• Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s wild that if multiple things we implemented republicans would never win the presidency again.

    Any anti voter suppression method, like universal mail in voting

    Ranked choice voting

    Removal of the electoral college

    I am sure there are even more.

    Remember that republicans are the minority, they just show up to vote more often (and aren’t actively suppressed)

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’d still win the Presidency occasionally. They’d just have to do it by adopting policies that more voters would support.

      You know - what they’re supposed to be doing.

    • Moobythegoldensock
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      They would still win, but they would have to shift their platform to capture the true political center rather than the center right.

    • skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The electrical collage is way overdue to be retired. I wonder if we will have the means to actually do it.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The way elections are run Is mostly up to the states. The electoral college, though, is stipulated in the Constitution.

          • orcrist
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s not exactly true. Each state could choose to give their votes to the candidate that wins the national vote. Then the electoral college system would still exist on paper but in reality wouldn’t be relevant to the outcome.

            I think it would be better to amend the Constitution. But it’s not the only way to make popular vote reality.

            • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The states changing their electors outside their popular vote is exactly what Trump was trying to do.

              • orcrist
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                That sounds scary, but you gotta be precise. Trump was trying to do that after the fact, which would be a coup d’etat. In reality, many states have reasonably made changes over time before elections. Did you know that two states aren’t winner-take-all, and that this has changed over time? Wild!

                  • orcrist
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I was hoping for more from you. You wrote something that sounded scary but was actually misleading. You could have corrected yourself, because there’s value to what you were trying to communicate. Facts are important, my friend.

              • Crikeste
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                And they’re gearing up for version 2.0. Shit’s gonna get weird in a few months.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Or we could ratio it out of existence. If we had 10,000 representatives then the EC would match the popular vote results.

    • Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Unpopular Fanatics vs Apathetic Majority. Conservatives refuse to change their unpopular policies and with all the crap they pull to make elections favor them, they struggle to get 50/50. If elections were made fair and representative of the population…they would never win. The only way to win in that environment is to have the more popular policies, and that is antithetical to conservativisim.

    • HiddenLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Actually, it would be better for Republicans to try to convince the population their solutions are better instead of the BS we have now. It might help the Republican Party become somewhat normal again and then get more votes. I would love it if we could have real debates on real issues, instead of the BS we have now. I might even be a tad conservative in some areas… But right now, the choice is between Dems or Crazy Town. I think a popular vote would change politics and strategy so that you couldn’t have a Trump anymore.