• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    >Visit a park for free

    > Realize that you’re theoretically owing everyone in town roughly $0.01 for your “free” stay

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      10 months ago

      They make their money by investing mine. In return, they provide me a safe place for my cash and financial services. Fair deal. I’m OK with that.

      Having said that, fuck banks for private individuals. Go credit union, all the way. And while we’re at it, call your bank and tell them you don’t want overdraft protection. They have to turn off the NSF fees, and that’s not my opinion and it’s not negotiable. It’s law in the US.

          • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Wait, as a bank? I’m suprised your uni has one as I expected them to be quite hard to run. Wouldn’t you need to employ a couple of good economists to invest the money, keep a part liquid, etc. for you?

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’ve seen a handful of "university of [place name] credit union"s I imagine it’s a case of “we already do some financial products, might as well cut out the middle man and make it a branch of the business”

              I also worked at a regional bank with about 20 locations. Out of the 120 or so employees most were tellers and branch managers, then only about a dozen were behind the desk people doing literally everything else keeping the lights on, so in terms of headcount it doesn’t take that many people to run a small bank. Hardest part is raising the capital to get a bank charter (I think that’s like 10 million dollars for a single location last I looked)

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’ve lived in several places and at least two of them (including the one I have now) had a credit union as a university thing that only people affiliated with a university can use. I have one now because my wife used to work at the university, so we qualified for them then and you get to keep them even if you no longer are affiliated.

              I wish you got to keep your right to pay for a membership to the university sports complex. Seriously, if you were an employee or student, you could pay $15 a month to use the track and pool and weight room and stuff. But if you weren’t attached to the university, there is no amount you could pay to use it. They also made employees pay for parking. My wife has worked for two universities. Both of them made her pay for a university parking sticker. But, again, if she or I wanted one now, we couldn’t get one. What the fuck.

    • PatMustard@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Bank accounts, you mean the one place most people specifically do get interest, the opposite of what this post is pointing out?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Savings accounts get interest. Paychecks usually don’t get deposited in them and people don’t have enough left over to save much anyway.

        • SeducingCamel
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s like 0.5% but my credit union has interest on checking lol

        • PatMustard@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wow, you really shouldn’t have your money in any accounts that aren’t giving above-inflation interest

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 months ago

    As an accountant I’ve listened to several colleagues talk for hours about dialing in their W-2’s, some even under withholding and making quarterly payments to make up the difference. Calculating exactly what they are saving and investing that into a seperate account.

    Probably spending more in fees than they’re saving. Let alone the time invested. I’m perfectly fine with the government slowly accumulating 1% of my income extra over the course of a year and sending it back later personally.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      It doesn’t have to be that hard for normal paycheck people. Just set the deductions so you owe money trial by error style. As long as you get enough of a raise each year you won’t owe a penalty.

      • DrPop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is kinda what I do, I work out of state so I have been tweaking to get my state refund for one match the balance for the other because I’m too broke otherwise.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fellow accountant here.

      I’m getting $500 back this year. Sometimes I owe that much and offset with additional HSA contributions.

      I don’t sweat it much beyond that. Just make sure I’m safe harbored and reconcile in February.

      Unless we’re talking tens of thousands of dollars variance, the “free government loan” is entirely immaterial for most people, especially when savings accounts were paying a fraction of one percent interest and investments would either ring up ridiculous fees or require lot purchases far beyond the excess withholding.

      I’m drinking beer this afternoon and don’t know if there’s a point to what I just said.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m drinking beer this afternoon and don’t know if there’s a point to what I just said.

        Yes. There is a point to saying you’re drinking beer this afternoon. The point is that you’re having a nice afternoon!

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    My employer sells “stocks” to employees that don’t show anywhere and you can only sell them back to the company after two year. Exchange also isn’t immediate. Company chooses the date.

    They really want people to buy those things and are heavily campaigning for it.

    They also give a small amount of these stocks as bonuses to people that have performed well.

    When I say to people that buying those “stocks” just gives the company free loan, they look at me weird.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, stock is basically a loan to the company. Sure, if a company always new it was going to grow at a certain rate and life were guaranteed they could give everyone an exact raise…

      Instead they say “here is a bonus, its built on a gamble. Here’s is monopoly money that might be worth 10% more in two years, or maybe the company will be bankrupt and you will be unemployed.”

      Would it be better to get a cash bonus or a raise of similar value? Sure.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    While this might be correct, I disagree with this as a philosophy.

    A) most people in this country don’t have cash reserves to pay an underpaid tax bill.

    B) most people don’t have the investment acumen to properly invest monies not withheld on taxes to benefit from not paying as much on their income.

    C) They just spend the money because most Americans live paycheck to paycheck, and because A and B.

    So for most people I would say that judicious overpayment of tax on the W4 resulting in a minor or modest tax refund is probably better all-around. That money will go right back into the economy or pay off some debt.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      It kind of feels like a year-long savings account. Once a year, we have enough money to do something like pay for new gutters.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s cool. However I think some people take this philosophy seriously and set themselves up for a problem. Figured my 2¢ wouldn’t hurt.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It also shields you from human error, the IRS already knows what your taxable income is (assuming your employer correctly withholds it for you). Its much less stress to file with an error in your favor than in theirs. If you own them they will hunt you to the ends of the earth and make you resolve it, but if they owe you they just send you a check and call it a day.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    Reminds me of one of the ‘warnings’ they gave us in basic training - tldr is that the folks in finance are just as dumb as the rest of us, and invariably there are a couple recruits in every batch that have their first paycheck MAJORLY fucked up.

    Like, instead of the $400 we’re supposed to get, we’d get like $40,000 cuz of some fat-finger fuckup in Excel.

    The warning was “DO NOT TOUCH a single cent of money you’re not supposed to have, cuz they WILL notice and you WILL have to pay it back!”

    …which in my mind translated to: “If you win the finance fuckery lottery, all your loans just became 0% interest!!”

    I was not one of the lucky ones. Q_Q

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t know how that works with the feds, but I worked IT for a private payroll firm. If we fucked up and put extra money in your account, that was your money. We had no means of taking it back. None.

      Imagine the possible scams if it wasn’t that way!

      Caveat: If the bank fucks up and deposits too much, while that’s on them, you don’t get to keep the funds.

      I’ll note: American employees, while not having the protections we should have, probably get more than you think. If you start work for us and I send you a $3,500 MacBook, and you quit next week? LOL, keep it. HR can’t hold your last check or any other such thing.

      • Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        Was the benefactor of finance mistake in military. It’s not your money, it’s the government’s. They take it back. You have no defense and no rights.

        Bonus is if they screw up and give you $25k extra like they did me, you can pay it back as 10% of your base income, interest free. Turned out to be a 0% interest 3 year car loan for me!

  • ramble81
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So I’d make a few bucks in interest off it. I’d rather give it to them for a nice little payday around March and to not have the stress of trying to hit close to zero without owing.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yep! You’re making pennies on bank interest. Dial in your W4 tight if you wish, but the feds aren’t getting much over on ya.

      • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        With my current bank, my return would have gotten me nearly $100 in interest over the last year.

        • zaphod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yup. Folks seems to be oblivious to the fact that increased interest rates mean savings accounts are pretty decent these days if you shop around. I’m getting 4.5% in a high interest savings account which would’ve unthinkable a few years ago.

  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    You could have just estimated your income taxes ahead of time and saved enough to pay it before the due date, but why risk jailtime when there is automatic tax withholding available to you?

    It’s worse when you’re operating a business and you have to pay quarterly estimated taxes.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Eh, you generally don’t get jail time for late payment. Tax agencies are more interested in getting the money than putting people in jail and people don’t make money to pay off what they owe when they’re in jail.

      You get charged interest for late payment, but it’s at a very reasonable rate. The government can borrow money at better interest rate than is available to most people after all.

      The big no-no is lying on your tax forms. That’s something they might put you in jail for. But even then they’re likely to prefer fines over jail time. Because they want that money.

      People that go to jail are either Al Capone who the government just wants to get for anything, or people that continuously try to defraud the government on their tax forms. Sometimes it’s people who straight up refuse to pay their taxes, but even then they’ll try to garnish their wages to get the money. But if that mechanism isn’t available, then that can result in jail time.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Surely the list of countries/governments that don’t ever even bother to give their citizens a tax return is much longer than the ones that do.

    • sholomo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      here in Mexico there’s an app and website from Hacienda (Treasury) they calculate your tax return automatically. I tried it 2 years ago and they’re still working on “returning” my taxes

    • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What percentage of those are ones with competent tax-funded programs that actually provide value to their citizens? Cause in the US I don’t see shit

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This assumes tax return is because of over-withholding. If you’re like me with a young family and low-ish income you pay $0 in federal taxes and get a bunch back for EIC, child tax credits, etc. I’m just excited because I’ll be able to fully pay off some of the debts that have been hanging over me and largely not shrinking at all next month

    • YAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m gonna be straight. In reality I’m absolutely fine with taxes. It’s just funny to think about it as in the meme.

  • JPJones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Doesn’t matter. You’d have spent it on bullshit, anyways, but now you have a nice chunk to blow all at once!

    • taanegl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This. Every year I tax some percent above what’s necessary, and clap with glee when I get some extra income.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      See facts like this make me wonder if a Norway style sovereign wealth fund could be developed to close the gaps in people’s quality of life and what they’ve put into working.

      It’s not like the US is short on natural resource wealth to invest as the principle, and put together with a restructured tax regime it could significantly reduce the net burden for most americans, and especially the most misfortuned americans.