• abbadon420
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In all honesty, the British (and everyone else) do have a rightful claim to ownership of ancient Egyptian artifacts. That’s where civilization began basically, at least at that scale. Sure, it was mostly the Romans who forced “civilization” on to the British Isles, but they were directly influenced by the Egyptians. So, there’s a connection there. Ancient Egyptian culture is basically ally important to everyone. They traded all over the known world. So, everyone has a legitimate claim to these artifacts.

    Sure, Egypts claim is stronger and the properties are not fairly divided anyway. But I just wanted to illustrate that the problem is not solely about the British having stolen these artifacts. It’s a valid and strong argument, but not the only argument.

    • PMFL@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      And the girl in the back on the original post photo, looking like this below meme photo. LoL

  • Questy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Since I don’t see much football stuff on Lemmy, this is Mohammed Salah, an Egyptian footballer and premier league royalty. YNWA

        • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You see, when football is mentioned online, the collective intelligence of any comment section is cut by at least 90%. This stacks with another 90% if it’s women’s football or any token LGBT acknowledgement in football. The joke is Muslim Bad.

          Which is a shame. I used to make fun of le sportsball amirite until it clicked that there was immense entertainment value in these matches, which could be super tense and exciting even when an individual match doesn’t have super high stakes. There’s storylines with each of the players and managers, there’s a lot of diverging personalities among them and they all handle the same game in their own way. And unlike scripted shows, when something unexpected happens it is so much more interesting. Like the story is real in a way that scripted entertainment isn’t.

          • ugo@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You have expressed my feelings excellently. I find football a very entertaining sport (not that I have the money to watch it, or the time / energy / social media connections to keep very up to date with it) but the fanbase can be absolutely braindead.

            I mean, I love rivalries and some shithousery, but things escalate too often, too much, and too quickly.

            Still, wish I knew of ways that would allow me to keep up to date with stuff without costing me a good chunk of change or a huge amount of time, or having to have a twatter account or whatnot.

  • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    7 hours ago

    funny for an Egyptian man to say this, considering that it was made by black people not Arabs. If such things went by blood then and culture then South Sudan would have the strongest claim to it, its like saying that art by ancient indigenous americans belongs to an amerikkkan only difference is time.

    • BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      If you look at any of the ancient statues they don’t look black, whatever the recent propaganda tries to push. It doesn’t make any sense to put everyone in those four racial boxes - an Ethiopian looks as distinct from a South African as a Spaniard and a Swede

      • milicent_bystandr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Time to expand the Empire again.

        Edit: “it’s not an empire, it’s one big country!”

    • 50_centavos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Just because Egypt is in Africa doesn’t automatically make Egyptians black. Look at a map. Northern Africa and Egypt were just as much part of southern Europe and the Middle East.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hell look at the written records of the pharaohs. Ramseses II (Ozymendias, of King of kings, look upon his works all ye mighty and despair fame) reasserted control of Canaan and Phoenicia, led military campaigns into Syria and the Levant, and also led expeditions into Nubia. That indicates a clearly more established connection to the Middle East than to elsewhere in Africa at the height of ancient Egypt (height of the new kingdom).

    • JamesConnollysStache [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Oh cool. Hotep? So, what percentage of Nubian blood must Mo Salah have before he is allowed to claim a connection to Ancient Egypt? Upper or Lower? Pseudohistory aside, one’s own cultural history is not subject to some racial blood purity tests. That’s some borderline Nazi shit. Anyway, fuck the Brits.

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Is this an ancient Kush statue or am I missing something? I don’t believe upper ancient Egypt would be considered modern Sudan. Also DNA evidence from Egyptian mummies show little to no sub saharan DNA in them. How did you learn this information?

    • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      except that not actually an other hand sorta thing at all, almost exclusively it was colonizers and their wars that destroyed so many of artifacts the artifacts that werent stolen, if they weren’t delivery destroyed by colonizers to erase history and beyond even that the colonizers carelessness, greed, and racism which they brought to archeology led to much more than just artifacts being destroyed. There are so many historical sites whose histories we will never know at all because these clown excavated them to take “relics” and took little if any records where their precious artifacts were found and how, and that is if sites were not destroyed in their entirety out of sheer idiocy in the search of something else like how troy was. 18th, 19th, and even some 20th century so called archeology is a history of the destruction of history.

      • 50_centavos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Holy run-on sentences. I agree with you, but it was done, it’s already in the museums. Signing petitions and raising awareness of agencies/museums that are trying to get the stuff back is probably a better way to funnel your frustrations.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Sure, I’m gonna steal your TV because I’ll take better care of it than you would.

      You’re welcome

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is a conundrum I can’t wrap my head around. One (country, usually) can have something of cultural significance, and decide what to do with that. They can make it a museum, make it generally available, forbid access at all, and even destroy it completely (e.g. see Palmyra under ISIS).

          If the object in question is not protected by UNESCO (and really, even if it is) no one has a say in that. The only remotely correct argument that can be made is that destroying historical artifacts makes it hard or impossible to study history, but one can argue that we don’t need to study history, it’s not like this is an imperative. Another argument may be that things do not belong to those who have it, but instead to their people as inheritors of people who lived long ago, but I don’t think that also helps.

          And so, on one hand, I am for preserving artifacts and not destroying those, on the other hand, I don’t quite see what moral ground is there for it.

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That’s an interesting point. While I agree it’s kinda shitty the UK nicked everyone’s cool stuff and shoved it in 1 building. I’m willing to bet if we hadn’t the number of pieces that would be lost to time would not be zero

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        This is just weird revisionist history. They moved in stole shit, colonized and murdered. The after the fact excuse of “we took it to preserve it” doesn’t play mostly because their colonizer bullshit is largely the reason areas they stole shit from are destabilized.

        • Z3k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m not revising anything its a shitty thing to do and it should all be returned. It was just a thought with a beer given how volatile some of the areas where the stuff comes and yes I know most of them ended up volatile because of colonialism.

      • Jilanico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah I’m totally sure the Brits didn’t break a single thing shipping artifacts to their big fancy museum. Let’s ignore all the mummies Europeans ground up into powder and ingested as “medicine”. Savagely eating dead humans with the same mouths that say brown people are too savage to take care of their own artifacts.

  • BellaDonna@mujico.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Honestly the concept of property here is just silly. Who specifically do they belong to, why, what claim, and how could such a claim exist?

    I just don’t agree with the concept, this individual doesn’t have any right to ownership regardless of whether his specific family owned it at some point prior, but most likely a direct relative doesn’t even own it, just someone with his self same ‘race’ ( which race doesn’t really exist either tbh, not genetically anyway, but exists as a social construct ).

    I just despise this mentality. I don’t own anything collectively with anyone of my ‘race’, neither their achievements nor shames, and same for even direct relatives.

    There is not enough generic diversity in humans to even prop up the idea of race beyond being a cultural construct, it’s time to stop seeing our fellow humans as something other.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Property rights only exist when non-western countries want their stuff / land back. When the west stole them, then its finders keepers.

      /s

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The phrasing was weird, but this guy was born in Egypt and the statue was taken from Egypt. This isn’t a matter of private property, he’s commenting on how the UK exploited Egypt.

      Sure, race and nationality are social constructs and genetics don’t support the divisions we make along phenotypic lines, however, you can’t just hope to solve racism and colonialism by saying they are gone and meaningless. If you say they no longer exist, that doesn’t erase the impacts racism and colonialism have had on a people.

      In essence, it’s like punching someone repeatedly until they are bloody, stealing the money from their wallet to buy yourself a house, and then saying, “why can’t we forget our differences and just be friends?” Is everything alright? Is it ok that you now have a home and the other person is destitute because you stole their money? Does it make it any better if it was your parents or grandparents who did this and now you’ve inherited the house?

      Just claiming it’s a social construct and wiping your hands of the issue does not fix the problem. And that metaphor I made does not even encompass the entire issue! Reality is more along the lines of: now that you own this house, you enforce policies that continually raise the price of housing and put a tax on people who don’t own a house. The exploitation many people have suffered at the hands of racism and colonialism never stopped, it just changed it’s form.