• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    In total, there were 118 false positives — a rate of 4.29%.

    Earlier this year, investors filed a class-action lawsuit, accusing company executives of overstating the devices’ capabilities and claiming that “Evolv does not reliably detect knives or guns.”

    I mean, in terms of performance, I’d be more concerned about the false positive rate than the false negative rate, given the context. Like, if you miss a gun, whatever. That’s at worst just the status quo, which has been working. Some money gets wasted on the machine. But if you are incorrectly stopping more than 1 in 25 New Yorkers from getting on their train, and apply that to all subway riders, that sounds like a monumental mess.

    • jettrscga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      With how trigger happy police are, the false positives would lead to more deaths than they prevent. And police would claim it’s justified because the machine told them so.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I saw a dude jogging up the stairs and his gun fell out of his hoody sweats. He looked at it for a second and the picked it up and put it on his hoody like it was his phone.

    5/7 best subway exit ever.

  • narc0tic_bird
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The article links an article from March '24 talking about the introduction of these devices that contains this part:

    The scanner that Adams and police officials introduced during Thursday’s news conference in a lower Manhattan station came from Evolv, a publicly traded company that has been accused of doctoring the results of software testing to make its scanners appear more effective than they are.

    So they could never be trusted but were still allowed to proceed.

  • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Someone should tell NYC that it is unconstitutional to infringe upon a person’s right to bear arms.

    • Milk_Sheikh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Earlier this year, investors filed a class-action lawsuit, accusing company executives of overstating the devices’ capabilities and claiming that “Evolv does not reliably detect knives or guns.”

      It’s fraud. The company knows it’s unreliable and the investors know it’s unreliable, I wonder why NYC is still going to expand the trial run? 🤔

      [Mayor] Adams has touted the Massachusetts-based company since taking office in 2022.

          • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Not if there is a federal agent. It is legal here in NM but the feds are constantly seizing pot because it is not legal at a federal level.

            • BossDj
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              That is up to the state’s attorney general whether to go after drug offense or not

            • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 hours ago

              It’s gonna be fun when it’s legal in all 50 states at the state level, but still illegal federally.

              Wait, did I say fun? I meant bullshit. It’s going to be bullshit.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Trump DGAF and Kamala made a career outta jailing weed smokers so it’s not likely to change anytime soon.

                • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  https://news.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-said-she-long-200919997.html

                  “I just think we have come to a point where we have to understand that we need to legalize it and stop criminalizing this behavior,” she said. “Actually, this is not a new position for me. I have felt for a long time we need to legalize it, so that’s where I am on that.”

                  As San Francisco district attorney from 2004 to 2011, Harris oversaw over 1,900 convictions for cannabis violations, the San Jose Mercury News reported in 2019. Still, only a small number of those people ended up in prison.

                  https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/analysis-tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris/

                  Harris “put over fifteen hundred people in jail for marijuana violations”

                  As attorney general, Kamala Harris would not have personally prosecuted drug cases. Local district attorneys would generally prosecute such cases so to say Harris “put … people in jail” as state attorney general is not accurate.

            • fuckingkangaroos
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I don’t think federal agents are using these scanners to find people carrying weed

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      No, no. We just need to keep using it! It just needs a bigger sample. Surely, we’ll find a weapon, eventually!

      /s