People are replying to his comment by saying they’re gonna put his approval of them on their resumé.
The wiki page can currently be summed up with “Hamas is responsible because the US says so.”
People are replying to his comment by saying they’re gonna put his approval of them on their resumé.
The wiki page can currently be summed up with “Hamas is responsible because the US says so.”
This community is becoming /r/conspiracy. Calling out someone for obviously ignoring the genocide is one thing. Trying to paint someone who acknowledges that there are competing propaganda efforts as bad because they don’t black and white pick a side, is how you get the next QAnon.
It was very obviously israel that struck the hospital, to even entertain the idea that it wasnt is pure racism,
https://nitter.net/evanhill/status/1714366113818038412 Read the thread, watch the video
Palestine does not have such large munitions, otherwise tel aviv would be a smoldering pile of rubble
By pretending this wasnt definitly israel you ARE “ignoring the genocide” a genocide isnt a magic word that dissapears a people, a genocide is a concrete set of actions composed of slaughtering civilians. THIS IS THE FORM WHICH THE GENOCIDE IS TAKING
That thread is itself inconclusive. A video with a whirring then an explosion doesn’t confirm where it came from. The blast crater is inconsistent with an Israeli air strike, which doesn’t mean it wasn’t from one. No-one has been able to independently examine the damage and even the number of casualties is disputed.
There is not enough proof to say who is responsible for this incident. That doesn’t mean Israel isn’t hell bent on the genocide of the Palestinian people.
i would suggest you read this article
Yes. A very reputable source.
and what is your source? CNN? Fox News?
The article is only describing facts. Here have another one.
Mate you’re missing the point. You might trust these sources, but to me they have absolutely no reputation. You may as well post a video of the drunken ramblings of your local homeless guy.
Anyway I was initially responding to a link to a thread from a Washington Post journalist, have seen the Al Jazira video analysis. It’s all inconclusive.
What has a reputation to you then? Seems to me like you’re willing to dismiss the perspective of non-Zionist Jews entirely with a single remark.
Here’s a news website https://truecrimenewsweekly.com/ that’s main concern is Australian Politics do you trust it?
https://www.channel4.com/news/who-was-behind-the-gaza-hospital-blast-visual-investigation
even certain western outlets are saying more investigation is needed to determine considering how much Israeli state lies.
Wikipedia’s ‘NPOV’ is a bullshit concept. There is no such thing.
“Earth could be spherical or it could be flat, no one knows”
“Most people believe Holocaust happened but there are some deniers”
“Some people believe COVID vaccines contain microchips, though this is disputed.”
All these could be considered neutral statements but if one were to see it an actual article they would think its ridiculous because Earth being spherical(ish) is the reality, Holocaust did happen and COVID vaccines do not contain microchips. Why should bullshit “theories” be entertained?
Also Gaza doesn’t even have power or water right now, what ‘propaganda’ effort do you think Hamas or PIJ is doing compared to a state funded and propped up by a superpower
using 4chan as your source I see
The earth is provably not flat. The Holocaust provably happened. Covid vaccine’s provably don’t contain microchips. No-one has yet proved who was responsible for the explosion at Al Alhi Hospital and that’s the difference.
Why do you say that the holocaust merely “probably” happened if you are secure in saying that the absence of microchips in covid vaccines is proven fact?
Elaborate on the uncertainties surrounding if the holocaust happened or not, please, we’re all very interested in what makes you use such soft language when referring to it.
Edit: Sure, blame the spellcheck, hitlerite.
deleted by creator
Stupid spell check. Fixed.
This you? You clearly already thought we’ve lost the plot, so have wandered in to stir the pot, if you’ll excuse the mixed metaphors.
lol pronouns and content warning for animal abuse and their products really triggers libs
It’s so funny how much they whine about the pronouns. If it was a choice between male/female/other they’d be fine with it, but PRONOUNS are too much.
Wow really got us there communism = big goberment
Both things are true
Cool. Enjoy your stay. Hopefully you and the people you interact with walk away having learnt something, or at least with an appreciation for why one another has arrived at their respective positions.
Valuing your career over thousands of dead civilians is bad.
How is waiting for more evidence to come out before making a record = valuing your career over thousands of dead civilians?
Even if you completely disregard the western response, the original claim of 500 people being killed conflicts with reports from Doctors on the scene who estimated around 500 casualties with 2-300 of those being killed.
It’s literally taking place in an active warzone, and Palestinians should and will inflate numbers for political leverage. It’s not the job of an archival organization to involve themselves in the process.
I don’t really see why this particular event is so pertinent to this sub, it doesn’t change the onus of responsibility for the deaths. If it was a Jdam from Israel, well that’s not really shocking, they are the reason the people were at the hospital to begin with. If it was a faulty rocket from hamas, the invasion was still the reason it was fired in the first place.
By focusing on what hit the hospital we are detracting from the more important question. Why was the hospital hit by an explosive in the first place?
Even if we accepted your terminally muh both sides-brained argument that there are two competing propaganda efforts, one of them is backed by the full force of the Western media.
So? Yes that’s one side. What, because the other side isn’t, it’s more believable?
The side being genocided is generally more believable than the side doing and supporting the genocide.
And the first side I’m talking about here are the Palestinian civilians and medical staff who have described their personal experiences of being bombed by Israel.
One side has a vested interest worth billions of dollars.
That doesn’t make the other side more believable.
yikes… just gonna double down on it now huh? might wanna just head back to libland
redditor!
oppa gangnam style