The only naive mistake on any players’ part would be playing with this guy in the first place
Pinging @UlyssesT@hexbear.net because I know you hate this stuff too
For a palate cleanser, here’s what Rich Burlew (author of Order of the Stick) has to say on the subject:
I was expecting this to be shit. Pleasantly surprised
Rich can be an abrasive dick at times, but he’s always been vocally opposed to the “genocide good” section of TTRPG players (and has gone on record saying that alignment shouldn’t be listed in racial stat blocks).
Alignment is kinda dated. I’m glad people are moving on from it. My game I’m in now we basically ignore it.
Pathfinder 2e has gotten rid of alignment entirely as a tangible concept
Everything is based around edicts (things a character, culture or organization approve of and strive towards) and anathema (things that piss off said characters, cultures and organizations)
It’s another good move forward
I’m aware. I just haven’t had time to run a PF2e game.
Alignment is for Outsiders in my group.
Yes, that demon is literally a concept of Evil given physical form. No, that orc is not, stop being racist.
a concept of Evil given physical form
“Is it sexy?”
depends on the degree that Christian protestant sexual morality had influence on the design (more Protestantism = more sexually charged conceptions of evil)
Yeah that’s the only real reason to use it imho
I actually really like this use for alignment, as the thembo that has been laughed away from several online games because I like the concept of Drow trying to leave the surface world in a better state for the next one to escape the Underdark. The slow death of racial alignments has been so fucking vindicating.
I remember playing DnD with my bf’s parents and family friend, all old school players, and they were all baffled that I wanted to play as a kindly full orc druid. The dm was so unprepared for me to try and talk to the bugbears we encountered that they genuinely didn’t have any story planned for them.
a kindly full orc druid
I imagine this has a lot of the same potential intersections that my tiefling druid concept had and I adore this concept if you were really gonna lean into how prejudiced most druidic groves tend to be presented where goblinoid and orc-adjacent races are concerned; and how this prejudice isn’t borne of Silvanus at all-- but man, if a DM admitted to me that they had nothing for an action a non-murderhobo would take, maybe it’s just my being used to Fallout-style DM’ing; I think I’d lose a degree of respect for their pen. Like fuck, at least improv something.
Yes, that demon is literally a concept of Evil given physical form
Even then, in my worlds I still occasionally like to include the edge cases of outsiders rejecting the evil of their archfiends (or overlords, what have you) and, if not redeeming themselves, sometimes being a little bit more chill (sometimes still morally dubious but in a more fun way).
I think my tendency towards a historical materialist lens has really affected my worldbuilding lol. I always like to logic out how outsider societies would work in my settings given such concepts as soul-corruption, damnation, souls as currency, immortality, and on and on. I find it much more interesting that way.
Yeah a fiend society and most fiends are “evil” in a similar way to any of the truly evil empires in our world and their supporting people are - with the added fun factors that a large percent of the population may literally be harvesting damned souls, or be born from the greed/hate/lust/jealousy of former mortal souls. I like a demon not having to be 110% inevitably bound by their origin
I remember someone talking about how they had changed spells like “Detect good & evil” to instead detect wether they’ve got qualities that are considered “good” in the culture of the caster.
Like if your culture values bravery or strength or guile or whatever and the being you cast it on exhibits those values, then it’s “good”
It really feels like older DnD players can either be super chill, or super fucked up.
Guess which of the two Gary Gygax was
As far as i know, Dead.
To my knowledge fucked up.
“If my players aren’t genocidal freaks like me, my thinly veiled racist caricatures will try to convince them”
Smh, fake D&D fans getting their morality from Goblin Slayer. Real D&D Racists get their morality from Gary “I am Adolf Hitler” Gygax.
CW: 19th century racism
I saw some DND guy say that the way WOTC is handling the game is making Gygax spin in his grave, which as much as I’d hate to praise WOTC, they are doing a very good thing by making him spin in his grave.
Smh, Hasbro is disrespecting the guy who saw fit to include a Random Harlot Table in the AD&D DMG. Has Big Woke gone too far!?
tag yourself I’m the expensive doxy
saucy tart
Slovenly trull here.
Random Harlot Table
That straight-up sounds like something you’d see in FATAL
You’re underselling it. Fantasy Adventure To Adult Lechery aka F.A.T.A.L. has [Sex Worker] as a playable class! They gain
XPAP for getting people off.No, really.
i pirated a copy of that game as part of a big package years ago. flipped through it out of curiosity because i had always heard the rumors
and it was just so fucking lame. i say this as a very sex positive person. just absolute incel levels of sexuality.
wouldn’t surprise me if it was cobbled together as a group effort on 4chan.
i’ve seen far better fan made hornystuff modules for D20 (and even they are just too much)
wouldn’t surprise me if it was cobbled together as a group effort on 4chan.
FATAL actually predates 4chan (released in 2002, 4chan was founded in 2003).
hmm then maybe some fucked up usenet group
just absolute incel levels of sexuality.
I think implying incels (let alone FATAL) have some higher degree of sexuality is incorrect, it’s just emotionally constipated sexuality
They are only really trying to get rid of the baggage for profit reasons (and pressure from within the company), but it is definitely not a bad thing to alienate chuds from table top games.
DnD was conceived broken and has (mostly) been improved over time cmv.
I’m so glad I play DND with queer theater kids
best DM i ever had was one of those.
I dont understand any appeal to make a race “inherently evil” like if you want something players can kill without remorse just add bandits or asshole knights.
Racism. Racism is the appeal.
The catch is that if you’re ruthless towards goblins, their natural enemy (kobolds) will spiral out of control and turn the entire world into a murderhole
anti kobold propaganda. w- they would never would do such a thing
FREE KURTULMAK! DOWN WITH GLITTERGOLD AND THE GNOME OPPRESSORS!
A good DM won’t let you massacre the demon children. A great DM will ensure you don’t forget about the moral implications of killing demon children. I remember my party thought the best tactic to stop a fascist invasion would be scorched earth tactics on a critical town. However, they scorched the earth with people in it and ended up massacring the townspeople. I tried to have an arc about trying to atone for that and dealing with the fallout but I wasn’t quite good enough to pull it off.
Mfer talks about a show that could have come out of Goebbels’ ass or be some greasy racist 1980 porn movie like it’s a source of inspiration for his next play at the duke’s court
Your innately evil force in your game that exisrts for people to have something to stab shouldn’t create circumstances wherein the players have the opportunity to commit crimes against humanity.
if you paint goblins as an ontologically evil force then yes, but if it’s just some goblin babies and they’re fighting goblins as part of a normal conflict and they decide to kill the babies as a first option, than either the players need to examine their RPG brainworms or leave the group
I have been kicking around a campaign idea where the BBEG is an evil wizard that has sucked all the evil out of the world to use for himself, so anything evil is instantly vaporized. Of course, the Wizard is evil and controlling, but it also upsets the natural order, so he must be stopped. Goblins are aligned neutral evil (As they often are) but along the way, the adventurers find a village of goblins who have learned to be good, but are under constant temptation do to bad things. So as the adventurers walk around the town, if they don’t stop a goblin from biting them or pick pocketing them, POOF, goblin gone.
Of course this leads to a meditation on good and evil, and what that really means. Also all of the goblins are named after military contractors.
It’s be funnier if the goblins being good was disturbing the natural order of the universe so the adventurers have to turn them back to evil to save the world from disharmony.
Villains by Necessity has a story with that premise. Not-Gandalf walls off the elemental force of evil, but too much goodness is now running the risk of making the universe go poof.
It helps the reading that the ‘evil’ characters are largely just edgelords, with the good guys being pretentious.
“we have to commit war crimes because someone else will need to and will do worse stuff” is a really fucked up and Hitlery premise if that’s the thesis of it
Same energy.
i’d be concerned if my DM’s worldbuilding was driven by hentai like that
you know besides the genocide apologia
deleted by creator
I mean they’re monsters. They’re not originally intended to be people, they’re meant to be like the troll from Three Billy Goats Gruff or the witch from Hansel and Gretel or the dragon from the paper bag princess. You know, antagonists.
If the logic of a work of fiction leads to a situation where total systemic extermination of a sapient race including the babies is justified, then that work of fiction is at best creepy and gross.
race
The use of this word in DnD is extremely sus and always has been. If you want something to be fundamentally different from humans, that’s a different species. I’ve always found the DnD “races” as social stand-ins for IRL races suspect because uhh black people are human beings
I’ve always used “species” or “people”. Pathfinder using “ancestry” for species and “heritage” for the subspecies/ethnicity is cool too.
I always found it weird when I’d get online comments about how using “species” is supposedly too scifi and I honestly don’t get it.
That’s not even getting into the extremely tired rhetoric of “if you think the orcs/goblins/kobolds/etc are stand-ins for black/indigenous/etc people I think that makes you the real racist huh”
“if you think the orcs/goblins/kobolds/etc are stand-ins for black/indigenous/etc people I think that makes you the real racist huh”
This is true but in a different way. I side-eye at using things that are definitely physiologically and anatomically different from human beings as a stand in for marginalized humans.
That too - same reason why racism allegories like
don’t work so well. When you try to write a story as 1:1 parallel to real life using species with vast inherent physical disparities, things tend to get messy.That’s not to say you can’t draw upon the history of racism, colonialism, etc., for your scifi or fantasy ofc, but it requires a little more effort and consideration than that to make a compelling story
yeh but murdering babies of a race of “”“monsters”“” that can talk because theyre evil has real world implications in how people view others, see every liberal calling russian’s “orcs”, and especially with israel and its ongoing genocide of the palestianians, where they frequently call palestianian children and civilians vermin that need to be wiped out before they become a problem
fiction is a mirror for reality, when a writer writes something like this, it indicates their biases in the real world. When a writer writes in a demi human race who you need to kill the babies of, thats because the writer wants that race to exist
here’s the thing though, remember that part of the story where hansel and gretel brutally murdered the witch’s baby
whoever introduced that (the DM) chose to humanize the monsters. if they expect you to kill the babies nonetheless, then they are fucked up.
