• zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      I wonder what the “fuck that hurt” rate is for these fishes

    • Didros@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      …that sounds to me like “survive the fall” more than “survive the week”

      • _bcron_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        ·
        8 hours ago

        One of the bigger reasons has to do with the square cube law - as the size of something increases, surface area increases by a factor of 2 but mass increases by a factor of 3, so little fishes have a surface area-to-mass ratio that is quite a bit higher than a larger fish, and they’re more susceptible to abrupt changes in temperature.

        Kinda like how an ice cube will melt a lot faster than a big slab of ice, the core temperature of some small fish like a goldfish is gonna change more rapidly than the core temperature of a big fish like a trout so they tend to be a lot more finnicky in regard to significant and instantaneous changes to temperature and stuff. A larger fish might shrug off a significant change because it affects them more slowly, but that might be a totally wild an overwhelming experience for a little fish to go through

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You can yeet goldfish. Carp are stupid tough. It’s the tropical fish we often keep that are kinda wimpy. Also, they’re not coming from a super healthy environment (the store) to our tanks.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              31 minutes ago

              I definitely have not, and now I have. I’m unsure if I should thank you for this or not.

              I feel like it takes the sport out of it if the fish is dead though. The whole sport of the carp throwing is that a carp absolutely can kick a grown man’s ass and flop to freedom if he isn’t careful. You leave a carp alone long enough and those things turn into damn near coelacanths. They’ll eat your dog. Manhandling one of those suckers into a parabolic arc is going to take skill, strength, planning, and luck.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Maybe 95% survive, but how many are injured in a way that might impact their quality of life?

        Since these are being dropped specifically for the purpose of being caught and killed asap, quality of life might not matter.

        For your sad little goldfish, please be gentle!

        • Ilovethebomb
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          My understanding is these are juvenile fish that will be caught as adults, so they will live for a while.

        • subtext@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Also, gotta think about whether 5% mortality rate is acceptable.

          For an airdrop number of pond fish? Sure!

          For your hobbyist number of expensive fish? Absolutely not

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        One reason is because the hatcheries are in the same general area as the lakes, so conditions are pretty similar. The temperature will be about the same at the same depths as the hatchery, and the water comes from the same source.