’t feel the need to explain it further.

            To add to it however, a proposed bill in Minnesota’s Senate would ban the conversion of single-family ownership housing into rental housing.

            In the US Congress, legislation has also been introduced to prohibit hedge funds from owning single-family homes.

            Progress is slow, but it’s happening.

            • thefartographer
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              You’re making very valid points and I appreciate your optimism. I’m just being a sarcastic, salty little baby about shit cuz I’m in a mood about all this.