• Cataphract@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I just don’t get why we’re not training and endorsing out the next group with all this press. Sanders and Warren need to back and/or start a coalition of progressive up-and-coming leaders that they can help hone and introduce to the larger political landscape while they have the energy and influence. They need to stop being the only torch bearers and start bringing in underlings. Idc if they follow them around like a posse, might actually be better if they did. I would cuddle with Sanders all night if I could, I’m just tired of his name being the only one catching attention. The will try to bury any movement with him when his time comes, best to get ahead of it so momentum can keep going.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s kind of scary to think that this man could literally die any day and there’ll be nobody to take his place.

  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Warren can go fuck herself, She was one of several that backed out of the 2020 race to kneecap Bernie Because he was projected to win the Democrat nomination. People like Warren fucked all of us.

    • BigBenis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      FWIW she actually didn’t back out with the moderate candidates before Super Tuesday. She did after splitting the progressive vote between her and Bernie, giving Biden the win.

  • x3x3
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Do people still feel the bern?

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Thats more of a step 2 or 3. Step 1 is that everybody needs to start putting pressure on the DNC and make sure they understand that we’re not going to take it anymore. And I’m not referring to that bullshit “not voting” rhetoric, because not voting is tantamount to voting republican.

      Once the DNC is forced to listen to us plebs again, then it’ll be a good time to look at breaking out into more parties. But we need to put the fear of whomever they pray to in them first.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You know you can do more than pressure them, right? You can get involved with your state party, which in turn elects the leaders of the national party. You can vote in the primaries and kick out corporate Dems. We know this works because it’s precisely how the fascists took over the Republican party.

      • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The dnc is never going to listen to the plebs because they only answer the money, and we don’t have it. As long as people keep participating in their game of electoral politics, nothing will change. Let them lose several elections in a row, and maybe they’ll see the light or fade off into obscurity, which is the preferred method.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Doubt we have two or three elections left in us.

          Look, I’m right there with you and this defeatist feeling. You and me by ourselves can’t do shit. But guess what? There’s millions of us. And for decades it’s been beaten into our heads that we are powerless; that we are nothing because we are not rich.

          There was a time where there was a group of people who were treated far worse than we’re being treated now. They had so much less than us, and got treated so much worse than us. Yet somehow, they fought back. And while they’re still fighting, they’ve made huge inroads with the status quo that it’s left its mark for the rest of time.

          If they can do that, then the least we can do is scare the shit out of a bunch of idjits at the DNC.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The reality of American political process is that it takes at least a billion dollars to run a Presidential campaign. (Thanks, SCOTUS) That kind of money doesn’t come from unions, social activists, or proletariat donors. It comes from corporations and billionaires, and those people don’t like revolution.

        Until someone can demonstrate that you can get more votes with progressive, worker-friendly policy proposals than with a well funded propaganda machine, the DNC is going to keep chasing the less conservative billionaires. And no third party will even be relevant.

          • niucllos
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I mean we very obviously do. We have two corporate oligarch parties, but I would much rather have the tech billionaire club that brought us the Gates foundation or the Allen institute and isn’t actively trying to kill a large portion of the country than the one that sees what Israel is doing to Palestine as a good model of how to clean up the riffraff

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I mean we very obviously do.

              No. We have a viable party that chases billionaires with credibility behind it, and the Democratic Party that chases billionaires while pretending that they are for working people, and kills their own viability because they have no credibility with either group.

              As long as they chase billionaires, Democrats are not a viable second party. From a functional standpoint, we have only one party.

              • niucllos
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Does viable have a different definition for you that doesn’t include winning roughly half of elections?

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The thing is, a message that’s simple, resonates, and allows people to blame others will always win out over a message calling people to pull their own weight and do the complicated but correct things.

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If they really cared about “country over party” they’d vehemently support ranked choice voting at all levels of government and an end to gerrymandering. Even though the Democrats aren’t really extremists our political system will continue to prop up extreme views if everything is identity politics and there are only two you can choose from.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yup. Call your Senators and tell them you have no faith in the party leadership, and that Chuck Shcumer cannot continue as Senate Minority Leader. If they’re up for reelection in the next two years, tell them you’re happy to support a primary challenger if it’s the only way to get change.

      • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Step 1 is already done, and now institutional resistance from inside the party is the problem. So it is in fact time for step 2, there’s enough of a body of voters to start building it.

        The trick is that to subsume the DNC in the next ten years or so, the party has to form a coalition with it for now while remaining separate. That could achieve two goals: first, put a lot of pressure on Republicans they aren’t ready for. Next, create a strong leftward tension that just isn’t represented right now and which the Democrats will be walled off from controlling.

        It’s sort of what happened with the Tea Party / MAGA.

  • HuntressHimbo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Good on Warren for saying this. I think that the attacks on Warren for staying in the 2020 primary were really overboard. She would have been a great candidate 🥲

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Warren, along with the other candidates, colluded with the DNC to drop out en masse in favor of Biden. She, unlike Bernie, is a DNC card-carrying member who, despite her positive work and Progressive stance on Wall Street, played along with the machinations of the Democratic party. They ignored the will of the people.

      If she had endorsed Sanders instead of accusing him of lying (second link), we might have had a different outcome. Moreover, Hillary implied he was sexist - a laughable accusation.

      Warren lacked the convictions she needed when the time was right.

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Holy shit, you just mind blasted me with a memory I had lost. That whole shit show between Bernie and Warren during a debate where she acted all fluffed and pissed off because Bernie was apparently somekind of sexist?! or at least the media and her team tried to play it that way but it completely backfired if I remember right.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Sanders could have won every single vote cast for Warren and he’d still have lost the primary. Stop making up conspiracies and start recognizing that we need more people to vote for us.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            They just scream “conspiracy theorist” at everyone to their left because they can no longer pretend that we all want Trump to win. Wondered what was gonna replace “trumper!” as the go-to admission that they’re not listening and are out of touch on purpose.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            15 hours ago

            “Here’s how Bernie could still win”

            He’s not the one with the copium addiction bro.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            15 hours ago

            None of your links refuted anything about how Warren’s endorsement would have changed anything, which is my statement. They didn’t even support your conspiracies, they just referenced events that non-believers and true believers don’t have any disagreement over. Just posting any old link is not “receipts”. Receipts actually support your statements.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Funny how you’re getting downvoted, but this post saying the same thing isn’t.

      Do better, Lemmy. Quit dogpiling; this isn’t Reddit.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        If you make the exact same low content post a half hour after someone else, you’re probably going to catch some downvotes.

      • rigatti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well that’s because this post was made a half hour after the other post. Too little, too late to grab all of them sweet sweet fake internet points.