• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The dog was only 6-yo, not like they were whipping along some old man.

    Ever been around dogs? They love doing what they’re trained for. Had he been forcibly retired, he would have been devastated.

    The caps are almost certainly way cheaper than purchasing a new dog. Last I heard, trained Germans Shepherds were going for $10,000, and that was 30-years ago.

    https://fox17.com/news/local/taking-a-bite-out-of-crime-sullivan-county-k-9-gets-titanium-teeth-caps-to-extend-service-life-cherry-point-animal-hospital-andy-cherry-k9-deke-sullivan-county-sheriffs-office-sgt-hunter-ford

  • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Just today I was listening to Peter F. Hamilton’s “Exodus: The Archimedes Engine” and the mention of attack dogs with diamond-tipped teeth sounded a little wacky for sci-fi. Sometimes life can be stranger than fiction.

  • _lilith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It can’t be normal to wear out k9 teeth. I know they file them so they punch instead of tear but this seems dumb. What is he biting bricks?

  • kippinitreal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Devils advocate: retiring an old service dog means you’d need to invest in training another pup which is way more expensive than titanium teeth and dealing even with animal cruelty complaints and/or lawsuits. Also “bleed blue” fanboys will see this as badass, so its free PR.

    As a mortal/moral person advocate: WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU.

    • orcrist
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Devil’s advocate counter: You think the pigs give one hoot about the cost? Of course they don’t.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              25 minutes ago

              I don’t know who gave them to me. I just found both pairs in places that it made no sense for them to be.

              One was just sitting in the middle of Natural Bridge, in Natural Bridge State Park, Kentucky. The second pair just showed up on the hood of my still running car while I was on delivery. The universe does strange things like that.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Is it proper to hold the dog’s snout like a bowling ball to show its teeth?

    • Hugh_Jeggs
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A dog’s nose is 1000 times more sensitive than a human’s

      It’s animal cruelty so it works!

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s 1000 times more sensitive to scent. I’m no veterinarian, nor am I a dog, but I foster dogs, and those little fuckers aren’t exactly gentle about shoving their snouts into anything and everything available. I doubt it would hurt the dog.

        That being said, yeah, the dog doesn’t like it, and would probably bite anyone other than their human that tried to do that.

    • lud
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      To be fair, animals have been used that way for many millennia. It’s just recently we decided that some animals are pets and not tools.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        To be even more fair, that is exactly the terminology used for military personnel medical procedures. We all know that the thugs with badges absolutely love to cosplay as military, so it follows that they would use military terminology.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        Military members are considered “equipment,” by the US military. The terminology originated with them. The thugs with badges are using it for their cosplay.

        • meowMix2525
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          I don’t think that’s okay for military purposes either tbh. Actually it’s pretty disgusting.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            I can understand that when taken at face value. The reason for it is that as a member of the military, you are extremely technically no longer a citizen of the US, nor are you governed by the laws and regulations of the US. You are now governed by the UCMJ, which, in theory, is much stricter about what codes of conduct will be allowed in your day to day life.

            Mostly it’s for accounting purposes.

    • pyrflie
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      They’re Cops. “Better blue than you” per every municipality ever.