• L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Lifespans are certainly longer considering McCoy is still up and walking around near the start of TNG. 😒 Keiko being Keiko once again…

    • mosiacmango
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Keiko being Keiko once again…

      A sharp edged but reasonable person? A flat out “good takes” machine that doesn’t know the main characters are Mary sues immune from real consequences?

  • BakerBagel@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    The actual answer is that thr next generation being referred to is the generation watching the show. Their parents grew up watching the original, and now they are watching Star Trek for their generation.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m pretty sure it was just the next generation/iteration of the show. They played around with Kirk and Spock at the academy and Captain Sulu and probably some other ideas. I think Greenfield like they did was the correct path.

  • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    A “generation” is colloquially ~14-20 years, and “several” means 7+. Keiko’s high as balls again. 🤦🏽‍♂️

    edit: if “several” generations “by any reckoning” were able to fit into ~85 years’ time, it would require 10yr olds becoming parents in each generation, consecutively. What the actual, Keiko. Words matter. Ew.

        • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree with the poster below, in that they’re ambiguous terms used interchangably, descriptive linguistics and whatnot. But in my brain, they’re hard coded as couple=2, few=3, several=4+, a bunch= 10 or more, but not 12. Can me 10, 11, 13+, but can’t specifically be 12. That’s a dozen.

          • criitz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I agree with these, except I would use a bunch to mean as low as say, 5 or 6. Like a bunch of bananas at a grocer.

            • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I could get behind this. The low end of a bunch isn’t as clearly defined in my head as the others. So long as it isn’t precisely 12, it’s okay. Lol. Also, 6 is often “half dozen” but not always.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Haha, sorry! I know people like to give very specific meanings to words like a few, several, or some, but colloquially to me they are intentionally ambiguous and all basically mean “a small amount, more than 2”

      • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        TBF, even three “generations” in that span assumes parenthood by 28 (2021: 30, FYI), and 4+ generations by 7 years apiece — putting it well beyond reality “by any reckoning”.

      • Rusty@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Heroes of might and magic III taught me when I was a kid that Few means 1-4 and several means 5-9 and I refuse to receive any other explanations

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Generations and the boundaries for how they are defined is a social construct, regular intervals by years? Distinct by some major event or phenomenon? Perhaps it had been one generation by TNG norms

    • Sertou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There were 3 generations of starships named Enterprise between TOS and TNG. Surely that’s the most relevant measure of a generation for Star Trek.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe I missed something, but how can it be 85 years apart since Scotty was on TNG.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      In that episode, they find Scotty trapped in a transporter buffer.

      But they also had a super old Dr. McCoy in one of the first episodes, so maybe lifespans are longer too.