• Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    That’s why I only use Kelvin. 314.15 sounds like 3 times more “WTF HOW HOT IS TODAY??!?” than your paltry 107

  • KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck it. I’m inventing a new scale.

    Behold! “Disagree Degrees”. We’re going to combine the best traits of the other units. No more searching for the stupid little degree character in the character map. D for degrees or disagrees - whatever, I don’t give a shit.

    0D = 0K (Like Kelvin, no negatives! That’s so dumb!) 0.4D = -40 C and -40 F 1D = Water Freezing point (Need a consistent point of scale) 10D = “Pleasant temperature” 100D = Kind of hot 500D = Really hot for people (>40C or >100F) “It’s like 500 disagrees out there!” 1000D= Water boiling (To match the freezing temp) 1,000,000,000,000D = Surface of the sun

    Good luck on the math converting to other units, this temperature scale isn’t about being useful for nerd stuff, it’s all about appealing to our emotions.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Bigger number is more better” also explains American sports where you get 3 points for running a bit and then play stops for an ad break and the national anthem.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    YOU’RE BOILING?!?

    Oh, you’re just an inbecile who likes to prove the movie Idiocracy is actually a documentary.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      145
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, but it hits different. Smaller number is smaller.

      That’s why I use Kelvin. THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DEGREES?!!

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      100%

      It’s just Americans having American perspectives promoted as world views.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s about crossing into triple digits, a new order of magnitude, it feels heavy.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          But it’s also underwhelming when your usual reference for over 100 is, “WHAT IT’S HOT ENOUGH TO BOIL WATER OUTSIDE!?”

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          American: IT’S A HUNDRED AND SEVEN DEGREES OUTSIDE

          Civilized people: no it fucking ain’t, you overdramatic princess

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        brother, that’s what a world view is lmao, do you not understand this concept?

        Most of us don’t really go anywhere outside of the US, the entire continental US is the literal equivalent of the collective EU. What do you want me to say? I literally don’t need to leave to US to experience something geographically unique.

        • Ezergill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think they’ve meant world’s view, not worldview

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            im pretty sure the world’s view would be that we’re parasites destroying the well balanced nature of the ecology of the earth, but that’s just me.

        • uienia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          geographically unique

          Geographically perhaps. But the cultural and historical unique is something you are going to miss out on by staying inside your own home country for your entire life. You think your US regional differences are the same as the differences between two countries, but anyone who has experienced different countries will tell you in an instant that that is not so.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            i mean culturally in terms of outside of the continental US sure. There’s plenty of interesting and unique culture within the US if you just go looking for it. Though a lot of it is going to be somewhat westernized in essence. If you want more eastern culture, obviously you’re going to have to go farther east, but i feel like that’s a given.

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      On the other hand, if it was 107°C outside, the outrage would be so much more justified.

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s that extra “one” of incredulity.

      40 degrees, that’s just too hot.

      41? You’ve got to be fucking kidding me.

        • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          We’re more familiar with 5.56x45mm thanks to all our school shootings thank you very much.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            In the same way a US ton and a metric ton is like 10% different, a 556 bullet is actually 5.7 mm across.

            • Morphit @feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              8 days ago

              Because the minor diameter of the barrel is 5.56 mm and the major diameter is 5.69 mm. If the bullet were smaller than that then the propellant would blow past it. They didn’t make a 'murican millimetre like they did with the imperial system.

          • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            I would make a bet that more mass shootings are done with 9mm. Depending on which shootings they consider ‘mass’ I see estimates from 60-80% for handgun usage. I’m sure the cheap .22 is a large number, but 9mm is probably right up there. There is a large bias in reporting the school shootings and shootings involving rifles by the media. They almost ignore the others.

      • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        In point of fact Americans have gotten impressive results out of far more complicated metrics than metric. It’s not a matter of understanding, it’s a matter of pride. And of not having to buy all new tools.

      • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        The best system would have 0 at a mild, comfortable temperature, and go up or down by 100 degrees per one degrees Fahrenheit.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          But mild and comfortable is different for different people who are acclimated to different weather.

          We need a defined ‘mild’ temperature. i vote for 70F/21C.
          It’s a bit chilly for the warm weathered folks and a bit warm for the cold weathered folks. Seems reasonable but I’m open to suggestions.

          • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I’d adjust it to 68/20 just so it lines up with whole numbers in both systems. And on second thought, make it 90 per degree Fahrenheit so any whole F or C value can convert to a whole number.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            it needs to be a range, you can’t really just have a single point, something like 50f to 70f would be good. Some people like a little below, some people like a little above, the 60s are generally pretty comfy all around though.

            We also need to consider clothing as well. Which i do in this case.

      • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can absolutely yell about that. And when Fahrenheit flips to negative, you’re ready to express some big feelings about how fucking cold it is.

    • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      And Rankine would be even better than Kelvin in terms of “big number go brrr.” Water boils at 671 R.

      Of course, Rankine is the most obnoxious unit I’ve ever had to deal with, but those numbers sure are big!

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      OK, but with Rankine, if it’s 101 out, you can go Five Hundred and SIXTY degrees??!

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Please raise this temperature by 1.4x10^-23 Joules - statements of the utterly deranged

      • uis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Joules are energy. You need thermal capacity to turn them into temperature.

  • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    For proof that this thread is just people justifying what they know as better somehow, look no further than Canada.

    We do cooking temps in Fahrenheit, weather in Celsius. Human weights in pounds, but never pounds and oz. Food weights in grams, cooking weights in pounds and oz. Liquid volume in millilitres and litres, but cooking in cups, teaspoons and tablespoons. Speed & distance in kilometres, heights in feet and inches.

    Try and give this any consistency and people will look at you like you’re fucked. The next town is 100km over, I’m 5ft 10in, a can of soda is 355ml, it’s 21c out and I have the oven roasting something at 400f. Tell me it’s 68f out and I will fight you.

    People like what they are used to, and will bend over backwards to justify it. This becomes blatantly obvious when you use a random mix of units like we do, because you realize that all that matters is mental scale.

    If Fahrenheit is “how people feel” then why are feet useful measurements of height when 90% of people are between 4ft and 6ft? They aren’t. You just know the scale in your head, so when someone says they’re 7ft tall you say “dang that’s tall”. That’s it.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You can make the temperature dial of an oven have matching degrees of rotation and degrees Celcius.

        Turn the dial to point straight down to bake at 180°

        Turn it 3/4 of the way to cook a pizza at 270°

      • Godort
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 days ago

        You could bake something at 420 Celsius too, assuming your okay with charcoal as the end product

      • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        ok you actually convinced me, Fahrenheit is better (except I can’t spell it properly without autocorrect)

        • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          I can’t spell it properly without autocorrect

          This is genuinely the most inconvenient thing about Fahrenheit

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        you can also bake things at 420C if you’re not a coward about this (like proper thin pizza) (maybe it’s a bit too high but you get the idea)

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        A cup of lukewarm coffee please.

        Edit: my wrong, I thought it was 69°F !

        All my excuses

        • expatriado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          According to James Hoffmann, the ideal temperature to enjoy coffee is between 50°C and 60°C, he may know a thing or two about coffee, and you may think the coffee you drink is hotter that it really is.

    • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Also it’s a 0-100 scale of how hot it is outside, and it requires no prior understanding to use it as such.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        The freezing point of water is very important to weather, and requires prior knowledge of the arbitrary number 32.

        • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Is it? Only pure water will actually freeze at 0c. Rain, puddles, lakes, etc aren’t all that pure… And we’re talking about ambient air temps here. The air can be below freezing and it can still rain. And you can get snow/hail above freezing…

          Knowing the freezing point is just one factor. Knowing it’s generally around 30F is pretty much always close enough (not that remembering 32 is actually very difficult)

          Edit: also water only freezes at 0c if it’s at sea level… I really don’t think 0°=freezing is the huge advantage that celcius stans think it is.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          yeah, and let me know how accurate our weather models and prediction systems are. Can you calculate accurately how much the temperature in a specific part of the atmosphere will drop to a large updraft?

          What’s that? This is literally an entire career field of study and development? Oh that’s weird.

          Also the only real time this is relevant, is when things that have this weird property called thermal mass get below freezing, it’s snowing in 30f weather? That’s not sticking, the ground is too warm. or the sun will literally just melt it even if it is cold enough. Water? You mean that weird thing called like, a lake or river? Those get below freezing, without actively freezing, lakes won’t even drop that much in terms of temperature, aside from the surface level. The surface may freeze, but even that is pretty variable.

          Also yes, it’s the arbitrary number of 32, so is literally every number though. We have 2 numbers to remember, you also have 2 numbers to remember, god forbid you have like, a password, or a passcode, or like, a numbers based lock somewhere. Humans have never been known to be good at memorizing short strings of data.

          like idk how to tell you this, but, it’s not that big of a deal?

        • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Okay so fahrenheit has a well-defined high and low, but an arbitrary freezing point of one certain chemical. All other chemical freezing points are arbitrary.

          Celsius has an arbitrary high and low, but a well-defined freezing point of that same chemical. All other freezing points are arbitrary.

          If your motivation is to minimize the amount of arbitrary values you have to memorize, fahrenheit is the clear winner.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            The zero C is freezing and 100 C is boiling, so not really arbitrary.

            But it’s pretty hard to define a scale that has intuitive, round numbers for everything we might care about.

            • Lizardking27@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              You’re correct. In a lab setting, 0C and 100C are not arbitrary.

              In the weather forecast, they are.

              Which ties into your final point, it’s hard to define a scale that is best for everything, which is exactly what I’ve been saying this whole time. Fahrenheit is better for some things, Celsius for others.

              The only reason people in this thread are saying otherwise is because for some reason they’ve tied up some significant part of their self-worth into their belief that “lmao DAE fahrenheit bad amirite??1?”, and they mistakenly believe that those of us that understand nuance are trying to belittle or disparage them in some way. I assure you, we are not.

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                0C and 100C are not arbitrary.

                well i mean technically, the only reason they aren’t arbitrary is because the mean something, the numbers arent significant, it’s what they represent, which is the boiling/freezing point of water.

                The only reason people in this thread are saying otherwise is because for some reason they’ve tied up some significant part of their self-worth into their belief that “lmao DAE fahrenheit bad amirite??1?”, and they mistakenly believe that those of us that understand nuance are trying to belittle or disparage them in some way. I assure you, we are not.

                i’m seeing people put very little thought into the things they’re saying, i just recently posted a comment covering a few of those things in this thread. For some reason europeans seem to just get absolutely brainfucked when presented with the concept of a unit system that isn’t metric, it’s like your literal entire lives are built upon the concept of 0 10 100 scaling, and you can’t consider literally anything outside of it.

                Now maybe i’m being a little hyperbolic here, but US peeps pretty well understand that we could just “be using celsius” that’s not really a wacky concept or idea here. Celsius peeps really seem to think that if they had to use fahrenheit, they would probably die from accidental over-consumption of water, somehow. And in their defense, a lot of our shit is kinda fucking weird. But again, it’s really not that bad.

                at least, this has been my experience from the various threads i’ve been in on this topic over time.

          • criticon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            The 0 in Fahrenheit was based on nothing and the 100F was supposed to be human temperature but it is off by some degrees

            The water is not an arbitrary temperature, the weather is water dependant, at 0C the water will freeze and you get snow/ice instead of rain

            • actually@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              0°F is when the ocean freezes

              100° F was human body temperature, later revised somewhat with better measurements and a decrease of parasites . The average person in those days in London had a slightly higher body temperature than today

              • criticon@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                0F is not ocean freezing, is the freezing temp of a brine mix that he chose arbitrarily (some think that he chose that temp because it was close to the coldest his town had ever been and he used it to calibrate the scales of his thermometers)

                FYI, the ocean freezes at around 28F

                • actually@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Oceans freezing also depends on currents, and mixing of the water from the surface. 28° will freeze water in a room.

                  This is why often the ocean is not frozen at much lower temperatures.

                  I’m not at all cognizant of how 0 was decided

      • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        If that was true outsiders should be able to use Fahrenheit without much explanation. I’ve never got a clue what the °F values mean, I always have to use a converter. It’s really not as intuitive as people who grew up with it seem to believe.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          If that was true outsiders should be able to use Fahrenheit without much explanation. I’ve never got a clue what the °F values mean, I always have to use a converter. It’s really not as intuitive as people who grew up with it seem to believe.

          because it’s all relative, and you need to actually know how the temperatures relate to the things you’re experiencing? I’m going to hazard a guess and say you’re comfortable with using celsius? Oops cognitive bias. You would have to test this on someone who doesn’t understand temperature yet. It just so happens that here in the US, it pretty conveniently lines up with those figures for us.

          • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            If your example cannot be proven on any existing person I’d argue it’s hardly relevant to our reality.

            °F most definitely isn’t intuitive enough for people who aren’t accustomed to it to use. If it is more intuitive at all, it’s not to any meaningful degree.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              If your example cannot be proven on any existing person I’d argue it’s hardly relevant to our reality.

              possibly? Arguably you could still make the case that the existing range of 0-100f is more pleasant, and arguably nicer to use. But you would have to either find someone uniquely adapted to both systems, or you would have to do a lot of independent study on how humans interact with numbers and ranges of numbers. In order to find a specific answer it’s going to be quite hard.

              intuition is bullshit anyway, it’s highly predicated on previous experience and an existing knowledge base, so i feel like that’s kind of arguing “well a race car driver drives good, so why don’t normal drivers drive good” kind of territory if you arent careful.

              • Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Yeah, which is why most people here in favor of Celcius argue that Fahrenheit isn’t, in fact, more intuitive and therefore more suited to describe the weather. Both are arbitrary, both can be learned and used very easily, the only difference is what you’re used to.

                • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  yeah, but i think arguing that celsius is “more intuitive” when the one primary advantage outside of science is that it lines up with water relatively nicely compared to fahrenheit, is like, ok.

                  32f and 212f and 0c and 100c aren’t really all that substantially different as far as the general use case goes.

  • mcSibiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    By that logic, Americans should use km/h instead of mph. Going 0-100 is much better than 0-60. For the same reason you keep telling us why Fahrenheit is so much more intuitive.

  • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Sounds like a great time to propose my system of temperature: Super Celsius. I’ll connect it to the freezing and boiling points of water just like Celsius, but while freezing remains at 0, boiling is now 1000. Get ready for a nice mild day of 250.

  • hex@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Once again… the classic argument of: “Well, I grew up using this system, and I’m used to the system. I have built an internal intuition for how hot and cold the temperature is. I am used to >100 being hot! 40 is not hot!”

    Well then. I grew up using celcius and… “IT’S FOURTY FUCKING ONE DEGREES OUTSIDE?” sounds just as hot.

  • tino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    it’s not about what makes more sense: what makes more sense is what you use everyday and is natural to you. 40+ C is freaking hot because when you experience it, it’s freaking hot. It’s about what the entire rest of the world is using as a standard.