EDIT: Commentary removed.

  • teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    205
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hate the orange fucker but it sounds like he has PTSD. I have combat PTSD and see dangers where there aren’t any. Sometimes your brain just wants you to leave the area.

    • jagermo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      169
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, he should retire and have that looked at. Poor guy, he needs some rest. At his age…

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trump’s policies resulted in thousands of veterans with PTSD being denied treatment by the VA on account of lack of funding. If anyone deserves to suffer from it, he does.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate the orange shitbag and have no sympathy if he is suffering. I genuinely want good things for all people. But he wants bad things for many people and so my wishes for good things don’t extend to him, his ilk, etc.

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sounds like SS told him that. He said security doesn’t want us here.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Did someone come up and whisper in his ear? Was he wearing an earpiece? If he knew ahead of time that “security [didn’t] want [him] there,” security wouldn’t have let him be there in the first place.

        He may have dined with RFK Jr.

        • aramis87@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          49
          ·
          3 months ago

          It sounds like he didn’t like the questions being asked and this is his new way of ending an interview.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        While I’m not a fan of tfg, and I don’t know whether he’s lying or telling the truth, there’s legitimate reason to take his comment seriously. We may not like him, but the SS has a job to do.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          It could be all of the above. It is hard to say with Trump. I agree the SS has a job to do and after their last screw up, they are being overly cautious

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Active PTSD without treatment? Absolutely not. Maybe with some really good therapy but can you imagine that turnip taking advice from a therapist? Hah!

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        From 2017 to 2021 the duties seemed to consist of golfing and watching TV. Spending a lot of time on the toilet and needing to give it dozens of flushes.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s starting to sound more and more like he does. It would be completely understandable given what happened.

      Also I’m sorry for what you went through, and I hope it gets better. My wife is infantry and I hope to God she never has to see combat.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but in this case, there was an apparent evolving credible threat on his life and his security detail probably told him to keep the interview brief and then move.

      I imagine his (new) secret service detail is a little jumpy after that whole incident in Pennsylvania.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have been completely calm on the outside yet freaking out on the inside and made excuses to leave so that really isn’t a tell for PTSD or not. I haven’t watched video of the event and I’m not saying the shitbag wouldn’t use it as an excuse to get out of hard questions, I’m just saying with my personal experiences being shot at that giving excuses to get out of what you think is a dangerous situation (but really isn’t) is a classic sign of PTSD.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          This exactly. It’s the subtle stuff that tells me he’s probably dealing with some high anxiety. If you’ve been through some intense trauma, and are in a triggering environment, you’re probably still trying to keep a game face on.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Those of us who have been shot at usually don’t start flailing around like a car lot tube man when we’re feeling insure. People usually have their game face on when they’re worrying behind the façade.

    • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thank you for linking to the vid!

      Sounds like he was just being an asshole and wanting to end the interview which the reported kept extending with questions. Seems like this is non-news.

      • ramchak@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think he got upset that she stepped in front of him to block his way before asking her question. He took it as disrespect and made the excuse to leave.

    • Affidavit
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Thanks. What a shitty news article to not even provide the video (yet still include a completely unrelated random video at the top of the page anyway).

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’ll notice that when a news source leaves out the obvious thing, a quote with context, video, picture, whatever, they’re hyping something up that’s not what the headline leads you to believe.

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Glad you posted the clip instead of Newsweek’s bond music video.

      The only thing the clip really shows is that RFK Jr was meant to be a Biden spoiler. Florida politicians have a history of using this tactic. However, Kennedy was only stealing Trump votes. Now the rapists are joining forces like usual.

    • Hux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just seemed like he was “done” with the interview and used the introduced topic of assassination/security as a way to force an exit.

      I don’t think anything has changed for him.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      My take is he just didn’t want to answer anymore questions. Probably not planned in advance, he was just making an excuse to get out of there.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    3 months ago

    Trump: I look so weak when I run away from interviews. If only there was a way to ditch an interview AND remind people of the assassination attempt.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Having your head on a swivel after being shot at is normal. But you know what’s also unfortunately normal? Being shot at in the US.

    A normal person would, after being shot at, consider pushing for responsible gun ownership legislation. He could help prevent what happened to him and hundreds of thousands of other Americans.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        “The second amendment people know that the radical left want to take your gu…”

        Someone knocks over a chair and makes a loud bang

        “WE’RE IN DANGER”

        • TransplantedSconie
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          Kamala should slam her hand down on her podium periodically during their debate just to see if she can trigger the fat fuck into flipping out. It would be amazing seeing him combat dive and roll around on the stage while screaming “WE’RE IN DANGER!”

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Someone sneaks in a package of ladyfinger 40/40 fireworks, and sets them off. Trump would hit the deck. They’d get talked to by the FBI. “It was just a prank, bro.”

            • Cort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              No just hand out little brown paper bags at the entrance. No need to bring fireworks into it

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      But you know what’s also unfortunately normal? Being shot at in the US.

      Oh, fuck off. Even if it did happen to “hundreds of thousands” of Americans, it wouldn’t be “normal”. The US has 340 MILLION people in it.

      But yeah, “hundreds of thousands” is bullshit it’s not even close to one hundred thousand, less than half that actually, about 43k last year: https://healthjournalism.org/blog/2024/02/nearly-43000-people-died-from-gun-violence-in-2023-how-to-tell-the-story/

      Something that happens to 1% of 1% of the population isn’t “normal”.

        • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          in a lifetime, 15% of Americans have witnessed a shooting, 25% have been threatened with a gun, 12% have been shot at, and 4% have been shot.

          You’re not actually suggesting ‘once in a lifetime’ falls under “normal occurrence”, are you?

          This is also a partial goalpost move, since the original sentiment responded to was asserting that “being shot at” was normal, and you’re now citing other things like ‘seeing someone else shoot someone’, obviously an event that’s much more common relatively speaking (but still nowhere near “normal” for the average American).

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m just saying that a LOT of Americans have and will experience what he just experienced.

            My wife and I were shot at by a nut job neighbor with a known record who should not have been allowed to own firearms. That once in a lifetime experience (I hope) was enough for us. No one should ever have to experience that.

            1 in 10 being shot at and 1 in 4 being threatened is way too fucking high.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve always felt like Trump uses “we” more like the “royal we” as in he’s a monarch, whereas other public figures use “we” to include society.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, also when ever he said ‘‘a lot of people don’t know this’’ he means ‘‘I just learned this a few days ago’’ and ‘‘a lot of people are saying’’ means ‘‘This is just my opinion’’. On the bizarre side of things, ‘‘bigly’’ is actually a real word in the English language and he would be using it grammatically correct most times he says it IF that was what he’s actually saying, but he not, he’s trying to say ‘‘big leauge’’ and is almost always using it incorrectly.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m old enough to remember when Newsweek was credible and respected. I understand the Magazine business model is brutal, but these days you’re more likely to run into someone who’s owned Newsweek than someone who subscribes to it.

      • xenoclast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        August 3, 2013.

        It’s been a while since any formerly credible news source was free of foreign ownership.

        All “news” media in the US has been entertainment and propaganda businesses wearing the logo and skin of dead journalism outlets since then.

        Only took a few years to get Trump installed as president. I’d say that’s amazingly effective

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Didn’t seem any worse to me than most news sites, but maybe you don’t use adblock…?

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, I’m glad the USSS seems to be taking security more seriously since the assassination attempt no matter who they’re protecting! It won’t always be Trump…

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree that tightened security across the board is smart. But I’m a little skeptical that the set of a tv show was actually all that dangerous and that he was actually told what he claims.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Cochise County Sheriff’s Office told Fox News that Syvrud is accused of making threatening posts on social media targeting Trump.

    Oh is that illegal now? I bet there’s a bunch of poll workers who would be interested to have such support from law enforcement.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ahead of Trump’s speech in Arizona, authorities announced that they apprehended 66-year-old Ronald Lee Syvrud. The Cochise County Sheriff’s Office told Fox News that Syvrud is accused of making threatening posts on social media targeting Trump. He was arrested without incident, according to Fox News, and had outstanding warrants in Wisconsin regarding a DUI and from Graham County, Arizona, involving hit-and-run and felony failure to register as a sex offender.

    Why am I not surprised.

  • Chespirito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We have a felon running for office who is openly telling his followers to revolt when he loses. We can’t let this ever happen again. We need to put some laws in place to stop a future Trump from happening again

    • andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree we need to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

      But, specifically what law(s) would you enact to stop this from happening and how would it fix it so this can’t happen again?

  • Letstakealook
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The clip just seems like he was done talking to the reporter, the reporter had another question (regarding a threat), and he gave an on topic (suprising) smart ass reply to her question in order to end the conversation. I think folks are reading too much into this.