“Any foreign adversary seeking to buy a President knows the price,” warns Rep. Sean Casten

A Democrat who sits on the House Financial Services Committee warned that former President Donald Trump’s inability to secure a bond for his $464 million fraud judgment makes him a “massive national security risk.”

Trump’s lawyers in a filing on Monday told a New York appeals court that he cannot secure a bond after approaching 30 underwriters.

“The amount of the judgment, with interest, exceeds $464 million, and very few bonding companies will consider a bond of anything approaching that magnitude,” the attorneys wrote.

The filing quoted an insurance broker who signed an affidavit stating that securing the bond is a “practical impossibility.”

    • tsonfeir
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Gotta hush all those girls he pees on in Russian hotels.

        • tsonfeir
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Keep on telling yourself that 🥹

            • tsonfeir
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well now I know you’re joking. Yahoo News 😂 you almost had me.

              • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I mean I just grabbed the first source. Meanwhile you won’t find a source for your claim anywhere, because he was never accused of that.

                • tsonfeir
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  He admitted to hiring prostitutes to pee on a bed. It’s not a stretch to imagine that they performed other tasks.

                  Either way, Donald Trump hired prostitutes.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      this is past tense, isn’t it? like, he doesn’t ave more secrets to sell, and he’s sold the ones he already had…

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Unless he ends up in the white house again…then plenty more secrets to sell!

        I can’t believe that’s actually a possibility…

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          I can’t believe that’s actually a possibility…

          me neither. I really want to wake up and find out the last 8 years have been one long, fucked up dream.

        • Demosthememes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          As the GOP nominee he will begin to receive some intelligence briefings even before the elections, as early as July. It was recently reported that the White House, caught in a “damned if you damned if you don’t scenario” that is synonymous with Trump, sided to go with tradition & allow Trump access to these, even while he fights a classified documents mishandling case in court. This wouldn’t make any sense in a Jack Ryan novel & yet …

  • EatATaco
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    8 months ago

    When I got my security clearance, one of the things they drove home was reporting people who were having money problems because, as this points out, having money problems makes you prone to being bribed, and thus a threat.

    • Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think it should negate you from running for high office but it should make people consider who they vote for.

      • ramble81
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        So that’s an interesting question there. An elected official gets to see top secret information that anyone else would have to go through a stringent check on. Why shouldn’t the elected official be held to the same standard as they will be accessing the same information? Why does being elected override that?

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, in my opinion, I’d rather have a homeless person as president than a rich bastard. I don’t think wealth should influence electability, but it does anyway. There should be plenty of checks in place though, just not requiring wealth.

        • exocrinous@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Because those processes aren’t democratic, and the office of the president ought to be democratic.

          Imagine that the US air force is operating an extrasolar space exploration program out of the Cheyenne Mountain Complex using an ancient egyptian wormhole generator. Naturally, knowledge of the Stargate program is restricted to air force personnel with top secret security clearance. But it is absolutely essential that a democratically elected president should have knowledge and oversight of the program, and the power to make knowledge of extraterrestrial life made public if democratically appropriate. Such programs should not solely be known of by personnel who pass the military’s standard for secrecy, because otherwise you essentially have a government controlled by the military.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          I mean I agree.

          I also think that we could do away with primaries and parties together, then put together a list of qualifications for all the available elected positions; each voter is required to when registering to list their qualifications; then at random we select a pool of potential applicants for a given campaign cycle. We then vote on the candidates and decide. Public office shouldn’t be a career, it should be a civic obligation like jury duty. Unless you have a valid reason to not hold office, welp, if your number comes up…

      • radiohead37@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ideally, yes. But this guy can stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and not lose any voters.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Lmao, as if there was ever a legitimate and legal way for him to get this money. “What if I sell secrets to somebody rich” was his default strategy before he even entered the white house. This doesn’t make him any more of a security risk because he’s already maxed out that metric many times over.

  • Tronn4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    8 months ago

    He is a security threat first and foremost with his previous debt he should never had had a security clearance. His outside connections make him the exact person people with clearances are trained to spot and bring up.

  • arc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 months ago

    I wonder what would happen if Putin straight up offered to cover his debts? I expect Trump would actually accept that offer and his idiot base would see nothing wrong with it if he did.

  • thefartographer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 months ago

    Which is exactly why we should drop all the lawsuits against him and proactively bribe him with patriot-money! /s

    The s stands for both sarcasm and sadness…

  • Kushan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wow, guess the Saudis overpaid with that $1billion, they must be kicking themselves

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honestly, I kinda want Putin to personally secure it for him. It would be a test of the system. It would let us know what needs to be done.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well he could fly over here and deliver it on person. Hopefully that route passes over Ukraine.

        • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Even if not, US is obligated to get him to the court. I imagine the hearings would last months, maybe years. But he can grab the bird by it’s tail and become, param-pam-pam!, a prison reviewer!

          This Supermax prison, khe-khe, is nothing like our Polar Wolf or Black Dolphin. Like, nothing at all. I’m collected in a clean environment, three foods per day, no torture. They feel like that’s how you treat your most dangerous bastards? Most of my countrymen strive to live like this, honestly.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    risk? He was already working with Russia to subvert the 2016 election. He was bought a long time ago and has been transparently working for Russian interests since.